Letter: Wahconah Park: Invest in Future, Celebrate Past.

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I've had many people ask for my opinion regarding the situation. Phone has been non-stop notifications, tags, and texts since the announcement. I have worked at Wahconah Park since I became an adult. I have been to nearly every game at the ballpark except for 3: senior prom, my wedding (still ended up there), and my son's godparents' wedding. I am the longest-tenured broadcaster in FCBL history and Wahconah Park's history. I'd wager I have seen the ballpark more than any other person since 2011. I know the ballpark. I also know it's flaws.

Considering where the press box is located, there is no person who has taken more risk than me. I called that press box my second home for over a decade. I often joke that the first time you climb up, you get SLS, or Shaky Leg Syndrome, due to anyone's fear of heights to spike at the attempt to climb the ladder up itself. I am very afraid of heights, but can run up that ladder and walk way in record time. I can also tell you that I felt that the walkway was very wobbly and unsafe at times.

The past two years I have broadcasted under a pop-up tent in order to call games. Given weather, the hot sun beaming on the equipment that I myself provide, and rain that was, at times, impossible to be clear from, I feel like I can vouch that the ballpark is currently in no shape to hosting games; from my experience, the players experience with a grass field that needs to be turfed, and the diluted fan experience considering the restrictions placed on the Suns due to the situation.

Let me be clear: I wholeheartedly agree with the Suns' decision to pause their season until a reasonable accommodation can be filled, i.e. a new ballpark. Move locations? There is nowhere in Berkshire County that would generate a profit, with the need of concessions merch to drive the team towards the black. Renovating? It's like a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound. The grandstands have lived a long life, but no amount of renovating would either be worth it nor be sustainable for as long. Same with turfing the field, for longevity, cost, and accessibility for other opportunities. Zero added risk to player injuries, as shown in the study done in one of the committee meetings.

If we, as a city, love to talk about our history so much, then instead of being known as "Pittsfield: The Land of Missed Opportunity," it can be known for a city the invests in itself, a place the celebrates it's history, not dwells in it. This isn't the '80s anymore, GE isn't here, a lot of things aren't here anymore. So let's invest in our future while celebrating our past.

Yes, I get the comparison of the decision back around the late '90s to early '00s. I also understand the tax implications that would most likely occur. If we don't move forward with this, then we also can't complain there's nothing to do around here.



Wahconah Park can be used for more than just baseball. I played football on that field throughout my youth. Who remembers the Wing Fling? My stomach yearns for some wings from Friend's Grille (when they were open), Patrick's, and Old Forge. Boxing, wrestling, concerts, all relatively inexpensive considering the alternatives an hour away East or West.

As for this year, "why are the Suns involved in stuff at the park if they are abandoning Pittsfield?" First off, let's not be so closed-minded and use some critical thinking. The Suns aren't abandoning Pittsfield, they simply cannot operate as if everything is normal with beyond normal circumstances. The next season the Suns play at Wahconah Park, they will have the most seasons played by a single franchise in the city's history. That seems like they're invested in staying. The team is going out of their way to still attempt activities this summer, as they still want to have community engagement in Pittsfield. That seems like they're invested in staying. They are still trying to provide fireworks on the 4th of July this year, tens of thousands of dollars out of their own pocket, with the one incentive being to keep the people of Pittsfield happy. That seems like they're invested in staying. To put it short and sweet: the Suns aren't leaving on their own accord anytime soon.

The mayor is doing what they can. The Suns are doing what they can. The restoration committee are doing what they can. This is a big decision for Pittsfield, and rightfully so. Our Rome is Wahconah Park. And just the same: it won't be built in a day. I'm not talking as a mouthpiece for the team; I'm talking as a citizen of Pittsfield that wants what's best for Pittsfield.

We all know that we are having issues with funding it, whether a tax implication, crowd funding, grants, or, maybe unlikely, the next Powerball/Mega Millions winner. We all know it's hard and going to be hard to get this done, but what is triumph without struggle? Struggle for me has been under a tent in the elements the past few years trying to tell a story on air for hundreds of hours.

