Hunger in the Berkshires Does Not Take a Holiday

By Deborah LeonczykGuest Column
Print Story | Email Story
When the holidays end and life settles back into its familiar routines, the surge of generosity that defines November and December inevitably begins to fade. The food drives quiet down, the festive meals are over, and the community's attention shifts to the next challenge. 
 
Yet for thousands of our Berkshire neighbors, hunger remains exactly where it was before the holidays began. It does not ease with the passing of a season. It does not follow the calendar. It lingers quietly at kitchen tables long after the decorations have been packed away.
 
Hunger in the Berkshires affects working parents stretching every paycheck, older adults deciding between groceries and prescriptions, and children who depend on school meals through the long winter months. For many families, hunger is not a temporary crisis but a constant strain that often intensifies once the holidays are behind us.
 
The Numbers Behind the Need
According to the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts, an average of 25,324 Berkshire residents sought food assistance each month last year through one of the county's 39 local food pantries or meal sites. A statewide study by the Greater Boston Food Bank found that 39 percent of Berkshire residents are food insecure compared with 33 percent statewide. These numbers do not shrink after the holidays. In fact, winter expenses often push many families from "barely managing" into "needing help now."
 
Behind each number is a person doing everything possible to get by. A parent skipping dinner so a child can eat. A senior making a single bag of groceries last the week. Hard-working families who simply earn too little to keep pace with the rising cost of living in our region.
 
A Network of Hope
Fortunately, Berkshire County is home to an extraordinary network of food providers that operates with unwavering compassion throughout the year. Across the county, 21 food pantries, six meal sites, eight senior "brown bag" locations, and four Mobile Food Bank sites extend care and dignity to thousands of residents.
 
The Pittsfield Community Food Pantry serves more than 6,700 people each month through open pantry hours, grab-and-go breakfasts, prepared dinners, and home deliveries to 500 families weekly. In North Adams, the Berkshire Food Project serves hot meals five days a week to nearly 2,300 people, and the Friendship Center Food Pantry welcomes close to 1,000 residents every month. The Lee Food Pantry and the Berkshire Dream Center's mobile pantry ensure that families in smaller or more rural towns are not left behind.
 
At BCAC, our Food Depot coordinates weekly deliveries from the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts to pantries countywide. With transportation donated by Big Y, food reaches every corner of the county. Goodwill of the Berkshires and Southern Vermont also sends trucks of fresh groceries to some of the most remote areas. Together, these programs provide more than 2.6 million meals each year, yet the need continues to grow during the winter months when budgets are stretched the furthest.
 
The Economics of Hunger
The roots of hunger here lie in both economics and geography. The median household income in Berkshire County is about $72,500, compared with more than $104,000 statewide.
 
While housing costs may be higher in eastern Massachusetts, the income gap leaves Berkshire families with far less margin to absorb rising prices for groceries, heat, and transportation. The county's poverty rate of 12 percent is higher than the state average of 10 percent, and nearly one in six Berkshire children lives in a household struggling to get by.
 
But poverty and food insecurity are not the same. While about 12 percent of residents live below the poverty line, tens of thousands more hover just above it. They earn too much to qualify for assistance, yet too little to stay food secure. These are the families most vulnerable once holiday generosity subsides.
 
The SNAP Connection
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program remains the most effective safeguard against hunger. Yet when temporary federal increases expired in 2023, households across Massachusetts lost about $151 a month on average.
 
For many Berkshire families, that reduction pushed them toward local food pantries for the first time. And after Congress passed a reconciliation budget expected to remove 150,000 Massachusetts residents from SNAP, the strain on local food programs is expected to intensify in the year ahead.
 
Carrying Compassion Forward
The holidays inspire generosity, but the real test of a community's compassion comes in the quieter months that follow. Hunger is with us all year long. The question is whether our commitment will last just as long.
 
Here is how you can help in the months ahead:
  • Advocate for strong federal investments in SNAP and oppose reductions to benefits.
  • Volunteer during the winter months when volunteer numbers drop sharply.
  • Donate food, funds, or grocery cards on a monthly basis to help pantries remain stocked after holiday giving declines.
The Berkshires has always been a place where people look out for one another. That spirit is our strength. As we move into a new year, let us carry forward the compassion we show during the holidays and work toward a future where no one in the Berkshires goes hungry.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

Tags: BCAC,   food insecurity,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to the Future of Zoning Bylaws

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board is reviewing the town's zoning bylaws with an eye to amending zones to align with planning documents and projects. 

Members started at last week's meeting to at priority zoning projects that align with the Open Space and Recreation Plan and the Master Plan that was adopted last year. Earlier in the meeting, the board accepted the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's draft of the OSRP, which the Select Board accepted late last month.

Town planner Andrew Groff informed the board of upcoming projects that will need to be looked at for zoning purposes to try and stay ahead of the bylaws that aligned in both the OSRP and Master Plan.

"Principally, would be going back and thinking about this idea of a mixed-use zoning district for the northern part of town that's responsive to the growth of outdoor recreation as it is really an industry. So you've got Shaker Ridge, you've got the folks at Donnybrook that proposes a glamping resort, Ramble Wild, and Brodie Mountain just over the town line in New Ashford with some new ownership and expanded interest in some development there, so that's one item that's called for in both."

Groff also explained they need to look into agriculture zones to help local farmers 

"Seeing if we can't do something to better support our farms because we have a couple great little farm clusters in Lanesborough. You know, zoning for agriculture is pretty expansive in Massachusetts. The exemption for agriculture is pretty wise, but we want to take a closer look and talk to some of our farmers and figure out there's some tweaks we can do that would make their lives easier."

He also brought up how they can help fix the zoning bylaws around the lake that are nonconforming and want to look into grant funding to help.

"Work that's going to be done to further protect Pontoosuc Lake, and we have a lot in our master plan regarding the zoning issues on Pontoosuc from the issue that you had mentioned to me, bringing back the citizens who were concerned about building heights down there, but you know, more fundamentally identified in the master plan is the problems with how everything is basically nonconforming. The zoning doesn't conform to what the actual built environment is. That's something we probably want to look into talking with folks in the community planning office," he said.

Groff mentioned there is a ballot question that, if it passes, would mean changing zoning regarding public water and sewer, and affect properties near the lake. 

"There is going to be on the ballot in November a question that will essentially require any community in Massachusetts that has built an environment that's on public water/sewer, you're going to have to reduce your lot sizes to 5,000 square feet. So I feel like if that passes, that has massive implications for that part of town. So, just another one to put out there, but maybe we want to wait to really tackle that with some grant funding once we know what the Legislature's done."

Chair Leanne Yinger said she lives in that area and it already seems very congested, meaning that the passage of the ballot question could have big implications.

She also mentioned another implication for the health of the lake she would like to see happen.

"I would like to see us ban pesticides and people treating their lawns," she said. "Part of the problem of the health of the lake is that when I say that out loud, and I'm saying it out loud to anybody who will listen to me, it is not a popular thing to say. But it is killing the lake."

Yinger said she would like to clarify who governs the sewer system around Pontoosuc Lake, noting the new owner of a friend's house needed to purchase access to the sewer from a private party. Groff said he couldn't remember if it is water district or town, but that there is something "funky" about the governance over there.

"I need to understand what that looks like, because the way it came down was interesting. The line comes in from Pittsfield, but there are people claiming that they have rights to it because they bought into it originally. I just want to understand what that's like and who's saying you're in charge with it, because it seems to me that that's a town-managed situation," Yinger said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories