image description
The Board of Health denied the appeals from both Raymond Supranowicz and Saurin Shah for different code violations.

Pittsfield Health Officials Uphold Demolition Order; Tobacco License Suspension

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
 
 
The Board of Health upheld its order to demolish on a property owned by Raymond Supranowicz on John Street. The property has been in code enforcement for years.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health upheld both a demolition order on a multi-unit building on John Street and a suspension of Thing or Two's tobacco license.
 
Thing or Two Variety on Francis Avenue will have its tobacco licenses suspended for seven days following a number of violations.
 
Health Director Gina Armstrong said on May 10, inspectors from the Tri-Town Health Department found flavored tobacco products in stock. Such products were banned dating back to sweeping new tobacco regulations crafted in 2014. 
 
Armstrong said that fine still hasn't been paid. On Aug. 2, Tri-Town Health performed a second inspection to ensure compliance and found three more violations -- state and city licenses were not properly displayed, signage required by the state Department of Public Health was not displayed, and the clerk sold products to two customers without verifying age.
 
That is the second violation within a 24-month period, which calls for an additional $350 fine and a seven-day suspension. Armstrong said that in total, owner Saurin Shah owes $700 in fines and he had called to establish a payment plan and then missed the first payment. 
 
Shah recognized he "messed up" when it came to hanging the license. He said all of his licenses had been paid in full but just never got around to printing them out from the online permitting program.
 
"I just forgot to print them and put them on the wall," Shah said.
 
He contested the allegation that he was selling flavored products and said the inspector found an unopened package of flavored cigars under the register that he was sending back to the vendor, adding that he doesn't sell in any of the three stores he manages. To the sales of tobacco allegation, he said he terminated the employee who sold tobacco without asking the customers for identification.
 
Armstrong, however, said it had been nearly a month since the citation for not displaying the licenses and the Department of Public Health required signage and when inspectors were there on Tuesday, they still weren't displayed. Shah said he did it last night after the inspectors had left. 
 
"There is an apparent disregard for the requirements of the Board of Health to maintain a tobacco sales permit," Armstrong said.
 
Shah recognized where he had gone wrong on some of the violations and said he'd correct it. He said he'd pay the fines but he asked that the board overturn the suspension. He cited his record of managing multiple stores in the city for years without much for violations - though Armstrong contended there had been violations at other stores in the past. 
 
"I messed up and I hope not to have a suspension for it," Shah said.
 
Shah added that during a suspension not only will he lose money but, being a neighborhood store, his customers' needs would be affected.
 
Board of Health member Alan Kulberg responded that his customer's convenience isn't the board's concern -- public health is. And Kulberg hasn't seen a strong effort to comply with the city's tobacco requirements aimed to ensure public health.
 
"You have not shown good faith. There is a repeated pattern of disregard for the code," Kulberg said.
 
In other business, the board upheld its order to tear down a blighted property on John Street.
 
In June, the board issued an order that the building at 49-55 John St. be razed. The owner would either have to pay for it or the city would and bill the owner and place a lien on the property. Owner Raymond Supranowicz asked for another six months to find a buyer.
 
"I stopped working on it because it was broken into and they stole all of the copper," Supranowicz said, adding that he is hoping for somebody to purchase it and rehab it.
 
He said the roof is nine years old and that there have been some leads on potential purchasers. Code Enforcement Inspector Mark Blaisdell, however, said the property has been in code enforcement since 2016 and has been in disrepair for years before that.
 
He said the property doesn't have proper lighting at night or security to keep people out of it, there is a lack of utilities, and fire alarms are not connected to alert the Fire Department. It has sat vacant for a number of years and has substantial structural issues.
 
Armstrong added that she had spoken with Supranowicz when he contacted the city asking for an appeal and stressed the importance of at least maintaining the exterior. She said as of Tuesday, even the lawn hadn't been mowed. 
 
"During this period of time there has been no maintenance on the property," Blaisdell said. "This house has been dilapidated and a blight to the neighborhood."
 
Supranowicz contested that he had hired somebody to take care of the exterior but it either hadn't been done well enough or at all.
 
"I hired a kid to do this stuff and I get a bill and it is not done," he said of the exterior maintenance.
 
Supranowicz had also missed two prior appeal hearings the Board of Health scheduled since the June 6 order. Supranowicz said he was out of town dealing with family issues much of the year and was unable to make it to those two hearings.
 
"Nobody is looking at this property saying 'I want this property,'" Blaisdell said, pointing out that the leads for a sale Supranowicz presented were places the city referred him to.
 
The Board of Health felt Blaisdell had long documentation of the issue and made a clear case as to why the building should be torn down and upheld its previous decision. Supranowicz now has the option of appealing the order in court.
 
"This board is about ensuring public health," Chairman Stephen Smith said.
 
The demolition of the property is not only an effort to combat blight but a symbolic one at that. It is the same property Mayor Linda Tyer had stood in front of when she was just a candidate and promised to be more aggressive in tackling blighted conditions in the city. In 2017 it was finally condemned and now it is on pace to be razed.

Tags: blight,   BOH,   demolition,   tobacco regulations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories