Pittsfield Council Looks At Civil Service Report

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

The City Council opted to have their subcommittee review the recommendations proposed by the Civil Service Task Force.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council will further review recommendations that the city replace Civil Service with an alternate system for its police and fire chiefs.

The council voted on Tuesday to have its Committee on Public Health and Safety take up an examination of a series of recommendations put forth this by a task force put together by the mayor.

The task force has been looking at the issues surrounding the role civil service in the appointment of public safety department heads over several months. 

"We did a lot of hard work, and we looked at a lot of issues," said Michael McCarthy, who served on the nine member committee. 

McCarthy said that the committee had ultimately been somewhat divided on the question of whether to remove the position of these chiefs from the civil service system, but had been unanimous on several key principles about their appointment, an issue which has proved controversial for the city for years.

While the task force voted 6-3 in favor of opting out of civil service, with representatives from the fire and police unions opposed, the committee was unanimous in stating that whatever method is used should be objective, transparent, and based in merit.

"Whether we come out of civil service or not, we want those principles to be included," McCarthy told the council.

 

Related Stories

The city has been without a duly appointed police or fire chief for a number of years, with the current heads of those departments serving as chiefs in an "acting" capacity, a source of concern for many in local government.

The issue sparked considerable debate among the committee who forged the city's new charter, who ultimately found it too big a question to be settled under their auspices, asking the mayor to assemble a special group to study the problem more thoroughly.

"The civil service system is well-intended, but it's broken," said Councilor Christopher Connell, who thanked the committee for providing some direction on how to proceed.

The council decided it was not yet ready to make a decision on the committee's recommendations, which were generated in May and forwarded to the council by Mayor Bianchi this week.

"The conclusion was that unfortunately civil service is a system that appears to be dying on the vine," said Bianchi, echoing contentions heard by experts throughout the committee's tenure, that the Depression-era bureaucracy was crumbling and in disarray.

Bianchi said the governor and legislature have allowed it to go under funded "because they know there's other options."

In the sole public commentary heard on the issue at Tuesday's council meeting, former School Committee member Terry Kinnas adamantly opposed removing the hiring of chiefs from the longtime evaluation system.

"The further we keep it away from political influence, the better off we are," said Kinnas.

Assistant City Solicitor Darren Lee said the recommended course of action is to hire a consultant to help draft a new ordinance that will set out the terms governing the selection of the heads of these departments.

The council voted unanimously to refer the matter to its Public Health and Safety Committee in order to hear more information and testimony on the proposed changes.

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories