image description
Grandchildren, great-grandchildren and great-grandchildren pose at the house Mateusz 'Matthew' Kolis built in 1923-24.
image description
Arriving relatives add their names to the reunion poster.
image description
image description
The wedding photo of Blanche Kolis, one of Matthew and Catherine's 13 children.
image description
The house boasts a 1923 sign to indicate when construction started.
image description

Kolis Family Celebrates 100 Years in Homestead Grandfather Built

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Grandson William Kolis, who grew up across the street, recounts some of the family's story at Saturday's reunion.  Behind him is his grandmother's 90th birthday proclamation signed in 1985. 
ADAMS, Mass. — More than three dozen members of the Kolis family stretching across at least three generations on Saturday celebrated 100 years in the home their dziadziu and babci built. 
 
Mateusz (Matthew) Kolis and Katarzyna (Catherine) Strzepek sought their futures in America in the early 1900s and found work in the mills. The big house near the top of steep Haggerty Street was built by Matthew Kolis as a home for their 13 children. Eleven of their children would give them 36 grandchildren and 57 great-grandchildren and numerous great-great-grandchildren.
 
"We lived across the street and my dad, like dziadziu, built the house we lived in," said William "Bill" Kolis. "For me crossing that street was like going to Poland. It was language I didn't speak, with people I didn't really understand."
 
Kolis said he's been looking into the history of the family as his sister, Gail Kolis Sellers, has been documenting the genealogy.
 
"In my mind, genealogy is the skeleton. We know where everybody is. History is the story and the story of this family is fantastic," he said. 
 
Matthew Kolis' shares a birthday with the nation he came to call home, though the July 4 date is a little iffy as its listed as his baptismal date. Bill Kolis, who was recorded as he shared the family story, said babies were usually baptized the day they were born because the death rate for infants in Poland was so high at the time. 
 
The family patriarch was 14 when he arrived in America in 1906, following his older sister, Zofia Kolis Les, who arrived five years earlier. The Kolises lived in a poverty-stricken region of Poland then under Austrian rule, and the massive textile mills here were recruiting thousands of workers overseas. 
 
Millions of Poles came to the United States during a great wave of immigration between 1870 and 1914. This would be stemmed after World War I as America sought to limit immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe. 
 
"There was a strong movement from Congress when they passed legislation restricting the number of people who come from Poland, because those who lived here believe that the Polish people were polluting and diluting the bloodline of the country," said Bill Kolis, commenting that history doesn't repeat "but it rhymes."
 
"I hope we have just as much respect for the immigrants that are coming in today," said another family member. "You know, it was tough back then. It's tough now. Well, you gotta give them a break."
 
America represented opportunity, said Kolis. "It was the young, the brave, and it's really interesting in our family, in light of some of the discussions, it was the women who came first. ...  he came here but there was already a Kolis woman here. There's strength in our women and I think I've heard that all through this day."
 
Matthew Kolis would marry Katherine and become a loom fixer in the Berkshire Hathaway mills.
 
The family didn't know much about their Polish relatives or how their grandparents had lived in the old country. Bill Kolis thinks it was because of the way Poland was treated in the history of the word: "the invasions, the borders changing, and when people came over, they were afraid to talk about their country. They were afraid they would be picked up and sent back."
 
Matthew never went back but Catherine Kolis did, twice, after his death in 1957. Her family had survived World War II but was still destitute. A photo she brought back of one her relatives barefoot in a sack dress with a young child had written on the back in Polish, "do you have any clothes or shoes?"
 
Saturday's reunion was the first major one since Catherine's 90th birthday in 1985, not long before her passing, said Gail Sellers. A birthday proclamation poster for that reunion was filled with signatures of the family members who had attended and Sellers had a new poster for everyone to sign this time.  
 
The house has been owned since 2004 by grandson Daniel Kolis, whose father, Francis, had previously been the owner. The home had been separated into two apartments but he has since returned it to a single-family home. 
 
"I'm not sure what's going happen after this. My two daughters, one lives in New York, in Albany, and the other's down in West Haven, Conn.," he said. "There's a lot of Kolises here. Might have to find one to buy it."
 

Tags: genealogy,   local history,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Fire Deliberates Next Steps on Retirement Mandate

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

ADAMS, Mass. — The Fire Department is seeking clarifications on how the state's mandatory retirement age for firefighters will affect its older members who aren't involved in firefighting. 

Earlier this month, the Fire District questioned the impact of the retirement mandate after four Dalton firefighters, including the interim chief, had to retire.

During a workshop on Monday, board members said they will seek a legal opinion regarding the district's available options. With Chief John Pansecchi set to retire, First Assistant Engineer David Lennon intends to run for the chief position, while Edward Capeless plans to run for Lennon's current role.

Pansecchi went over some of the department's policies, stating that members 65 and older are just support members and are exterior only (as opposed to entering a building).

The board is looking to also clarify its insurance related to what ages it covered. 

"We have documentation that in 2021 our insurance company said that we were covered for everything, but after 70 we weren't covered for heart circulation. We're trying to verify the current age," Pansecchi said, stating the company may have changed its policies.

He also would like to know if the district creates a separate support person, what would be needed to make sure they cover their insurance bases.

Lennon brought examples from other communities which have had to deal with the mandatory retirements and how they used home rule petitions through the Legislature to keep older firefighters on. Some had done it by department and some by individuals, and got district meeting votes before applying. 

They plan to ask state Rep. John Barrett III to guide them on a home-rule petition as well as look at sample language from others who have applied.

Lennon suggested having fire company members who are 65 and older not wear fire gear at a scene,  but rather a coat or vest that will show they are affiliated with the department.

"What we would like to do, to keep the Prudential Committee comfortable with what's going on, because we do want to have safety for all of our firefighters," he said. "The safety of my guys that are inside are directly affected by the person I have outside. So he's making judgement calls, and he's getting resources that we need, and there needs to be somebody to do that.

"And when take some of those people away that can do that, but can't be interior, we remove more interior people, which is not advantageous."

He said Capeless is a valuable asset as he usually is outside of the fire.

"We just had a structure fire, and the way that worked was, we got to work. We took over command, stayed outside. He did the radio work. He got resources while the people were inside. Now, if we take that out of that picture, that means one of the people working [inside] has to now go outside, and so that's where we come down to," Lennon said.

The team is also working with legal counsel to find out if support members should be driving the vehicles and what other liability exposures there might be.

Pansecchi said the department is comprised of a core of 15 members and will lose one once he leaves next month, and the loss of another five affected by the mandate will have a deleterious impact.

"Thirty-three on the roster. If you remove these five individuals, bring us down to 28 out of those, one's on regular military leave, two apprentices have not been showing up and may be removed in their future, one of the engineers has not responded to a call in months," he said. "That brings us down to 23 then we have about eight members, not including the above members, that have made less than 10 percent of the calls." 

Board members agreed to start the uniform differential with the older members and said  they will consider next once they have more information.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories