Pittsfield Council OKs Springside House Funding

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — With $1 million in funding secured, the second phase of Springside House renovations is a go.

The City Council on Tuesday accepted a $500,000 federal Save America's Treasures grant with a free cash match of $500,000 for interior renovations to the 160-year-old home.

An equal contribution from the city is a requirement of the award. Free cash was proposed for the allotment, as Pittsfield ended 2022 with a balance of around $17 million.

"When we have these historic properties, we need to make sure we're good stewards of them," Councilor at Large Peter White said.

He pointed out that construction costs are not lessening and identified this as a wise move to save taxpayers money down the road and give life back to the house that was once a hub of activity for the parks and more. ?

"This needs to be a priority," White urged. "We have the money we can use in free cash and by not prolonging the construction, we can save money and get this back into use."

Mayor Linda Tyer announced that the grant was received in December and earlier this month, two councilors' opposition resulted in a negative recommendation for the free cash ask from the finance subcommittee.

This is the second time the city's received funding through the Save America's Treasures program. It was started by then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, who traveled to Pittsfield in 1998 to bring $400,000 for the Colonial Theatre.

"It's a very prestigious award," Director of Community Development Justine Dodds said. "And it is uncommon, I think, for a community like Pittsfield to receive those grants."
 
The Italianate mansion formerly known as Elmhurst has sat vacant over the last 15 years after headquartering the city's Parks and Recreation Department since the 1950s. It also housed various community groups such as the winter carnival planners and the speed skating league.

The estimate for full interior renovations totals $3.5 million and the plans were submitted to U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey.

Councilor at Large Karen Kalinowksy and Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick voted in opposition because they want to see Community Preservation Act funds used for the endeavor. Kronick unsuccessfully motioned to table the request over concerns with the funding's terms.



Kalinowksy said she was worried about a portion of the council chamber's ceiling falling on her head.

"A lot of our buildings, our streets, our sidewalks, are falling apart," she said. "And I know everybody's saying, 'Oh it's only $500,000.' It's $500,000. It's a lot."

As the president of the Pittsfield girls' softball league, Ward 3 Councilor Kevin Sherman has gone through the CPA process for projects and emphasized that the funds are for organizations that don't have alternative sources.

"A lot of the organizations that put the requests in otherwise don't have money to get things done and that's what that fund was for," he said. "We have the money to match right now and tell the federal government 'Thank you for the $500,000, here's our share.'"

Sherman agreed that there is a ton of infrastructure work in the city and would sign off on the use of free cash for those projects as well.

"We're asking our organizations to fundraise all of the time and CPA is part of that for the organizations that have no other options," he said. "We have no other option here and I suggest we take it. It's the cleanest option."

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren said there is not a single person in Pittsfield who has not heard qualms about the loss of Pittsfield's Union Station, an elaborate building that once stood on West Street.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III reminded his colleagues that this is a city-owned building they are putting money back into.

"They're not making any new historic buildings. They don't build buildings like this anymore. It's a special place," he said.

"I don't know if skipping out on this free money is a good idea for us. I think it's important that we do what we can to bring the Springside House back to its glory."


Tags: springside house,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories