DALTON, Mass. — There is uncertainty surrounding implications accessory dwelling units will have on the water and sewer rates.
The town does not currently have any ADUs built yet, but one has recently been permitted. The town passed its ADU bylaw in 2022, which had been in development since October 2020.
It is unclear if the topic of how the town would set its sewer rates was discussed during the bylaws development. The tax collector does not have any rates for this type of housing.
On Aug. 6, the state updated its law to allow AUDs without local zoning approval if they meet certain requirements. This state law would not go into effect until February 2025.
The Fire District, a separate governing body that oversees the Water Department, has started discussions on how to set up the water rate structure for all types of ADUs.
There are three main types being considered: ADUs up to 900 square feet attached to the main house, tiny houses under 400 square feet on a foundation, and mobile tiny houses on wheels, Planning Board member Don Davis said during the Board of Water Commissioners meeting on Tuesday.
ADUs up to 900 square feet and attached to the main house and tiny houses are permitted in town.
The Planning Board has been considering amending the bylaw to allow mobile tiny homes,
The efforts to amend the bylaw have been met with obstacles surrounding its tax implications. More information here.
"With us as a Planning Board, we're trying to figure out what we need to put in for stipulations, and this is why the town planner has probably reached out to you guys," Davis said.
A lot of people are assuming that the town and water department can just hook up the water or sewer and be good to go, he said.
However, there are a lot of things that need to be considered, including meeting the state Department of Environmental Protection regulations, backflow prevention, among other things, Davis said.
The board is trying to figure out what to include in its bylaw, whether it is curb-stop, connection fees, or other matters associated with water and sewer regulations.
"Just to review that, with the thought in mind that we need to make sure we protect the water system," Water Commissioner Michael Kubicki said.
Once that is figured out, the district needs to adjust the regulations and rates based on the different types of units, he said.
With an ADU on a foundation, there would probably be a sewer connection and a water connection with its own independent curve stop.
When it becomes a sewer or a well system, then you also have to worry about conservation or the health department to figure out what the septic system is big enough to handle it, Davis said.
"We're just looking for the impact fee to the people that are building or buying these and how they're going to be implemented because it's pretty unclear," he said.
"Maybe they think they could just put a hose to it, and then who knows what happens. So trying to connect all the bases."
With a mobile unit, if they connect a hose to it and it is there over the winter, they would need to put some kind of heat cable on it or leave it running for it not to freeze, Water Superintendent Bob Benlien said.
So there are different questions that come up, like whether or not these units need to be metered, he said.
ADUs on a foundation should have a separate category from mobile units, Benlien said.
"If they're placed on a slab and they're attached to the ground, then I think they should have their own service connection," he said.
Mobile units should have the same guidelines similar to what a mobile park has, Benlien said.
It would come out of the ground and need to be frost resistant, Davis agreed.
Right, Benlien said, it would have to have something like skirting and insulation around it.
This is something the district needs to talk about further in detail during a future meeting when potential options have been thought about further, Kubicki said.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more