image description
The City Council wants the attorney general's office to look into the permitting process that lead to the South Street cell tower's construction.

Pittsfield Council to Send AG Letter About South St. Cell Tower

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday voted to send a letter to Attorney General Maura Healey requesting an investigation on the permitting process for the Verizon cell tower at 877 South St.

Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio submitted the petition because he feels the process was flawed from the beginning. It was amended and passed with Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo voting in opposition and Councilor at Large Yuki Cohen absent.

Caccamo didn’t believe they should send the letter because there is an ongoing case in the Appeals Court on the cell tower.

The council voted to simplify the petition to ask for an investigation on the permitting process. Originally, it had included language about a "lack of abutter notices and  public participation in a residential  neighborhood affected area during a Global Pandemic."

In August 2020, a Verizon cell tower was constructed in the southeast corner of a South Street property near a residential area. The company received permitting from the Zoning Board of Appeals in 2017.

Alma Street resident Courtney Gilardi and her daughter Amelia Gilardi have spoken consistently at public meetings since the cell tower was erected, reporting health complications her family and neighbors are having from the technology.  

The situation has frequented the media and earlier this month, state Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier addressed it in a state legislative hearing.

The cell tower is also a matter pending before the Appeals Court on the special permit that was litigated in the Superior Court.

Maffuccio said he thinks the council needs to do some investigating and figure out why this tower came to fruition where it did, speculating that something went wrong in the process.

"I think that because we were in a pandemic that there was no proper public participation in the cell tower, I think that something went wrong, its placement within 100 feet of a neighborhood," he said.

"I think that we as a council should do some investigating and figure out if they played a role in this and that’s why people didn't have as much participation as they should have, are we lacking that or is somebody taking advantage of it, pushing permits through and not have that public participation."


Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi said the process was flawed long before the pandemic because the ZBA granted a special permit in 2017.

"It all goes back to the Zoning Board of Appeals, they have the plans at the meeting, they saw it, they saw it was 877 South St. and they still approved it when it was so close to a residential neighborhood on the opposite end of where the address was in the permit," he said.

"So the Zoning Board saw this and I'm not pointing fingers anywhere, but let's not say that we don't want a board to take the blame because they knew about this, they have all the plans in front of them."

Many of the councilors agreed that the 877 South St. location is deceptive, as the property spans from South Street almost to Holmes Road.

Councilor at Large Pete White thought the original language of the petition seemed accusatory to the city’s own departments.

"I think there are questions about the abutter notices, but we also know that through this process we've proven there are potentially flaws in our own systems of how people are notified, so the wording makes me a little uncomfortable."

White said the more appropriate thing to have the attorney general investigate is whether or not the address of the cell tower is deceptive.

Following suit with other letters from the council, it will be written by President Peter Marchetti with the information from the passed petition and sent to Healey's office.

City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta said he can't speak for what will happen after the letter is sent, but that it is likely it will get suspended because the issue before the Appeals Court is the abutter notifications, and if the zoning ordinances and state law were followed.

"My assumption is that the [Attorney General's] office would wait until the Appeals Court weighs in before that," he added.


Tags: attorney general,   cell tower,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Possible Measles Exposure at Boston, Logan

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Public Health confirmed Wednesday that an out-of-state adult visitor who spent time in Boston and Westborough earlier this month was diagnosed with measles and was present in a number of locations.
 
This could have resulted in other people being exposed to measles virus.
 
The visitor arrived at Logan International Airport on American Airlines flight 2384 from Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, on Dec. 11 at 2:39 p.m. They stayed at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Boston-Westborough in Westborough and departed the state on Dec. 12 via Logan at 9:19 p.m. on JetBlue flight 117 to Las Vegas.
 
DPH is working with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and local partners to identify and notify those who may have been exposed to measles from this individual.
 
"Measles is a highly contagious, airborne disease, which has increased significantly in the United States because of the unfortunate decrease in vaccination rates. It is also a preventable disease," said Public Health Commissioner Dr. Robbie Goldstein. "This current situation serves as an important reminder of the critical role vaccination plays in protecting our communities. While Massachusetts has not had a measles case this year, 2025 saw the highest number of nationwide cases in more than a decade — nearly 2,000 in 44 jurisdictions, and sadly, three deaths. 
 
"Fifteen years ago, measles had been considered eliminated in the United States, but that tremendous progress is at risk. Vaccines are one of the most important public health interventions ever — they are safe, effective, and lifesaving."
 
Measles is very contagious. However, the risk to most people in Massachusetts is low because the vaccination rate in the state is high. People who are not immune and visited any of the locations on the following dates and times may be at risk for developing measles.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories