image description

Pittsfield School Committee Sees Breakdown of FY23 Expenditures

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Pittsfield Public Schools spent a total of $135.8 million on education in fiscal year 2023. 

While the majority is attributed to the budget approved by the School Committee, this also includes a healthy amount of state aid and funds from other city departments.

On Wednesday, the committee received a presentation on education spending outside of the district budget and an update on the governor's proposed budget for fiscal 2025.

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke said the administration wants to make sure that the committee and public are aware that there is a lot of education spending that is not confined to the school operating budget.

"As part of the Massachusetts Education Reform Act, school districts in Massachusetts are required to report annually to [the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education] on something called the financial end-of-year report," she said.

"In Pittsfield, we have expenditures on three main sources: there's the School Committee budget that you approve each year, there's city of Pittsfield departmental budgets that we're going to talk more about as part of this presentation, and then there's our federal grants, state grants and revolving funds which over the last few years has grown significantly in part because of the ESSER (Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief) funds."

Some $22.7 million (17 percent) of the expenditures were from federal and state grants and revolving funds, $40.8 million (30 percent) was from city departmental expenditures, and $72.3 million (53 percent) was expended from the School Committee budget in FY23.

Some of the largest buckets of spending include:

  • insurance for current employees: $13.1M
  • school choice and charter tuition costs: $7.5M
  • employer retirement contributions to Pittsfield Retirement Board: $5.4M
  • insurance for retired school department employees: $4.5M
  • maintenance of school buildings and grounds: $1.8M
  • long term debt n school construction: $1.7M
  • student resource officers:  $171,000

The $1.8 million spent on the schools' buildings and grounds maintenance includes work from the Building Maintenance Department and the Parks Department's work on athletic fields and parking lots.

These numbers come from the Net School Spending Agreement

"Any municipal district is required to have a Net School Spending Agreement. They're actually approved by the commissioner of education," Behnke said.

"Ours was from 2004. We looked at numbers again in about 2016. When we looked at the agreement again, we decided not to make any changes to the language of the agreement but we did make some changes to how some of the numbers were calculated and what was included as part of the overall agreement at that time."


Of the Building Maintenance Department's one million dollar salary budget for FY24, more than $750,000, or 70 percent, is attributed to education. For the Parks Department, the more than $570,000 salary budget has nearly $230,000 attributed to education, or 40 percent.

Behnke explained that this also includes plowing of the parking lots in the wintertime.

Under the governor's budget, Pittsfield's state aid will increase by nearly $650,000 in FY25. In FY24, the city received $6.5 million more in aid, for a total of about $60 million.

Revised information showed that the city dipped down into a Group 10 low-income category, which results in dramatically less Chapter 70 funding, which is a hundreds of dollar difference per student.

Behnke reported that Pittsfield is right on the cusp, as the cutoff for Group 11 is 70 percent and the city is 69.96 percent. The administration received low-income student information from the state and is looking at it compared to the district's information to make sure that no students were missed in the count.

"It is not going to take a lot of students," she said. "If we find a handful of students it's possible that we can we can go back into group 11 which would give us approximately another $2 million."


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   school budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Peru Selectman Pays $3K Penalty for Conflict of Interest

PERU, Mass. — A Select Board member has been fined $3,000 for helping create a paid town job he intended to apply for, and then worked in.
 
Edward Munch has paid a $3,000 civil penalty for violating the conflict of interest law by participating in creating the paid maintenance position he intended to apply for and then working in the new job while still on the Select Board. The State Ethics Commission approved a Disposition Agreement in which Munch admitted to the violations, paid the civil penalty, and waived his right to a public hearing.
 
During a December 2024 Select Board meeting, Munch asserted the need for a maintenance person at Town Hall. The need for the position was discussed at the following meeting and Munch said he would like to apply for it. During subsequent Select Board meetings, Munch continued to participate in discussions relating to the position, including its job description, schedule, and pay rate. The Select Board ultimately approved the position, with Munch abstaining from the vote.
 
After the maintenance position was publicly posted in the summer of 2025, Munch applied for it. He and another candidate were interviewed by the two other Select Board members, who subsequently voted to appoint Munch to the position. 
 
Munch worked in the position, which remained under the supervision of the Select Board, until March 2026, when he left the position after being notified the State Ethics Commission was investigating the matter. He earned just over $3,000 in the position.
 
The conflict of interest law prohibits municipal employees from participating in their official capacity in matters in which they have a reasonably foreseeable financial interest. Although Munch abstained from voting on the maintenance position, he violated this prohibition each time he discussed the position substantively as a Select Board member. Munch also violated the law's prohibitions against municipal board members serving in positions appointed by and under the supervision of their own board and its prohibition against municipal employees holding a financial interest in a contract made by the municipality.
 
"When an elected public official encourages and takes part in government actions they know will create an economic opportunity for themself, the public has cause to ask whether those actions served the official's personal financial interest rather than the public interest," said State Ethics Commission Executive Director David A. Wilson. "Not engaging in such self-serving conduct is essential if elected officials are to build and maintain public confidence in the integrity of their public service and avoid the serious negative consequences of violating the conflict of interest law."   
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories