Governor Nominates Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — Governor Maura T. Healey nominated Justice Amy L. Blake to serve as the next Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court. 
 
If confirmed, Justice Blake would replace Chief Justice Mark Green, who recently retired after serving nearly 23 years on the Appeals Court, and seven as Chief. Justice Blake will now continue forward to the Governor's Council for confirmation.  
 
"Justice Blake's decade of service on the Massachusetts Appeals Court and additional experience with the Probate and Family Court and in private practice make her an outstanding candidate for Chief Justice," said Governor Healey. "I'm proud to nominate her and appreciate the Governor's Council's review of her nomination. I'm also grateful for Chief Justice Mark Green for his leadership on the Appeals Court."  
 
The Appeals Court is the state's intermediate appellate court. The Appeals Court is a court of general appellate jurisdiction, which means that the justices review decisions that trial judges from the several Departments of the Trial Court have already made in many different kinds of cases. The Appeals Court also has jurisdiction over appeals from final decisions of three State agencies: the Appellate Tax Board, the Industrial Accident Board and the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board. The Appeals Court consists of a chief justice and 24 associate justices. 
 
Justice Amy Lyn Blake has served as Associate Justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court since 2014, when she was appointed by Governor Deval Patrick. 
 
Prior to the Appeals Court, Justice Blake served as an Associate Justice on the Probate and Family Court from 2008-2014. She was previously a Partner at Casner & Edwards, LLP, an Associate and Partner at White, Inker, Aronson, an Associate at Yasi & Yasi, PC and an Assistant District Attorney for the Middlesex County District Attorney's Office. She also served as an adjunct faculty member at New England Law. 
 
Justice Blake is the District One Director of the National Association of Women Judges, a fellow of the Massachusetts Bar Foundation and an Associate Editor of the Massachusetts Law Review. She served as co-chair of the Board of Overseers of the Boston Bar Journal and actively serves on a number of committees, including the Trial Court's Public Outreach Committee and the Supreme Judicial Court's Committee on Judicial Guidelines for Self-Represented Litigants. 
 
Justice Blake has previously been named Jurist of the Year by the Middlesex County Bar Association, and Lawyer of the Year by the North Shore Women Lawyers' Association.  She has also received the Distinguished Jurist Award from the Massachusetts Association of Women Lawyers. 
 
Justice Blake graduated from the University of Rochester and New England Law. While in law school, she was named a New England Scholar and awarded the Amos L. Taylor Award for Excellence in Achievement. She lives in Peabody with her husband.  
 
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Crane Drops Challenge to Dalton Land Sale

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — The sale of the land known as the Bardin property is no longer being challenged. 
 
Dicken Crane of Holiday Farm, the highest bidder on the property, withdrew his lawsuit and a citizen petition requesting the board award him the sale, recognizing that a reversal was unlikely after the deed had already been signed.
 
The Select Board's decision in December to sell the last 9.15 acres of land to Thomas and Esther Balardini, the third highest bidder, sparked outrage from several residents resulting in a heated meeting to sign the quitclaim deed. Crane was the highest bidder by $20,000.
 
The board swiftly had the deed signed on Dec. 22, following its initial vote on Nov. 10 to award the parcel to the Balardinis, despite citizen outcry against the decision during a meeting on Nov. 23.  
 
Crane claimed he wrote a letter to the board of his intention to appeal its decision. However, once the deed was signed a month later, it was too late for him to do anything. 
 
"My question is, why were they in such a hurry to push this through, even though there were many people asking, 'explain to us why this is in the best interest in the town,' when they really had no explanation," Crane said on Wednesday.
 
Litigation is expensive and the likelihood of success to get it changed once the deed was signed is minimal, he said. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories