image description
The Pittsfield Board of Health is debating about joining an initiative that would prohibit sales to tobacco and nicotine products, like the vapes above, to anyone born after a certain date.

Pittsfield Health Board Considering Nicotine Free Generation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Thirteen Massachusetts communities have joined the "Nicotine-Free Generation." Could Pittsfield do the same?

This was the question during the Board of Health meeting earlier this month. The board will discuss a possible path forward that includes community input at its next meeting.

"Clearly, I think, as a board, there's a sentiment that this is attractive as a public health service," Dr. Jeffrey Leppo said, followed by agreement from other members.

Maureen Buzby, tobacco inspection coordinator in Melrose, presented information about the Nicotine-Free Generation movement. The policy adopted by the municipalities prohibits the sale of tobacco or e-cigarette products to individuals born on or after Jan. 1, 2000 or 2004.

A bill filed in the Legislature would prohibit tobacco sales of all but FDA-approved nicotine replacement therapy for anyone born in 2006. Those individuals are now 19, two years under the legal age for purchases. If the bill goes through, they will not be able to buy nicotine products in their lifetime. 

The bill does not penalize possession, or current adult users, as its goal is to target the tobacco industry. 

"We know that tobacco use is still the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S. Every year, almost half a million Americans die prematurely of smoking-related disease, and billions of dollars are spent on smoking-related illness," Buzby said. 

"Over the past several decades, local boards of health have led the way in adopting regulations that improve the health of their residents. No one knows that more than you folks."

She pointed out that local boards made a campaign for a smoke-free workplace law two decades ago against extreme pushback until there was a critical mass and it became the law.

In 2023, the board updated Pittsfield's tobacco ordinance to clarify the definition for blunt wraps, raise the minimum price requirement for cigars, and adopt state guidance on fines for violations.

The ordinance had last been amended in 2019 before Gov. Charlie Baker signed an Act Modernizing Tobacco Control, which imposed new restrictions on the sale of nicotine vaping, flavored vaping, and tobacco products.

Buzby said that while local policies, which she is proud to have worked on, moved the needle a bit, people still smoke.

"They're still affected by secondhand smoke, vaping in our schools remains a serious issue, and the tobacco industry continues to develop and market new, appealing, cheap, discrete, and high nicotine content products like nicotine pouches with 14, 15, or 18 milligrams of nicotine in each pouch," she added.

"Compare that to a pack of cigarettes with 24 milligrams in the entire pack, or the vape pen that looks just like a highlighter, or the vape device with an LED screen that tells you how many puffs you have left to trigger you to buy another one or the newest vape with built-in video games — Yes, play Mario Brothers while you vape."

She explained that no one who is already 21 would lose their privilege to buy tobacco products, as this policy only affects those who cannot currently legally purchase the products.

"It's a slow rollout that allows retailers to adjust to slightly lower tobacco sales over an extended period of time, unlike the flavor ban that removed all flavored products from retailer shelves on day one," Buzby said.



Almost two years ago, she started discussing the possibility of introducing this to cities and towns in her collaborative. Communities then held public hearings with as many as 100 attendees.

A lawsuit had been filed against Brookline for its 2020 approval of an NFG bylaw. Last year, the Supreme Judicial Court unanimously decided it was within Brookline's right to pass the bylaw.  

Stoneham became the first board of health in the world to adopt NFG, Buzby reported, followed by Wakefield and Melrose.

"The goal, as it was for the smoke-free workplace law, is to get enough cities and towns to adopt NFG that it becomes more likely to be adopted in state law. Those sponsors, one from the Senate and one from the House, are working on language for a statewide bill as we speak tonight," she said.

"This policy starts to move us towards the end of tobacco use and addiction, which has harmed millions and cost billions for decades."

There was some discussion about collaborating with other towns and regional partners partnered with talks of leading Berkshire County by example.

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi said the next step would be for board members to gather education and feedback before the city holds its own hearings.

"My direction is to say that we do this regardless of if other municipalities are on board," he said, adding that cooperation from other county health boards would be great.

During open microphone, local business owner Michael Lipton voiced concern for the ban's effect on overall sales. He owns four retail sites that all sell tobacco products.

"What I want to just stress is that it does affect more than tobacco," he said, explaining that there are additional sales that are a result of people coming in for tobacco products, and if they are only banned in Pittsfield, people will go elsewhere.

"Just to be clear for the record, we're not there yet," Chair Roberta Elliott clarified, as the board is just beginning to look into this.


Tags: tobacco regulations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories