Independent Investor: Myths of the Market

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
Whether you are a tinker, tailor, soldier or candlestick maker, each profession has its own myths and legends.  Wall Street is no different. Underneath our pinstripes and silk ties, the financial community is a superstitious lot who have divined the market's direction by using indicators as diverse as the time of the year, sports events or the length of women's skirts.

This year, I admit to paying rapt attention to one of the more popular seasonal indicators: January's "first five days." 

The legend states that whatever direction the market takes in the year's first week so goes the market. Evidence indicates that this is not a very reliable indicator and yet I fell for it and have been bearish ever since.  Statistically, it works best when the market is up on the first five days of any year.

"Sell in May and Go Away," is one often quoted saying that implies stock market returns are higher in the November-April period than in the May-October months. After 27 years experience in global markets, I tend to agree. My belief is backed up by multiple studies that indicate that in 36 out of 37 developed and emerging markets this indicator works the majority of the time.

skirtAlthough no one can provide one single cause for this, I believe it has something to do with summer vacations, especially in Europe where the effect has been noticeable since 1694.

Investors are also wary of the "October Effect" since throughout history the month has not been kind to capitalists - starting as far back as 1917, when the Russian Bolsheviks ushered in the era of Communism. October also witnessed the onset in 1929 of the Great Depression, when U.S. markets lost 30 percent of their value in three days.

In October 1987, I lived through the Black Monday Crash, experienced the Asian Currency Crisis of October 1997 from abroad and a year later (again in that dubious month) I was back in Manhattan for the Russian Loan Crisis which erupted at the same time as the near-collapse of the Connecticut hedge fund, Long Term Capital. Since then there have been several more mishaps including last year's 10 percent correction.

In the sports area, there is the Super Bowl Indicator, which has correctly indicated the direction of the stock market 76 percent of the time. A win by an old National Football League team means an up market for the year while a win by an AFL team indicates a losing year for the markets. 
 
This year, the 17-14 upset victory by the New York Giants (NFL) over the New England Patriots (AFL) should indicate an up year. In addition to football, we also have horse racing and baseball indicators. A Triple Crown winner in racing will be bad news for the averages, and expect down markets whenever the New York Mets are in the World Series.

superbowlThe presidential election cycle theory holds that the first two years after an election are down or at least unstable while the last two are up years for the market. This theory hasn't held water in recent years.

During George H.W. Bush's first year in office the market gained 25 percent while in both terms of Bill Clinton's presidency stocks were up 19.9 percent and 35.9 percent in his first years.

Other more chauvinistic indicators include: rising hemline fashions (indicating more confidence and excitement in the economy) equal up markets while an increase in lipstick purchases mean the opposite. Women, according to legend, tend to penny pinch in tough times and buy cheaper personal items like lipstick. If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you.

Like myths everywhere, Wall Street's indicators are more amusing than factual but when the markets are volatile and the future is unknown, what's the harm in a little card reading?

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, managing more than $800 million for middle-class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146, (toll free) or e-mail him at wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Announces New Supplier for Energy Program

DALTON, Mass. – The Town of Dalton has signed a thirty-four month contract with a new supplier, First Point Power.
 
Beginning with the January 2026 meter reads, the Dalton Community Choice Power Supply Program will have a new rate of $0.13042 per kWh. The Program will also continue to offer an optional 100 percent green product, which is derived from National Wind Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs), at a rate of $0.13142 per kWh.
 
For Dalton residents and businesses who are enrolled in the Town's Program, the current rate of $0.13849 per kWh will expire with the January 2026 meter reads and the new rate of $0.13042 per kWh will take effect. This represents a decrease of $5 per month on the supply side of the bill given average usage of 600 kWh. Additionally, this new rate is 3 percent lower than Eversource's Residential Basic Service rate of $0.13493 per kWh. Residents can expect to see an
average savings of $3 per month for the month of January 2026. Eversource's Basic Service rates
will change on Feb. 1, 2026.
 
Dalton launched its electricity program in January 2015 in an effort to develop an energy program that would be stable and affordable. From inception through June 2025, the Program has saved residents and small businesses over $1.7 million in electricity costs as compared to Eversource Basic Service.
 
It is important to note that no action is required by current participants. This change will be seen on the February 2026 bills. All accounts currently enrolled in the Program will remain with their current product offering and see the new rate and First Point Power printed under the "Supplier Services" section of their monthly bill.
 
The Dalton Community Choice Power Supply Program has no fees or charges. However, anyone switching from a contract with a third-party supplier may be subject to penalties or early termination fees charged by that supplier. Ratepayers should verify terms before switching.
 
View Full Story

More Stories