image description
The outreach committee for the proposed public safety building brainstorm ways to get information out on the project.

Lanesborough Public Safety Committee Plans Informational Outreach

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Planners of the public safety building proposal continue to grapple with how to achieve an affirmative vote from taxpayers. 

In the next couple of weeks, they will work to create a frequently asked questions fact sheet and pitch the $7.3 million project to legislators. Earlier this year, the Select Board voted to advance a combined police/emergency medical services facility, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build.  

The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

On Tuesday, members of the Public Safety Complex Information and Outreach Committee discussed how other Berkshire towns have been able to pass public safety proposals and wondered how Lanesborough could follow suit. 

Emergency Medical Services Director Jen Weber said proposals in other towns were approved after consistent information sharing and support from the community. Her department has been asked to leave the fire station at 180 South Main St., which is owned by the Fire Association, because of insufficient space. 

"Overwhelmingly, what we get back for feedback is that there's almost an FAQ page that was passed out to the important people in the town, to the Select Board, to the town manager, to the police chief, to the ambulance director, to the fire chief, to the committee, and everyone answered the questions the same," she said. 

"It is just overall and passionately supported, and there was no kickback from those people. There was only overwhelmingly positive support, and that is what got Lenox, that public safety building with zero 'no' votes, because they passionately all said the same thing, and they were positive, and they were supporting the project." 

Committee members cited negativity over social media and beyond and stressed the importance of getting the facts out in an easy-to-understand format. They voted to remove "confusing" documents from the town website, such as a calculator that says "enter your home value to see maximum annual additional cost" and gives home values ranging from $250,000 to $500,000. 

With a $6.3 million loan or bond amount, the operating budget's annual repayment would be $370,000, and the additional annual cost would range from $156.25 to $312.50. 



Town Administrator Gina Dario said resistance to big capital projects like this is not unique to Lanesborough, "It's just that the other towns have done something to get it over the line." 

"They are pounding pavement. They're getting call lists. They're kind of rallying their neighbors and saying, 'Look, you call these 10 people. You call these 10 people. You call these 10 people,'" she said. 

"It's gritty but anecdotally that is what I understand is getting people over the line at that moment, because you're trying to outweigh that minority that tend to be very vocal, very perhaps more anti." 

At the beginning of the meeting, committee member Preston Repenning suggested that they combine the special town meeting with a fun musical event, explaining, "This is either play to win or have it go by the wayside." 

Dario pointed out that, if approved at the special town meeting, the public safety proposal would go to a subsequent ballot. The planners agreed to look into the legal and practical constraints around the idea. 

Funding is the obvious barrier for town voters. Chair Mark Seigers said if they could get another $2.5 million, "We wouldn't be doing all this." The committee agreed that conversations must be had with state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III about possible state and federal funding. 

"The process here is either we find new money, additional money, or we convince a bunch of people without the resources, to do it the way we professionally do it, that it's in their best interest to support the project," he said. 

"And my experience in Lanesborough is that it tends to be a lack of community vision. It tends to be a focus on what my tax bill is, rather than what you're getting from it." 


Tags: public safety buildings,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Planners Hold Public Hearing on Tiny Homes Bylaw

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

DALTON, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing last week on a bylaw for mobile accessory dwelling units (ADU) that will be brought before a special town meeting.

For nearly two years, Amy Turnbull has been trying to amend the current ADU bylaws to allow mobile tiny homes.  

A movable tiny home is defined as a unit under 400 square feet that meets all of someone's daily needs, including sanitation, cooking, and other facilities, and which is also mobile. Most homes considered "tiny" are built on a trailer so they can be towed.

Her proposal defines a movable tiny house as a "residential property with an existing primary house, intended for year-round living," and outlines eight conditions for approval.

Among these conditions: the unit must adhere to accessory dwelling unit regulations, undergo site plan review, be licensed and registered with the state Registry of Motor Vehicles, have approved energy, water, and wastewater systems, and comply with American National Standards Institute 119.5 and National Fire Protection Association 1192 safety requirements.

Additionally, the unit must be certified for ANSI or NFPA compliance by a manufacturer or third-party inspector, including adherence to Appendix Q and the International Residential Code's structural guidelines and energy efficiency standards. The tiny house cannot move under its own power, and its undercarriage, wheels, axles, tongue, and hitch must be concealed from view. Wheels and leveling or support jacks are required to rest on a level gravel or paved surface.

Turnbull has gotten enough signatures for her petition to amend the current bylaws to add her definition of the mobile ADUs. Last Wednesday, the board held a public hearing on the petitions, which will be voted on at a special meeting.

Turnbull says she has two reasons for wanting to add this to the town's bylaws: aging in place and affordable housing.

"We need a variety of housing types in Dalton, and that we also need to address the idea that you know nearly 30 percent of our population by 2035 is going to be over 65 years old, and it's problematic because  ... there's not enough choice for these people to to age in place,"she said. "What movable tiny houses does, is it provides a less restrictive ADU. It's much cheaper to place, and it's easier to place, less time consuming. And what it offers to people is it offers people who are owners a place for their children to come and live, or a caregiver to come and live, or for the people who own their own house to come and live while they rent out their maybe their three bedroom home to a new family who wants to attend to Craneville simultaneously."

She said people need to move away from calling and treating the tiny homes as though they are trailers, as one former Planning Board member has voiced opinions on.

"That is an opinion, and I think we need to get over that, because I want to say that these are foundation homes, and that the chassis is a foundation, and it's a stick-built home on a chassis, and in very many ways it's like a modular house. I think we will not be surprised in the next 10 years if we see the market turn around and start to make smaller, tiny modular homes, but that is not the case right now, and we have a dire need for affordable housing," she said.

At a former Fire District meeting the Water Department drafted regulations for water hook-ups for these types of homes. The superintendent sent a letter to the Planning Board to be read at the meeting stating it will not be a hindrance for sewer system connection.

"The Department of Public Works does not feel that mobile ADUs will be an issue with the town sewer system. The homeowners will be responsible for any issues outside of the sewer main and connect and responsible for connecting in, so that would address any permits, fees, or anything like that would be added to that," the letter states. 

"The Water Department, as we've stated previous, and as you stated, the water department has come up with their own set of SOPs, standard operating procedures, for hooking up a an adu and a mobile adu, which will then have to meet winterization and all those, but they've laid out a plan for that, that they have, so I'd like to point that out," board Chair Robert Collins said.

One concern was raised that if someone can have a mobile ADU could they also have another tiny home on their property, including the main house. That situation is not likely, said Turnbull, as it would cost a considerable amount of money. Town Manager Eric Anderson also stated that in his former community when they adopted similar laws their first one wasn’t put in until a couple years later and then maybe one a year.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories