image description
Town officials voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting.

Lanesborough Picks Information Panel for Public Safety Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town has a public safety building proposal to present to taxpayers, and now, an informational committee will help move the process forward.

On Monday, the Select Board voted to form a public safety building informational outreach committee and re-appointed four members: Dean Clement, Daniel MacWhinnie, Mark Siegars, and Lisa Dachinger.

"The Public Safety Building Committee has done their job. Now we need, hopefully with some of those same bodies, to form a new committee of some type and move forward," Select Board member Timothy Sorrell explained.

Earlier this month, the town officials voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build.  The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

"There is the option to go to what could be a debt exclusion, which requires a two-thirds majority at either a special town meeting or an annual town meeting, and that can be followed by inclusion in a ballot," Town Administrator Gina Dario said.

Siegars advised that if the question goes to a ballot first with a fixed project budget, that amount can't be changed for a subsequent special town meeting vote.

"In our discussions, there are committee members who are willing to stay on if you wanted to continue the committee or appoint to new one, who have volunteered to be involved with any public information sessions to try to answer the questions with the idea that that they would also explore further and work with Gina and town counsel on specifically what the question should be for a special town meeting, and if, if warranted a subsequent ballot vote," he reported.

Chairman Michael Murphy echoed the former committees' arguments that the town can't explore grants and financing until it has approved an amount.


"If I remember from the previous committee, and from this committee, there was a lot of feelings that no matter what we set the amount at, I know it's intimidating amount, but that if we can get that amount approved, there was confidence from both committees that we can find sources of money that will greatly reduce the cost to the taxpayers," he said.

"But that's a message that seems to get lost for me."

Many people have reportedly told Select Board member Deborah Maynard that they want to see the numbers in "black and white," including the total cost and all possible financial assistance.

Dario pointed out that the former Police Station Committee did much of that research, and it is archived on the town website. She feels the information campaign needs to simplify that information to bring before voters, recognizing that both former panels did a great job.

"There's a lot of information there, and I think, if anything, that we know just from working with the community, we need to put it in one place, make it very accessible," she said.

Throughout this process, Siegars has found "you have to learn how to listen and talk to people."

"We may all be able to understand each other, but I know on the committee, it took a while for us all to speak the same language," he said.

"So when somebody expressed a concern or an interest, we knew what they were talking about. We knew enough to ask questions to make sure we understood what they were asking about because I think part of it's fear and part of it's the unknown."


Tags: Lanesborough Police Station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

With Tears, Pittsfield Officials Vote to Close Morningside

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee on Wednesday made an emotional vote to close Morningside Community School at the end of the academic year. 

Officials identified the school's lack of classroom walls as the most significant obstacle, creating a difficult, noisy learning environment that is reflected in its accountability score.

Interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips said the purpose of considering the closure is centered on the district's obligation to ensure every student has access to a learning environment that best supports academic growth and achievement, school climate, equitable access to resources, and long-term success. 

"While fiscal implications are included, the potential closure of the school is fundamentally driven by the student performance, their learning conditions, the building inadequacy, and equitable student access, rather than the district's budget," she said. 

"… The goal is not to save money. The goal is to reinvest that money to make change, specifically for our Morningside students, and then for the whole school building, as a whole." 

Over the last month or so, the district has considered whether to retire the open concept, community school at the end of the school year. 

Morningside, built in the 1970s, currently serves 374 students in grades prekindergarten through 5, including a student population with 88.2 percent high-needs, 80.5 percent low-income, and 24.3 percent English learners.  Its students will be reassigned to Allendale, Capeless, Egremont, and Williams elementary schools.

School Committee member and former Morningside student Sarah Muil, through tears, made the motion to approve the closure at the end of this school year. The committee took a five-minute recess after the vote. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories