Home About Archives RSS Feed

The Independent Investor: New Fiduciary Rule Would Benefit All of Us

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist

The Department of Labor is trying again. This week, a proposed new rule, backed by the president, would force all financial advisers to adopt a "fiduciary responsibility" toward their clients when overseeing retirement plans. If passed, it could substantially reduce the fees and expenses we pay for that advice.

So exactly what is this fiduciary responsibility that President Obama is championing? The rule would require all advisers to put their client's interests above all other considerations when making investment recommendations on accounts covered under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. That means the bulk of middle class savings represented by all types of IRAs, 401 (k)s, 403 (B)s, pensions, et al. would finally be protected from the present practices of gouging Americans through investing them in high-priced, low-return investment vehicles.

"But I thought that was already the law," said a New York client, on hearing the news.

Actually it is not. Unless you work with a registered investment adviser, most financial advisers on Wall Street are simply required to suggest products that are "suitable" to investors. In practical terms, all that means is that a broker can't put your uninformed, 92-year-old granny into a foreign penny stock that fluctuates 10 percent or so on a daily basis. Anything else is fair game and the industry has taken advantage of that suitability rule to rake in billions over the years from you and me.

It is estimated that over the course of 25 years of saving for retirement, the average investor will pay one-third of his or her assets in fees and expenses. The White House Council of Economic Advisors estimates that these conflicts of interest cost the investor 1 percent, or about $17 billion, per year.

These legal (but less than moral) practices of the financial community have been a pet peeve of mine for years. In my columns, I have repeatedly written about these pitfalls and how my readers could avoid them. Back in 2010, when the Department of Labor suggested this rule, Wall Street, the GOP and the SEC successfully shot down the proposal arguing that a tougher fiduciary standard would prove so costly that small investors would not be able to afford investment advice at all.  I say, why pay for investment advice that only enriches the broker that gives it to you in the first place?

I'm not saying that everyone in the financial sector who is not a fiduciary is a bad guy, because they are not. It is the system that is at fault. The early '80s saw the end of an era of fixed commissions for Wall Street brokers. Since then the way brokers managed to earn a living was to acquire as many clients as possible, while making as much money as one legally could through fees, commissions and revenue-sharing kickbacks from other vendors like mutual funds, insurance companies and annuities.

The fiduciary rule would change that model substantially and it would be expensive to implement and oversee. One's compliance department, like my own, would need to oversee that rule and ensure that client's interests were always placed above the company and individual's interests.  It is certainly doable. My company has a fiduciary responsibility to our clients and enjoys a good bottom line while fulfilling the letter and the spirit of that rule.

Wall Street, in my opinion, could fulfill a fiduciary obligation and still make money — just not as much. The quality of personnel that interface with clients would have to improve and many lucrative relationships with their existing vendors would have to change as brokers pursued the best investments possible at the lowest costs. I, for one, believe this rule is long, long overdue. It's about time the government and the White House put their money where their mouth is when it comes to the little guy.

Bill Schmick is registered as an investment adviser representative with Berkshire Money Management. Bill’s forecasts and opinions are purely his own. None of the information presented here should be construed as an endorsement of BMM or a solicitation to become a client of BMM. Direct inquires to Bill at 1-888-232-6072 (toll free) or email him at Bill@afewdollarsmore.com.

     

Support Local News

We show up at hurricanes, budget meetings, high school games, accidents, fires and community events. We show up at celebrations and tragedies and everything in between. We show up so our readers can learn about pivotal events that affect their communities and their lives.

How important is local news to you? You can support independent, unbiased journalism and help iBerkshires grow for as a little as the cost of a cup of coffee a week.

News Headlines
Berkshire Health Systems Dedicates Fairview Hospital Laboratory to Gene Dellea
West Nile Found in Pittsfield Mosquitoes
Pittsfield Honors Disability Pride Month
Northern Berkshire 12U All-Stars Drop Opener at Cal Ripken Tourney
Pittsfield 10s Respond to Coach’s Challenge, Win Title
Pittsfield 12-Year-Olds Complete Tournament Round-Robin Unbeaten
Car Crashes Into Main Street Home in Lenox
Pittsfield Animal Control Commission Eyes Animal Abuse Registry
Friends of Pontoosuc Advise Spring Pause for Fishing
Natural Bridge Plans Focus on Accessibility, Safety and Viewing
 
 


Categories:
@theMarket (587)
Independent Investor (452)
Retired Investor (301)
Archives:
July 2026 (4)
July 2025 (6)
June 2026 (8)
May 2026 (9)
April 2026 (9)
March 2026 (7)
February 2026 (8)
January 2026 (8)
December 2025 (8)
November 2025 (8)
October 2025 (10)
September 2025 (6)
August 2025 (8)
Tags:
Election Japan Crisis Wall Street Rally Markets Currency Banks Selloff Interest Rates Energy Metals Fiscal Cliff Federal Reserve Housing Pullback Euro Taxes Retirement Bailout Commodities Stocks Debt Deficit Congress Stimulus Mortgages Oil Greece Recession Economy Stock Market Europe Debt Ceiling Jobs
Popular Entries:
The Retired Investor: The Hawks Return
The Retired Investor: Has Labor Found Its Mojo?
The Retired Investor: Climate Change Is Costing Billions
The Retired Investor: Time to Hire an Investment Adviser?
The Retired Investor: Crypto Crashes (Again)
The Retired Investor: My Dog's Medical Bills Are Higher Than Mine
The Retired Investor: Food, Famine, and Global Unrest
The Retired Investor: Holiday Spending Expected to Stay Strong
The Retired Investor: U.S. Shale Producers Can't Rescue Us
The Retired Investor: Investors Should Take a Deep Breath
Recent Entries:
@theMarket: Conflict, Higher Yields, Flailing Momentum in Tech Heighten Market Risk
The Retired Investor: Lessons Learned From Brexit
@theMarket: Stocks Have Best Quarter in Six Years
The Retired Investor: Sovereign Wealth Fund Could Help Solve America's Financial Issues
@theMarket: Rotation Takes Center Stage as Markets Consolidate
The Retired Investor: U.S. Sovereign Wealth Fund a Good Idea?
@theMarket: Oil's Decline Boosts Stocks
The Retired Investor: Higher Immigration Means Fewer Jobs For Americans, Or Does It?
@theMarket: Summer of Slower Growth & Lower Inflation Could Be Waiting in Wings
The Retired Investor: Does Declining Immigration Mean Growing Employment?