Selfishly, I want the triumph to be my son growing up to want to go to the ballpark and have his dad tell him a story, whether on air or in person. Some of my wife's favorite memories are with her dad at Wahconah Park. I want my son to see a clash of two titan teams going into battle, where every crack of the bat breeds excitement. Every cheer to be made with passion, every thirst for thrill be quenched by either a phenomenal play and/or a cold soda. A place where everyone comes out with an experience to share with friends, family, and classmates. I want my son to have a childhood better than mine.

If you build it, they will come.

Billy Madewell
Pittsfield, Mass.

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Select Board Tables JMJ Negotiations

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tensions swirled at Monday's Select Board meeting in light of conversations to dissolve the Baker Hill Road District.

The meeting started with public comment, including from Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings, who emphasized that without a dissolution of the road district, the potential sale and redevelopment with the mall would fall through. 

He said the town expects about $760,000 in fiscal 2027 from the road district plus normal taxation. With redevelopment and no district, total income is projected to be around $1.1 million by 2029, he said, implying about a $300,000 annual surplus versus the status quo. He said he provided those calculations to the board.

Keeping the road district alive is not a compromise, Grogan said, referring to a proposal floated by the board last week to facilitate the mall's sale and work with the road district to reduce its tax assessment.

"This mentality by previous select boards and the Baker Hill Road District is what led the property to its current condition," he said. "Further, the Baker Hill Road District has every motive to make this compromise work, as their alternative is dissolution and non-existence. This practice is inherently in bad shape, and JMJ will not entertain any circumstance where the Baker Hill Road District continues to exist. 

"JMJ is inclined and trying to be treated like any other business in the town, and taxes such just like every other major shopping center in the state, keeping the Baker Hill Road District in place will continue to discourage redevelopment, and in this moment will break the delicate balance that has been negotiated between JMJ, Lanesborough, and [buyer Cypress Equities] to the point where the project is no longer feasible, and the only choice is litigation." 

Lyndon Moors, chair of the Finance Committee and recent appointee to the district's Prudential Committee, spoke personally in favor of keeping the district. He said it currently provides more than $500,000 per year to the town, which helps fund two police officers, fire and police vehicles, and over $100,000 per year for the Department of Public Works. He said losing that revenue could significantly impact town services and future budgets, especially as free cash may be lower going into FY28. 

He suggests downsizing the district's budget to reduce the tax burden on the mall and Target, which owns its building separately, while still maintaining revenue for the town. The board should let the litigation play out and not be too hasty in making decisions, he said.

"I think it is unlikely that we will see $1.1 million from the mall property without Baker Hill Road District in FY29. That's what I just heard. We are in FY27 right now. I think that's very unlikely two fiscal years from now, that we are enjoying the tax benefits to the tune of $1.1 million. So I would encourage the Select Board to put on the brakes a little bit, continue to be thoughtful, responsive, deliberative, and let's continue to do what's best for the town," Moors said.

Moors mentioned a Facebook post posted by Blake Mensing, one of the owners of JMJ, on the town group with documents that could be relevant to the meeting, saying it looked as though he was trying to negotiate in public. Mensing said it was an exercise of his First Amendment rights and an attempt to provide transparency to residents, especially since JMJ's opportunity to speak is limited to public comment.

Vice Chair Julie Baker suggested the compromise, said she and board member Michael Murphy have had "very robust and constructive discussions with the district."

"The purpose of it was to see if we could work with them to lessen the special tax burden that the district imposes on the owners, all owners of the mall properties, and while keeping the special tax district in place to preserve the police, fire, police car, and road maintenance services that we received from that special taxation," she said. 

Baker said the district is also interested in giving the road to the state, if the state allows. They also reviewed the district's $800,000 budget and discussed reductions but have not made concrete decisions.

"We find a great deal of interest in helping cut the budget there so that it would reduce the tax burden as well," she said. "So we're not ready with specific numbers yet on that, but there's certainly the willingness to make some major cuts into that budget."

Chair Deborah Maynard said she wants to dissolve the BHRD and that she would not want them to go ahead with the discussions.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories