Affordable Housing Trust Talks Preservation of Pittsfield Units

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Affordable Housing Trust member Michael McCarthy asked his colleagues: How do we leverage trust fund monies for quality affordable housing?

"I represent a lot of people and I've spoken with a lot of people about this issue and I'm thinking that one of the things that we should focus on as our trust is to figure out how our money can be a catalyst for developers or current owners of rental properties to make it affordable for them to make their properties nice while still keeping rents affordable and low," the attorney said last week.

 "I think that's where we would get the most bang for our buck."

Conversation was centered around preserving existing rental units for affordable housing, as new construction comes with supply chain costs that drive pricing. The panel is early in its work, meeting for the first time in the fall.

A search on Zillow shows that two-bedroom rental units in Pittsfield start at about $1,200 and often require first, last, and security upon signing.

"I think where we're going to have the most, as you said, bang for a buck is preserving the housing that we have and figuring out a way to make it affordable," Community Development Director Justine Dodds said.

"And I also think your point is correct, the market is not going to do that itself, there needs to be some catalyst or some subsidy somewhere to make it attractive."

She also pointed to the importance of making sure the city does not lose units and getting people to invest in the pre-existing stock to make it clean, safe, and a nice place to live.

"That's where I think we should we should be headed," she said.

Member Betsy Sherman, who is the executive director of the Christian Center, wondered if the city could offer subsidies for people to build tiny homes on infill lots.

"If you go to the West Side, we look like we've had a lot of teeth pulled. Every third or fourth house and some blocks, there's an empty lot because the house has been knocked down," she said.

"Are we thinking about houses that are boarded up that may still be functional but they've been boarded up because nobody's living there? Just in terms of how we're going to dispense the money."



McCarthy's thought was "all of the above" besides single-family homes, which can be aided by other programs.

Dodds reported that the city has two strategic planning initiatives around housing that will be kicked off shortly: looking at zoning in the West Side to make it more functional and funding through MassHousing's Neighborhood Hub program.

"It's technical assistance, so it would be a consultant to come in to kind of do a deep dive inventory on what parcels are over there, who owns what, what would be a good solution for some of those projects, and how do we fund it too," she said.

"That's always that's always the question foremost in our minds."

Dodds said these two things will provide some strategic planning and data to aid the trust's efforts.

The panel also spoke about areas of greater need and how to benefit the entire city.

Kamaar Taliaferro pointed out that some community members felt that Mayor Linda Tyer's At Home in Pittsfield program was unfair because of the more lenient guidelines for members in the Morningside, West Side, and downtown neighborhoods with the deepest need.

"I think one way that we can lift up the rest of the city by focusing on the housing that is in most need is to recognize that when there are concentrated areas of blight, it impacts the tax valuation of all the properties around. It artificially deflates them and one way to represent fairness to the rest of the city is to say it shows up in your tax bill," he said.

"When you have blight on the other side of town, it shows up in your tax bill so if we invest in these neighborhoods, right, it will also be an investment in lowering your taxes."

While he recognizes that there are many more steps to determining the tax rate, Taliaferro said it would be a good move for the entire city.

"It would put our city on more sound financial footing if we didn't have neighborhoods that are the most walkable, are the most dense, in my opinion, have the best people and schools and in theory should be among the most valuable, have this anchor of disinvestment over the decades," he added.


Tags: affordable housing,   affordable housing trust,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories