WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Williams College on Thursday issued updated, more stringent regulations for students returning this month.
And the dean of the college noted that violations of the school's COVID-19 safety protocols could lead to "probation, suspension or expulsion."
In a letter to students posted on the college's website, Dean Marlene Sandstrom cites "shifting national conditions" and updated guidance from the commonwealth for changes to the rules that will govern students returning to the college.
One day after Smith College in Northampton announced that it will be going fully remote for the fall semester, Williams told students that they will be quarantined in their dorm rooms until they have received two negative COVID-19 tests.
When Williams first announced its return to school plan, it included a requirement that students quarantine until after their initial test came up negative. Students were told to anticipate being kept in their dorm rooms for a couple of days.
"Initial quarantine is expected to last a minimum of five to seven days," the Thursday letter reads. "During this time, students will only be allowed to leave their rooms to use the bathroom and to go to the testing site for their second test."
Students will be required to remain on campus "at least through September." "Off-campus destinations — even within Berkshire County — will be prohibited during this time."
The college will begin the year in a "campus quarantine" until at least the end of September, Sandstrom wrote. She specifically mentioned the Stop & Shop, just over the town line in North Adams, and Walmart as off-limits destinations.
Students will not be allowed to use their personal vehicles, though they can "exercise or hike" in the surrounding areas.
If health conditions permit, Williams College students will be able to visit off-campus sites in Berkshire County only, except in the case of medical or family emergencies, and students now will initially be tested once per week.
"Any student who misses more than one test will not be able to remain on campus," the letter reads. "Their enrollment status will immediately be changed from in-person to remote, and they will no longer have access to any campus buildings or resources."
In another change, the college is now asking students to self-quarantine for 14 days before their arrival on campus, and the school "strongly recommends" that family members do not accompany students to campus.
Sandstrom notes that "an increasing number of faculty members (more than half so far)" are planning to teach their courses remotely, and that number could go up. She notes that even students living on campus will be attending "all or a significant number" of classes virtually.
Sandstrom repeated a message delivered by President Maud Mandel when she announced the original return to school plan earlier this summer: In-person instruction only will work if everyone follows the rules.
"Our ability to welcome students back to campus is possible only if all community members act in a manner consistent with our protective measures," Sandstrom wrote. "We are holding all students accountable to our public health guidelines — this includes students living in our residence halls, as well as students who are enrolled in person and living nearby in off-campus housing."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter. click for more
Developer David Traggorth asked the trustees to make the contribution from its coffers to help unlock an additional $5.4 million in state funds for the planned 54-unit apartment building at the south end of the Cable Mills site.
click for more
The donors, who wish to remain anonymous, say the gift reflects their desire to not only support Williams but also President Maud S. Mandel's strategic vision and plan for the college.
click for more
Neighbors of a proposed subdivision off Summer Street last week asked the Planning Board to take a critical look at the project, which the residents say is out of scale to the neighborhood. click for more