Pittsfield Resident Given OK to Distribute Doughnuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council has clarified that a charitable resident can continue distributing cider and doughnuts to people, as long as parking regulations are followed.

"So it is my understanding now, throughout this meeting, that there is no longer any threat of fine for feeding the homeless," Ward 7 Councilor Moody said to Robert Ball, who has distributed sweets and hot beverages around the city for months.

A couple of weeks ago, Ball told News10 that he ran into issues with the city about his charitable food distributions. Moody saw the story and filed a request that the city stand down on penalties against good Samaritans feeding unhoused community members until code violations can be clarified and the city solicitor can weigh in on the possibility of violating people's First Amendment rights.

During public comment, he reported receiving fines, tickets, citations, and increased pressure that made the distribution difficult.

"For many months, I've been volunteering my own time and money to provide hot apple cider and donuts to people experiencing homelessness here in Pittsfield. I'm not part of an organization. I don't receive grants. I've never asked the city for a single dollar. I'm one person trying to help out people who are cold and hungry and often invisible," Ball said.

"Sometimes all I'm offering is something warm and a moment of dignity, and that makes a difference."

Moody's petition was filed after city officials disputed claims of fines or threats of enforcement. Ball believes that the rest of Pittsfield should show more compassion and that there would be more community outreach if it were easier to assist people.

"When volunteers are treated as partners instead of problems, the entire community benefits. Public health improves, tensions decrease, and people in crisis are met with dignity instead of displacement," he said.

Mayor Peter Marchetti said his first experience with Ball was when he sought relief from a parking ticket for facing the wrong way on Pearl Street near the ServiceNet shelter, and that the fine has nothing to do with the food being served.

"Mr. Ball can do all the food distribution that he would like. I would like him to do it in a sanitary manner," he said.


Director of Public Health Andy Cambi said there have been no fines or formal requests issued for Ball to stop. Ball approached the mayor's office seeking a parking pass to distribute food, Cambi reported, and the Health Department became involved because of the nature of the request.

"At that point, I assessed the situation, and I saw that the food was being distributed out of a trunk, and regardless, I said the Health Department cannot sanction you to do this activity," the health director said, citing legal concerns if the city sponsored the handout.

Cambi was most concerned about the food being distributed from a trunk, a typically contaminated space, and said he provided Ball with guidelines for safe food distribution and alternative modes of distribution. He said the same dignity, respect, and standards should be applied when serving people experiencing homelessness.

At the very least, and if legal, Marchetti would like a policy that requires food distributers to sign a waiver of the City of Pittsfield.

Some community members voiced support for Ball's charitable distribution during public comment. Resident Christopher Bones argued that the store-bought apple cider and doughnuts, staple New England treats, are no different than the food in corporate break rooms or company pizza parties.

"What hurts the vulnerable people of Pittsfield more, the chance that someone else's hand may brush their food or no food at all?" he asked.

Resident Shannon Stephens said there is already hostile architecture in Pittsfield's downtown, and "everyone wants us to believe it isn't a war on the poor."

"What I do and who I share my food with that I buy is completely my business. The government, local or not, has no right to tell me what to do with my money or my goods," she added.

"You can tell me until you're blue in the face to instead donate to a shelter or food pantry, but there are still going to be people who fall through those cracks."

Tags: good samaritan,   homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Proposes 2.64 Tax Rate Hike

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The proposed tax rate for fiscal year 2027 is less than 40 cents per $1,000 valuation for residential properties and would increase the average property tax bill by about $146 per year. 

On Tuesday's City Council meeting agenda is a request from the mayor and Board of Assessors to use a residential factor of .8245 at a shift of 1.75, resulting in a residential tax rate of $17.88 and a commercial, industrial, and personal property tax rate of $37.95.

These matters are typically referred to the Committee of the Whole for deliberation. The proposed rates for residential and commercial are 38 cents and $1.05 more, respectively, from FY26. 

The average residential home, valued at $316,792 in FY27, has increased by about $1,500 from the previous fiscal year, and would pay $5,664.24 in yearly taxes.

This is a 2.64 percent, or $145.88, increase. 

The average commercial property worth $239,600 saw a $100 increase in value from the previous fiscal year, and would pay $9,092.82 in yearly taxes. This is a $255.27, or 2.89 percent, increase from the previous fiscal year. 

The FY27 tax levy of $124,468,317 is a $5.3 million increase from the previous year, or 4.45 percent. There is about  $388,000 in excess levy capacity, $2.3 million in new growth, and the levy limit is $124,856,412. 

According to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 11 single-family homes were added to Pittsfield's housing stock this fiscal year, increasing the city's total assessed value by $19,987,600 to $3,592,737,600. 

The city lost five two-family homes in 2027, and that housing type decreased by $3.2 million in assessed value, now worth $384,620,400. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories