Berkshire Village Owners Owes Cheshire Back Taxes

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
CHESHIRE, Mass. — In addition to residents complaints about Berkshire Village's deteriorating condition, the mobile home park also owes the town roughly $21,000 in back taxes.  
 
Town Administrator Jennifer Morse told the Board of Selectmen last week that she discovered tenants are paying $12 per month in personal property tax, which the ownership has not paid to the town for the past 18 months. 
 
"According to the email that I was given, Berkshire Village only owes 18 months. Prior ownership was paying," Morse said. 
 
The park's owners applied for a lodging permit with the health inspector, but Morse directed the inspector not to issue the permit until the town received payment.
 
"I have contacted ownership. I was able to get an email address and contacted ownership and let him know that this outstanding tax is due and that we need to have payment along with the $750 for their lodging permits as well," Morse said. 
 
The owners are supposed to turn in a sheet showing tenancy and amounts to the tax collector and Board of Health monthly "instead of yearly, or however it's been billed in the past. I'm really not sure," she said. 
 
"So, I did share that with him as well, and explained in my email what the process was, and asked him to call him so we could discuss, I have not heard from him yet." 
 
In February, several Berkshire Village residents attended a board meeting to express their frustration with the mobile home park's unsafe conditions, citing issues with the septic system, outdated electric service, and unmaintained roads. More information here. 
 
On Tuesday, Morse informed the board that she had met with the Attorney General's Office a couple of times because the office had received a resident complaint. 
 
Additionally, the health inspector will work with the Board of Health and the state Department of Environmental Protection on the septic issues. 
 
However, they can not do anything until the snow melts so they can get to the tanks and leach field to see what the status is, Morse said. 
 
The wiring inspector has spoken with the management company's facilities person, and they will also visit in the spring because they will not be able to access the poles and electrical boxes until some of the snow melts, she said. 
 
"I did get a petition today from the residents of Berkshire village. I just need to go over it with them again because it didn't have everything that it needed," Morse said. 
 
Morse said Berkshire Village's tenants' association meeting was to hold its first meeting.
 
The residents have been coordinating with the Massachusetts Federation of Manufactured Home Communities in establishing the association. 

Tags: mobile home park,   property taxes,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Adams Planning Board Cited for Open Meeting Law Violation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
ADAMS, Mass. — The state Attorney General's Office has determined that the Planning Board violated Open Meeting Law by continuing to deliberate on a matter after adjournment.
 
According to the determination, the violation occurred after adjourning the Jan. 27, 2025, meeting when three board members stayed to discuss permitting concerns for Aisling Mountain Farm, a 22-acre equestrian facility on West Road owned by Kathryn Foley.
 
The board was ordered to amend its meeting minutes within the next 30 days, to include a summary of the discussion that occurred after the meeting was adjourned, to certify to to the AG's Office that it has done so, and to comply with the Open Meeting Law going forward.
 
The ruling stems from a complaint filed by Catherine Foster on Aug. 22, 2025, alleging that the board violated the Open Meeting Law during and after its Jan. 27 meeting.
 
Although filed nearly seven months after the January meeting, the Attorney General's Office said it met the 30-day filing deadline because Foster did not become aware of the situation until it was raised at a July 23 Select Board meeting.
 
"The Open Meeting Law requires that complaints be filed within 30 days of the alleged violation, or if the alleged violation could not reasonably have been known at the time it occurred, then within 30 days of the date it should reasonably have been discovered," Assistant Attorney General Matthew Lindberg said in the determination.
 
"The complainant could not reasonably have discovered that the Board deliberated after adjournment of the January 27 meeting until the issue was raised during public comment at the July 23 Select Board meeting. Because the complaint was filed within 30 days of the July 23 Select Board meeting, the complaint was filed timely as to this allegation"
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories