Letter: Homeless Families at MCLA a Misguided Effort

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

It has been 24 years since Mass MoCA opened and I'm still waiting for the seismic shift in our economy and downtown that MoCA's developers promised. Main and Eagle Streets are still largely empty and depressing. While MoCA has certainly helped in many ways, its presence has failed to impact our downtown. Why?

Because North Adams does not suffer from a quick-fix acute illness. But rather, it has a very real chronic disease, poverty. The cure for this disease is societal, far beyond the ability and efforts of any single poor city or single state economic development project, like MoCA.

One thing is certain, purposefully concentrating more poor people in already poor places appears to be the rule. Not to solve the problem, but to hide it from the more affluent places, while also giving them opportunity to feel benevolent about having found a humane solution to homelessness. It's no surprise that Salem (home of Salem State University) and Buzzards Bay (home of the Maritime Academy), both with median incomes of about $37,000, are already hosting homeless families at their college facilities.

President Birge's misguided effort to house 50 homeless families lacks any foresight of its larger impact on North Adams and any positive vision for a brighter future for North Adams. Could the bar be set any lower? Is that really the best use of those buildings to serve the college and our community? Does he really believe this would be temporary housing? In 18 months is he going to evict them and make them homeless again?

I am not heartless. I certainly have empathy for those 50 homeless families and I hope they find shelter ASAP. But, not here. I just don't accept that this is the only or best solution to the problem of homelessness.


According to the article in iBerkshires: "The college is estimated to receive just under $2.7 million for use of the currently vacant towers." Plus an unspecified amount for a contract ServiceNet to manage the buildings.

$2.7 million to house 50 families = $54,000 per family = $148 per night. My guess is that there are some struggling hotels and motels in the state, possibly even in Williamstown, that would love an 18-month contract for full occupancy with guaranteed payment. And, the state would save the money on the service contract!

Let's not forget that Alternative Living Centers, a housing program for recovering addicts, is located on Montana Street. Again, something critically needed. Yet, again, located in North Adams. Not to mention that the MCLA campus will be bound on two sides; homeless housing for 50 families on Church Street and a drug recovery housing project on Montana Street. That's not a great marketing plan for MCLA to attract more students. In fact, I suspect it will kill enrollment and the college.

This city has hosted a disproportionate number of poor people for 50 years. Let some other city/town, say one with a median income of $120,000.00, share and assume some of the burdens that poverty places on this city and hold it back from a more promising future.

Our downtown will never thrive until we have at least a modest demographic shift to include more people with disposable incomes, who live here year-round, to shop in stores and eat in restaurants.

This idea of importing more poor people is an awful and destructive idea for both MCLA and North Adams.

Peter May
North Adams, Mass.

 

 

 

 


Tags: homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Greylock School Project Moves Into Construction; Geothermal System Approved

By Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — The $65 million Greylock School Project has moved into construction phase, where it will stay for the next 18 months or so. 
 
Work has already started, as abatement of asbestos and lead paint at the old school are underway and trees and playground equipment removed for site preparation by general contractor Fontaine Bros.
 
"They hit the ground running," Jesse Saylor of TSKP Studio told the School Building Committee on Tuesday. "Fontaine's doing a nice job looking ahead and forecasting and ... we expect to get their schedule upcoming, as well as their breakdown of schedule of values, which is important because the [Massachusetts School Building Authority] reimburses the city based on that."
 
Timothy Alix of Collier's International, the owner's project manager, said the school construction will come in about $51 million and change.
 
"Our total budget is $65.3 million. We've processed invoices for roughly $4.4 million of that, we believe that roughly $4.2 [million] would be eligible for reimbursement, and then, based on the city's reimbursement rate, we expect a reimbursement of $3.4 [million]," Alix said. "It's right where we expected. Again, the biggest number here will be this construction line item, and we'll start seeing some invoices coming in as Fontaine builds out their schedule of values."
 
Saylor offered a presentation on the differences between vertical and horizontal geothermal systems, with the committee finally committing to horizontal. The savings are estimated at about $225,000; the project is expected to receive about $2.4 million in federal funds toward the alternative energy option. 
 
Committee members had been wary of the use of geothermal, which is being pushed by the state, but felt better after Tuesday's overview and voted unanimously to go with a horizontal system under the parking lot. 
 
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories