Pittsfield Licensing Board Puts Heat on Chili's

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — In January, the Licensing Board will decide if it should start the six-month timer for Chili's to sell its liquor license before it is revoked. 

The restaurant closed abruptly in August 2024 and has been looking for a buyer for over a year.  Representatives have come before the board a few times with reports that there are interested parties, but no sale. 

"The reason that we keep asking you the same old questions, and now it's well over a year after the place closed, is that under state law, if a licensee is not operating, then we have to turn up the heat to see if either the license can be transferred to somebody that will operate, or theoretically, Chili's could go back in and start operating with a license," Chair Thomas Campoli said. 

The board will hear from a Chili's representative at the January meeting and discuss whether to begin the six months that the business has to reopen or sell its liquor license.  The current lease agreement goes out to 2029, and the company, Pepper Dining Inc., is looking for another business to carry it out.

Director of Northeast Operations Allen Anderson reported that there are a few active buyers in the pipeline right now, but nothing has been solidified. It is his understanding that the intent is to sell what's left of the business, including the building contents and license. 

"I talked to counsel this morning, and I think they were maybe re-evaluating what the price we're trying to get for the license and the business," he reported. 


He was told that some potential buyers had dropped off, and there has been more recent interest.  

Campoli explained that the board could vote on Chili's liquor license by the next meeting, starting the six-month timer, adding, "I mean, in particular, I don't want to do that, but that's what we could do."  In Pittsfield, when a liquor license is revoked, that is one less license for the city. 

"I got the impression, I have a belief that they may be a little bit more aggressive to seek out a buyer, because I'm sure it's more attractive with a liquor license than it is without," Anderson said. 

"… The drawback to that, the whole deal is, is the rent, right? So whoever picks up that, wants to go in there for a restaurant, it's going to have to be somebody that could afford the rent." 

Campoli said that if Pepper Dining can provide any specific information that suggests a deal is on the horizon, it would make the delay more palatable.  

Board member Kathy Amuso made the motion for an update in January. The six months can likely be extended if the panel sees fit. 


Tags: license board,   liquor license,   restaurants,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Sees Traffic Petitions

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Several traffic requests were made at the City Council's last meeting, including a query about the deteriorating Dalton Avenue overpass and an ask to fix the raised crosswalk on Holmes Road.  

On April 14, the City Council handled petitions from Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren and Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham requesting an update on the current condition of the Dalton Avenue bridge overpass and rehabilitation plan, and a petition from Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso and Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn requesting the "timely removal" or reconfiguration of the speed bump on Holmes Road between Elm Street and William Street. 

Parts of the Dalton Avenue bridge's concrete sides appear to be crumbling, exposing rusted steel supports and requiring a barrier in the eastbound lane. Warren and Cunningham's petition was referred to the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, which is leading the replacement. 

According to the MassDOT's website, the bridge replacement over the Ashuwillticook bike trail is in the preliminary design phase and will cost more than $9 million. A couple of years ago, a raised crosswalk was installed on the corridor as part of road diet improvements to slow traffic and foster safety.  

The councilors said they are understanding and supportive of the bump's intentions, but the current design and condition "present more significant safety concerns rather than effectively addressing them."  The petition was referred to the commissioner of public works. 

Wrinn said they have spoken to "many, many" constituents about it, and they feel the speed bump is pretty egregious. 

"It's causing more problems than actually helping people, and we want to explore other options with something similar to Tyler Street, a brightly colored crosswalk, more signage," he explained. 

Amuso's goal is to do some kind of reconfiguration, because as she has been told, it is up to code, but "when you're going up that street, and your car is coming off the road, that's not safe either."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories