image description

Dalton Will Reopen Town Hall, Continue Virtual Meetings

By Joe DurwiniBerkshires Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story

DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to open Town Hall for business by the beginning of next month, but will continue to hold its meetings remotely for the time being.

With a variety of new safety features in places and consistently reassuring numbers in Dalton throughout recent weeks, town is staged to reopen access to key town offices to the public by the first week of April.

"We're in a much better situation than we were a year ago," said Jayne Smith, the town's health agent, who detailed signage, workplace barriers and other provisions put in place in the building.

The board also opted to move forward with the installation of a new glass door inside the entrance to Town Hall, separating the hallway into a more contained vestibule area.

The board also wanted to know about the possibility of resuming its own meetings in person, for which Smith outlined two options. In the first scenario, members of the Select Board could meet with each other in person while still broadcasting it as a remote meeting for the purposes of public participation. By law, no members of the public would be allowed to be present in person if it is also being conducted as a Zoom meeting.

Technological obstacles may be a factor with this as well; it was noted that some in-person/Zoom hybrid meetings attempted by the Finance Committee had been largely inaudible for remote viewers.

The second option would be to have in-person meetings that are fully open to the public, but also stay within compliance of state mandates.

"The issue that you run into there, is that we would still be looking at capacity limits, and we would also be drastically increasing the bubble of people that are meeting face to face," Smith told them.

The Select Board agreed that with current caps on capacity for the Senior Center, it could run into trouble if more members of the public showed up than the room could accommodate.

"After hearing some of these things, I'm concerned about access for our residents to hear the conversations going on, and confusion about whether or not residents can or can't come," said Select Board member Joseph Diver, "Maybe we should continue to do what we are doing now until we can truly have public meetings."

The board concurred, and will continue to host its meetings remotely until further notice.

It has not been decided yet what form Dalton's annual town meeting will take. One possibility is to hold it in the Nessacus Middle School gymnasium, with chairs spaced and doors open for ventilation, as was done in 2020.

Alternately, its auditorium could be used, but Smith expressed concerns about the lack of windows and whether it could accommodate as many safely. The third option under consideration is to hold an outdoor meeting.

The Select Board will review the information concerning each option, and take up discussion of the annual town meeting location at its next weekly meeting.


Tags: COVID-19,   town hall,   


More Coronavirus Updates

Keep up to date on the latest COVID-19 news:


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories