image description
Property at 660 Main St. is being considered by the Affordable Housing Committee for development.
image description
A vacant building lot at the corner of Cole Avenue and Maple Street, one of two the trust is looking at.
image description
A vacant building lot on Summer Street is also being proposed. The trust may select one of the three choices.

Williamstown Housing Trust Reviews Proposals for Land Purchase

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Affordable Housing Trust on Wednesday agreed to continue considering three of five proposals it received for properties the trust can purchase for the purpose of building or renovating owner-occupied, deed-restricted homes.
 
The trustees issued a request for proposals earlier this year for landowners looking to sell to the town. The trust's goal is to create one or more owner-occupied dwellings that would be perpetually affordable for residents at a given income level.
 
Five landowners submitted proposals, although one was not considered because it did not include an offering price as required under the terms of the recent request for proposals.
 
Four of the trust's five board members attended the Wednesday meeting, at which they scored the remaining four proposals and took input from Paul Austin of Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity, with whom the trustees are interested in partnering on a new build or renovation.
 
One of the four properties proposed was deemed too complicated and too expensive by the trustees. The owner of a 16-apartment and commercial space at the corner of Cole Avenue and Arnold Street offered the site for $3.2 million, which would be paid out in stages.
 
The trustees balked at the idea of depleting that much of their reserves and were hesitant to pursue a property the town would have to convert to condominiums in order to satisfy the trust's stated demand to create owner-occupied homes.
 
On the other hand, the trustees agreed that each of the remaining three properties are worth further exploration.
 
The list includes an existing home at 660 Main St. (offered at $95,000) and two vacant lots: one at the the corner of Cole and Maple Streets ($104,900) and the other on Summer Street, just off North Hoosac Road ($99,000).
 
"I'm really pleased with the response we got to the RFP," Trustee Stanley Parese said. "If any of those three had been the only one we received, I suspect we'd have found our way to do it.
 
"I don't have a strong impulse to eliminate any of the three."
 
Not that the trustees are interested in pursuing more than one. Pending a $75,000 transfer of Community Preservation Act funds coming to the Affordable Housing Trust in May, the trust's coffers will contain about $289,000 at the start of fiscal 2016.
 
The trustees do not want to spend all of that on land acquisition. They hope to hold back significant reserves to support a mortgage assistance program the trust developed in 2014 that allots up to $15,000 to qualified first-time homebuyers making up to 100 percent of the area median income.
 
By and large, the trustees and Austin agreed that either of the vacant lots under consideration would be suitable for construction of a residence. Both are already on town water, and each is large enough to accommodate at least a single family home.
 
The trustees were more cautious in their assessment of the existing four-bedroom, 1,374 square foot home on Main Street, and they agreed that they would like to arrange a site visit with the real estate agent listing the property before they decide which of the three sites to pursue.
 
Whichever way they go, the trustees likely will not see anything built in the near future — not by Habitat for Humanity, anyway.
 
Austin informed the trust on Wednesday that the local Habitat chapter is close to finalizing plans to build a home on a site in Adams.
 
"It would probably be about two years you would allocate to that project," Chairman Thomas Sheldon asked Austin.
 
"Yes," he replied.
 
"It would be a while before we could o anything with a property up here."

Tags: affordable housing trust,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Fin Comm Hears from Police Department, Library

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Police Chief Michael Ziemba last week explained to the Finance Committee why an additional full-time officer needs to be added to the fiscal year 2027 budget.
 
The 13 officers in the Williamstown Police Department are insufficient to maintain the department's minimal threshold of two officers on patrol per shift without employing overtime and relying on the chief and the WPD's one detective to cover patrol shifts if an officer is sick or using personal time, Ziemba explained.
 
Some of that coverage was provided in the past by part-time officers, but that option was taken away by the commonwealth's 2020 police reform act.
 
"We lost two part-timers a couple of years ago," Ziemba told the Fin Comm. "They were part-time officers, but they also worked the desk. So between the desk and the cruiser shifts, they were working 40 hours a week, the two of them. We lost them to police reform.
 
"We have seen that we're struggling to cover shifts voluntarily now. We're starting to order people to cover time-off requests. … We don't have the flexibility when somebody goes out for a surgery or sickness or maternity leave to cover that without overtime. An additional position, I believe, would alleviate that."
 
Ziemba bolstered his case by benchmarking the force against like-sized communities in Berkshire County.
 
Adams, for example, has 19 full-time officers and handled 9,241 calls last year with a population just less than 8,000 and a coverage area of 23 square miles, Ziemba said. By comparison, Williamstown has 13 officers, handled 15,000 calls for service, has a population of about 8,000 (including staff and students at Williams College) and covers 46.9 square miles.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories