Pittsfield Board Supports Expanding Police Co-Responder Hours

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Police Department would like to extend the emergency co-responders' hours to cover all police shifts.

On Monday, the Personnel Review Board voted to increase the work week from 35 hours to 37.5 hours. 

Interim Police Chief Thomas Dawley explained that the co-responders were hired for a 40-hour week Monday through Friday but changed to a "four to two" schedule to match the officers because it was more beneficial. This means they work four consecutive days and then have two days off.

Currently, there are two co-responders and one social worker assigned to the PPD as part of the program and Dawley would like to expand it.

"It was in the best interest of the department to work side by side with our patrol officers which are on a four and two schedule. So the difference is they were hired on a 35-hour schedule, now we're proposing a 37-and-a-half-hour weekly schedule that is parallel with the officers and currently the officers are on a four and two schedule," he said.

"When you look at the totality of the whole year, the average per week is 37 and a half hours and that's what is in alignment with the patrolman as well. We thought this would be more beneficial because we'll have all the shifts covered and weekends rather than having to work Monday through Friday and the weekends are not covered. So it's been working out very well."

The positions were approved about a year ago after the police killing of Miguel Estrella sparked a call for better mental health resources. The department's co-responder had just gotten off shift at the time of the incident.


The co-responders arrive on the scene for calls involving behavioral health disturbances alongside officers, acting as the primary liaison.

Duties include assessing the person to determine appropriate dispositions for services, arrests, diversion from arrests, diversion from unnecessary emergency department visits, or a combination of criminal justice and behavioral health treatment. The co-responders also facilitate police training on intervening in a behavioral health crisis.

It was pointed out that with the additional hours, the position's hourly rate will decrease slightly but the yearly salary will not change. Under the ordinance, co-responders are also eligible for overtime.

The positions were approved as Grade 13 salaries.

"Their salaries are not being adjusted downward, just the hourly rate is being adjusted so they are still being paid the same amount," Finance Director Matthew Kerwood clarified.

Dawley confirmed that there is no monetary loss.

There was little conversation from board members about the 2 1/2 increase. It will go to the City Council for final approval.

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council to See 10-Year Charter Review Report

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Following almost two years of work, the Charter Review Committee has made its recommendations to the City Council.

Tuesday's council agenda includes the committee's report dealing with governance items such as the charter objection, term limits, and financial procedures. Every 10 years, a panel reviews the City Charter, which defines the city's structure of government.

"The Charter Review Committee was established by city ordinance in May 2023. Its first meeting took place on August 7, 2023, under the direction of City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta," Chair Michael McCarthy's executive summary reads.

"Solicitor Pagnotta informed the committee that its mission is to offer recommendations to city government concerning the Charter."

The charter objection was the most discussed issue throughout the preview process.  Members determined "the City's interest in a functioning government is not served well by a Charter' Objection being made by a sole Councilor."

The nearly 50-page report proposes amendments to Article 2 Section 9C, Charter Objection, to allow for discussion, require three supporters, and be prohibited when it pertains to the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

"The Committee felt strongly that the budgetary process should not be held hostage to a Charter Objection. The process of approving a budget under the Charter involves months of hearings with firm calendar restrictions, leading to a budget that must be in place before each fiscal year begins," McCarthy wrote.

"A Charter Objection during this process would have the potential to disrupt and delay the budget being in place on July 1 of each fiscal year."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories