Berkshire Delegation Commends Advocacy Of Constituents for Rural School Aid Program

Staff Reports Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — State Senator Paul Mark, on behalf of the Berkshire Delegation, announced that funding for the Rural School Aid grant program has been raised to $15 million for Fiscal Year 2024, resulting in increases ranging from 30-210 percent for schools in the Berkshire, Hampden, Franklin and Hampshire District. 
 
The program provides financial assistance to the Commonwealth's most rural school districts.
 
"Making sure that students throughout our region can access a high-quality education, equal to their counterparts around the state, is extremely important to me and our regional delegation," said Senator Mark. "Tripling the amount of Rural School Aid that will flow to our local districts this year is going to help our rural communities significantly and represents a major milestone in progress to full funding."
 
The Berkshire legislative delegation worked together this session in coordination with several students and staff from local school districts to continue to build awareness and support for the unique needs of rural schools. That work culminated in an increase in Rural School Aid from $5.5 million in FY23 to $15 million for FY24.
 
The Rural School Aid grant program helps school districts with low population densities and lower-than- average incomes address fiscal challenges and take steps to improve efficiency. Rural School Aid can be used for a wide variety of purposes to support district operations, with priority given to efforts increasing regional collaboration, consolidation, or other strategies to improve long-term operational efficiency and effectiveness.
 
"The significant increase in rural school aid in this year's budget will go a long way in providing high- quality education for all students, regardless of what district they live in," said Rep. John Barrett III. "This investment is an important step in delivering on the recommendations included in the Rural Schools Report."
 
Administered by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), Rural School Aid is a source of funding separate from Chapter 70 aid.
 
According to DESE's 2018 study of rural schools, there was a 12.4 percent  spending gap between rural and nonrural districts for in-district students. The study found that the average in-district expenditures for students enrolled in all non-vocational school districts was $17,293 in FY20, the most recent year for which this data is available. Multiplying this amount by 12.4 percent results in the identification of a per pupil spending gap of $2,144. Applying this amount to the 27,219 students identified as attending rural districts
in the same DESE study, the total spending gap for rural schools equals $58,357,536. The Commission on the Fiscal Health of Rural School Districts recommended at least $60 million be appropriated in annual aid.
 
"This $15 million is a very big step in our collective fight to level the playing field for rural communities. I am proud of the results we are seeing with the Rural School Aid Program, and I am sure this project will continue to be a positive force for education in the Berkshires," said Rep. William "Smitty" Pignatelli, "While this is a great first step, I am eager to see this funding flow continue towards our rural schools down the line."
 
For FY24's Rural School Aid, DESE identified districts eligible based on their student density of not more than 35 students per square mile and their per capita income of less than $58,820 per capita, according to 2020 data from the Department of Revenue.
 
Based on these criteria, there are 68 school districts that are eligible to receive rural school aid in FY2024. Senator Mark represents a largely rural, western Massachusetts district spanning 57 communities in Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden Counties. Those schools to receive funding within his
district are:
 
  • Berkshire Hills Regional School District, FY24 $388,000; FY23 $154,000; 151 percent  increase over FY23
  • Chesterfield-Goshen School District, FY24 $78,000; FY23 $29,000; 168 percent  increase over FY23
  • Central Berkshire Regional School District, FY24 $1,325,000; FY23 $532,000; 149 percent  increase over FY23
  • Clarksburg School District, FY24 $120,000; FY23 $49,000; 144 percent  increase over FY23
  • Conway School District, FY24 $26,000; FY23 $14,000; 85 percent  increase over FY23
  • Florida School District, FY24 $63,000; FY23 $26,000; 142 percent  increase over FY23
  • Gateway Regional School District, FY24 $832,000; FY23 $300,000; 177 percent  increase over FY23
  • Hampshire Regional School District in Westhampton, FY24 $313,000; FY23 $134,000; 133 percent increase over FY23
  • Hancock School District, FY24 $33,000; FY23 $11,000; 200 percent  increase over FY23
  • Hawlemont School District, FY24 $90,000; FY23 $35,000; 157 percent  increase over FY23
  • Hoosac Valley Regional School District, FY24 $228,000; FY23 $93,000; 145 percent  increase over FY23
  • Lee School District, FY24 $32,000; FY23 $12,000; 166 percent  increase over FY23
  • Mohawk Trail School District, FY24 $621,000; FY23 $262,000; 137 percent  increase over FY23
  • Mount Greylock Regional School District, FY24 $286,000; FY23 $92,000; 210 percent  increase over FY23
  • Rowe School District, FY24 $20,000; FY23 $7,000; 185 percent  increase over FY23
  • Savoy School District, FY24 $17,000; FY23 $13,000; 30 percent  increase over FY23
  • Southern Berkshire Regional School District, FY24 $256,000; FY23 $101,000; 153 percent  increase over FY23
  • Southwick-Tolland-Granville Regional School District, FY24 $385,000; FY23 $141,000; 173 percent  increase over FY23
  • Westhampton School District, FY24 $35,000; FY23 $14,000; 150 percent  increase over FY23
  • Whately School District, FY24 $42,000; FY23 $14,000; 200 percent  increase over FY23
  • Williamsburg School District, FY24 $109,000; FY23 $49,000; 122 percent  increase over FY23
  • Worthington School District, FY24 $43,000; FY23 $15,000; 186 percent  increase over FY23
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

PHS Air and Water Quality Within Accepted Levels

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Air and water quality testing at Pittsfield High School came back within acceptable levels, and the administration is open to additional testing. 

Last week, the School Committee accepted test results on the facility that has sat on East Street for nearly 100 years.  The report was done in collaboration with Atlas Technical Consultants and the Pittsfield Water Department. 

Readings were "acceptable" in all tested locations, and there are recommendations for monitoring humidity, replacing equipment, and additional air monitoring when needed.  Some retesting needed to be done, and a couple of sink faucets were removed in the process. 

"If you want every room sampled, we can do it," Mayor Peter Marchetti said in response to Ciara Batory's concerns about air sampling in only a handful of rooms. 

"This is the report that came back, and this report does not show that children are in danger."

Limited indoor air quality readings were done in rooms 102, 103, 104, and 116 on June 31.  Air quality testing was also done two years ago. 

Humidity levels were slightly above American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers guidelines in rooms 103 and 104; monitoring and dehumidification are recommended. 

The report says that mold spores captured in rooms 103 and 104 likely originated from an indoor source.  Custodial deep cleaning was done right before samples were taken, and a retest showed levels within an acceptable range. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories