image description
Loose estimation of where the three elementary zones will fall in Pittsfield after consolidation.

Plan for Merging Pittsfield's Elementary Zones Tabled

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The current elementary zones. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The School Committee is not ready to adopt an elementary school reorganization plan that moves Stearns students into the proposed Crosby/Conte building. 

On Wednesday, it tabled a long-term, three-zone elementary plan that assumes the Stearns population will be a part of a new school on West Street as early as 2029.  

The city has to determine the building's size, based on enrollments, in its quest for funding from the Massachusetts School Building Authority. Officials say the MSBA also wants to see how the consolidation of the West Side fits into larger plans for the district. 

Based on the attendance map, the Lebanon Avenue school is an outlier and would be absorbed into the new building, which drew some concern.  

"I need time to absorb this and work on it," Vice Chair Daniel Elias said. 

"We've had a lot of discussions. We've had a lot of meetings, and although these zones have been there, there never has been the immediate pressing nature of Stearns going goodbye, and so I think there needs to be an absorption period and a lot of dialogue before we get to that." 

An enrollment review is required to move forward with a feasibility study, Superintendent Latifah Phillips reported. This means that the city has to agree with the Massachusetts School Building Authority on the size of the building. 

She displayed a vision for a lower and upper elementary building with shared facilities from the 2023 school master plan, and a map that condenses eight elementary attendance zones into three: the West Side, the North Side, and the East Side.  

This is expected to run until 2046, and the images have been shared over the last couple of years during district restructuring outreach. The District Master Plan stages the Pittsfield High School renovation for 2029-2036, the Northside School project from 2033-2040, and the Eastside School project from 2039 to 2046. 

"When we make the decision for that building for the West Side, it is a decision for the next 20 to 30 years," Phillips said. 

"And so we want to make sure that we are clear on the future vision so that we can make sure that we build the school properly to meet the needs of the community." 

Chair William Cameron explained that MSBA wants to see a plan for the rest of the city if John C. Crosby Elementary and Silvio O. Conte Community School are consolidated. He emphasized that it is mapped out as a 20-year project and could be amended. 

"We need to be on record as supporting this plan, because at the moment, this plan is what the Crosby/Conte project is tied into," he said. "This is the first step of a three-step project." 



He doesn't think people who have paid attention to the project will be shocked by the visuals, citing the dozen public meetings that were held. The restructuring study was fueled by population decline. 

"I want to emphasize this doesn't mean we're merging these schools. Period. Better plan on it, start packing your books. This is a schematic, still. It is a general plan, it's my understanding, and it doesn't mean we're planning to take your keys and you won't be able to go back to your building next year," committee member Sara Hathaway said. 

"This is a very long-term plan. We don't have the money to replace all these schools, for one thing. We don't have locations to replace them. But the idea is that the state wants to know how many children are in this area, who will be attending in that area in the year 2030 or 2035." 

Mayor Peter Marchetti said that "at best," they would combine the three West Side elementary schools in 2029. Without this plan, he said, they either won't get to the feasibility study or will get into it with a much smaller school and go back to the drawing board. 

School Committee member William Garrity unsuccessfully moved to add "for the purposes of MSBA enrollment projections" to the motion while it was on the floor for approval. 

"I just don't feel comfortable committing to something right now that could not be happening," he said. 

Marchetti made the motion to table, recognizing that the MSBA needs enrollment numbers by the end of October.  

"Would it be feasible for us to table this tonight, go back to MSBA with the concerns that we've heard from some of the school committee members, and see if there's a path forward?" he asked Phillips. 

"Because, I mean, my understanding is, at this very moment, the size of the project depends on where this School Committee goes, or maybe the future of this project decides what happens as we go forward, and I think hearing some of the concerns, we may be not in the right place to be making that decision tonight, and I think we could go back to MSBA and have additional conversations with how strong is that commitment, or could we redesign lines later?" 

She cautioned that the timeline is getting "tight," and the MSBA shared that they want concrete decisions instead of aspirations in order to support a larger building. 

The School Committee meets again on September 17, "and if we don't do it at the next meeting, the project is put off for another 10 years," Cameron said. 


Tags: elementary schools,   Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Looks to Another Year of Fare Free

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The BRTA is expecting another year of fare free rides.

Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Administrator Kathleen Lambert told the advisory board recently that she expects to receive $1.3 million in state funding to remain fare free. She said RTAs may be given up to $40 million this year statewide, which is $5 million up from last year.

While the state budget is not formally approved yet, the effect will take place on July 1.

The news came at the same time the board approved the BRTA's budget of $13.6 million, which is an increase of 11 percent since last fiscal year.

Some of the increases were in the fixed route area which jumped from $9 million to $12 million. Lambert said this is due to the contractual agreement between the union where they have a five percent raise for all of the drivers and other union members, as well as a seven percent raise for paratransit fleet operators.

Lambert said much of the costs raised were fuel costs because of the ongoing war in Iran. The authority uses about 8,000 gallons of fuel a month and has planned for $5.75 per gallon.

The customer service desk, which currently staffs two employees, will be shut down, she said. The two employees were given notice months in advance and one showed interest in becoming a bus driver and will plan to interview for that. Lambert said two new drivers have started and that the new transit company Keolis, which is taking over for Transdev, will continue to hold recruiting events. The new manager is Mark Moujabber, taking over for Bobby Quintos. 

Lambert told the board she believed there are discrepancies in ridership data. Deputy Administrator Benjamin Hansen, who was in operations before his current role, said the authority has been seeing low ridership because of route cancellations, however, this past month, the numbers did not make sense as demand has stayed the same but ridership seemed exponentially low.

To get the figures, bus drivers must manually push a button on the farebox to record passengers, wheelchairs, and bikes, which might have errors. There are automatic passenger counters (APCs) installed, but they are not certified, so are only used as a rough comparison tool as they are not accurate.

Board member Stuart Lawrence asked if there has been any investigation on if this might be deliberate. Hansen said there is not as he does not know how they could watch for that to happen.

Lambert said she has been working with professor Paula Consolini at Williams College, who will have a group of samplers who will ride the bus and gather a week's worth of data.

In the last meeting, the board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, and a letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.  

Multiple employees had also signed on to a vote of no confidence letter in the BRTA administration spearheaded by Raymond Killeen who is a bus driver and represents Cheshire on the advisory board. Killeen said losing Quintos was hard, stating he was an excellent general manager and not having him there led to hardships on accomplishing many things.

"Once the removal was there, it was difficult to accomplish certain things, because we had lost the general manager. So, the letter was an attempt to get things moving a little bit quicker, so we could provide a better service for the residents of Berkshire County. I don't know if it accomplished that. We were able to do some things, though, but the concern amongst rank and file here is that we're not providing the best service we possibly could, and we're hoping that when the new management team comes in, that can be accomplished," Killeen said.

Killeen said he was unhappy with the progress to a revised driver schedule. The day after the meeting, Lambert and the team had a meeting to discuss and negotiate run schedules, Lambert said it was a very good and productive meeting.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories