@the Market: House of Cards

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
In the same week, two of the nation's largest banks narrowly avoided a meltdown of colossal proportions. 

As the smoke cleared on Friday, both escaped the worst, however, Bank of America cut its dividend to a penny and both it and Citibank reported dismal fourth-quarter earnings while continuing to write off megabillions of bad loans. Bottom line: I have been negative on the financial sector for over a year and I expect more bad news in the future.

In the meantime, Citibank is being "reorganized," which is financial speak for selling off what they can to whoever will buy it. This way, the Treasury can argue that Citi is still in the banking business (even if it is a mere shadow of its former self). This, the government hopes, will maintain the fiction that the billions we have already invested to keep it afloat have not been spent in vain.

Wait, it gets worse.

Bank of America just received another $20 billion bailout on top of the $25 billion it received in the first TARP giveaway. They claimed they needed the money in order to prop up Merrill Lynch. The government is also going to guarantee $120 billion worth of the bank's assets. Investors may recall that the bank bought the nation's largest broker back in September for $50 billion in a rescue operation. Since then, Merrill has continued to hemorrhage, piling up losses at an alarming rate.

Finally, last month, Bank of America was forced to return to Washington for an emergency capital injection. Unfortunately by then all of the $350 billion TARP money that Congress approved had already been spent. But never fear, both President Bush and President-elect Obama tag-teamed the Senate into agreeing to release the second half of the $700 billion financial rescue fund. So the only question remaining is how fast the rest of our billions will disappear down this rabbit hall that we call our banking system?

The problem we face is that our financial institutions are like a house of cards that is so fragile  even the slightest pressure could collapse the entire structure. If one bank topples it could take one, two, three or more down with it because all their loans are interconnected. The pros call it counter-party risk: I loan to you, you loan to her, she loans to him and back to me. This week, investors confronted that risk yet again. 

Readers may recall that I had been looking for an extension of the rally that started in November last year. I had hoped the markets would continue to move higher into Inauguration Day and possibly beyond. This week's problems with the banks precipitated a sharp decline and threw a monkey wrench into my expectations. I take some consolation in my warning to investors that this rally was nothing more than a Bear Trap.
 
But the markets are volatile and anything could happen. I wouldn't be surprised to see the market move higher again, possibly next week, but don't be fooled. I still believe we have not seen the lows.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist as well as a registered financial planner with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, which manages more than $500 million for middle-class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquires to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146, (toll-free) or e-mail him at wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

MSBA: No Stearns in Proposed West Pittsfield School

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Stearns may not be part of the proposed consolidated West Side elementary school after all. 

During the School Building Needs Commission meeting on Monday, the owner's project managers, Skanska, reported that the Massachusetts School Building Authority would not fund a three-school project. 

Stearns Elementary School had been included in the feasibility study to see if Crosby Elementary, Conte Community School, and Stearns Elementary could all be located at 517 West St. All three school locations listed in the feasibility study had to be considered; Conte has several site challenges.

Project designers TSKP reviewed 12 different school options, and it was relayed that only the rebuilds of Crosby and Conte could be fully funded. Pittsfield would have to pay for Stearns. 

"I also think it's important to look at long-term and affordability, and if we choose to keep Stearns in, we're going to make the decision to keep PHS out," Mayor Peter Marchetti said. 

"The city cannot afford it all." 

He added that he would vote "no" on Pittsfield High School if the city is doubling down on Stearns. The city is also pursuing a statement of interest to the MSBA to fund repairs to the high school, which is almost a century old. 

"I'm not going to go to the taxpayers and say, 'give me two debt exclusions so we can build new schools,'" the mayor said. 

View Full Story

More Stories