image description
The outreach committee for the proposed public safety building brainstorm ways to get information out on the project.

Lanesborough Public Safety Committee Plans Informational Outreach

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Planners of the public safety building proposal continue to grapple with how to achieve an affirmative vote from taxpayers. 

In the next couple of weeks, they will work to create a frequently asked questions fact sheet and pitch the $7.3 million project to legislators. Earlier this year, the Select Board voted to advance a combined police/emergency medical services facility, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build.  

The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

On Tuesday, members of the Public Safety Complex Information and Outreach Committee discussed how other Berkshire towns have been able to pass public safety proposals and wondered how Lanesborough could follow suit. 

Emergency Medical Services Director Jen Weber said proposals in other towns were approved after consistent information sharing and support from the community. Her department has been asked to leave the fire station at 180 South Main St., which is owned by the Fire Association, because of insufficient space. 

"Overwhelmingly, what we get back for feedback is that there's almost an FAQ page that was passed out to the important people in the town, to the Select Board, to the town manager, to the police chief, to the ambulance director, to the fire chief, to the committee, and everyone answered the questions the same," she said. 

"It is just overall and passionately supported, and there was no kickback from those people. There was only overwhelmingly positive support, and that is what got Lenox, that public safety building with zero 'no' votes, because they passionately all said the same thing, and they were positive, and they were supporting the project." 

Committee members cited negativity over social media and beyond and stressed the importance of getting the facts out in an easy-to-understand format. They voted to remove "confusing" documents from the town website, such as a calculator that says "enter your home value to see maximum annual additional cost" and gives home values ranging from $250,000 to $500,000. 

With a $6.3 million loan or bond amount, the operating budget's annual repayment would be $370,000, and the additional annual cost would range from $156.25 to $312.50. 



Town Administrator Gina Dario said resistance to big capital projects like this is not unique to Lanesborough, "It's just that the other towns have done something to get it over the line." 

"They are pounding pavement. They're getting call lists. They're kind of rallying their neighbors and saying, 'Look, you call these 10 people. You call these 10 people. You call these 10 people,'" she said. 

"It's gritty but anecdotally that is what I understand is getting people over the line at that moment, because you're trying to outweigh that minority that tend to be very vocal, very perhaps more anti." 

At the beginning of the meeting, committee member Preston Repenning suggested that they combine the special town meeting with a fun musical event, explaining, "This is either play to win or have it go by the wayside." 

Dario pointed out that, if approved at the special town meeting, the public safety proposal would go to a subsequent ballot. The planners agreed to look into the legal and practical constraints around the idea. 

Funding is the obvious barrier for town voters. Chair Mark Seigers said if they could get another $2.5 million, "We wouldn't be doing all this." The committee agreed that conversations must be had with state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III about possible state and federal funding. 

"The process here is either we find new money, additional money, or we convince a bunch of people without the resources, to do it the way we professionally do it, that it's in their best interest to support the project," he said. 

"And my experience in Lanesborough is that it tends to be a lack of community vision. It tends to be a focus on what my tax bill is, rather than what you're getting from it." 


Tags: public safety buildings,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories