Pittsfield Board of Health Considers Looking Into Housing as Public Health Issue

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health is down two members and, when fully staffed, would like to tackle housing conditions as a public health issue.

On Wednesday June 7, the panel discussed its path forward in finding new recruits and in areas of effort.

Members recognized recent discussions about the city's deteriorating housing stock and code noncompliance as an important item to address.

"If people lose this housing or if people are displaced, there are so few opportunities right now to access other housing because it's so incredibly expensive," said board member Brad Gordon, the executive director and staff attorney for Berkshire County Regional Housing Authority.

"We've seen increases over the last three years that range from 25 to 75 percent rental increases.  It's dramatic so we've really got to maximize our existing stock, a lot of which is substandard just because I think it's about 70 percent of our housing stock was built prior to 1980."

Chair Bobbie Orsi reacted to data that Gordon sent out pertaining to the issue.

"Some of the wage and the housing costs are just so mismatched," she said.

This has been a prevalent issue in Pittsfield, with the city last year allocating $500,000 in America Rescue Plan Acts funds to establish an Affordable Housing Trust.

The board is welcome to a new member with experience in real estate management to provide insight into the issue.

Member Dr. Jeffrey Leppo said it always seems like a bad thing when the city has to tear down a building as opposed to having it addressed before it gets to that point.  He cited a discussion at the last BOH meeting about city houses going downhill and complaints about apartments.

"It sounds like those would obviously impact public health and we should try to be more proactive and it would be good to have people who want to help on that," Leppo said.


When the board is a five-member panel again, he said it would interesting to follow up on the issue of housing and health.

Gordon suggested having a cross-section presentation to get a holistic view of the many issues involved, pointing out that it would be educational to hear what the city and other organizations such as the Affordable Housing Trust are doing to address housing needs and how BOH can be involved.

"I feel like there's a connection between all of this kind of stuff," he said.

"I think one of the things that is helpful for us is just to be thinking about.  It could be in those small groups but sometimes it's also for public education too so we can be educated in the public can be educated at the same time by inviting people in and hearing about the good work."

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi agreed, adding that the department's role has been mostly signing off on demolitions rather than exploring other options.

He offered to have a member of the code enforcement team and possibly a person from the office of community development join the conversation.

Models that can be used to incentivize property owners away from letting structures decay such as Community Development Block Grant funding and systemic code enforcement.

Cambi was asked to bring a visual map of houses on the demolition list over the past few years to see a visual representation of the impact.

"I don't necessarily know what the right answer is and what to do," Orsi said.

"So I kind of count on the housing folks to maybe give us some suggestions around when we need to send letters or when we need to support processes that are moving forward but I think we're all very willing to do that."



 


Tags: housing,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories