image description
The City Council wants the attorney general's office to look into the permitting process that lead to the South Street cell tower's construction.

Pittsfield Council to Send AG Letter About South St. Cell Tower

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday voted to send a letter to Attorney General Maura Healey requesting an investigation on the permitting process for the Verizon cell tower at 877 South St.

Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio submitted the petition because he feels the process was flawed from the beginning. It was amended and passed with Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo voting in opposition and Councilor at Large Yuki Cohen absent.

Caccamo didn’t believe they should send the letter because there is an ongoing case in the Appeals Court on the cell tower.

The council voted to simplify the petition to ask for an investigation on the permitting process. Originally, it had included language about a "lack of abutter notices and  public participation in a residential  neighborhood affected area during a Global Pandemic."

In August 2020, a Verizon cell tower was constructed in the southeast corner of a South Street property near a residential area. The company received permitting from the Zoning Board of Appeals in 2017.

Alma Street resident Courtney Gilardi and her daughter Amelia Gilardi have spoken consistently at public meetings since the cell tower was erected, reporting health complications her family and neighbors are having from the technology.  

The situation has frequented the media and earlier this month, state Rep. Tricia Farley-Bouvier addressed it in a state legislative hearing.

The cell tower is also a matter pending before the Appeals Court on the special permit that was litigated in the Superior Court.

Maffuccio said he thinks the council needs to do some investigating and figure out why this tower came to fruition where it did, speculating that something went wrong in the process.

"I think that because we were in a pandemic that there was no proper public participation in the cell tower, I think that something went wrong, its placement within 100 feet of a neighborhood," he said.

"I think that we as a council should do some investigating and figure out if they played a role in this and that’s why people didn't have as much participation as they should have, are we lacking that or is somebody taking advantage of it, pushing permits through and not have that public participation."


Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi said the process was flawed long before the pandemic because the ZBA granted a special permit in 2017.

"It all goes back to the Zoning Board of Appeals, they have the plans at the meeting, they saw it, they saw it was 877 South St. and they still approved it when it was so close to a residential neighborhood on the opposite end of where the address was in the permit," he said.

"So the Zoning Board saw this and I'm not pointing fingers anywhere, but let's not say that we don't want a board to take the blame because they knew about this, they have all the plans in front of them."

Many of the councilors agreed that the 877 South St. location is deceptive, as the property spans from South Street almost to Holmes Road.

Councilor at Large Pete White thought the original language of the petition seemed accusatory to the city’s own departments.

"I think there are questions about the abutter notices, but we also know that through this process we've proven there are potentially flaws in our own systems of how people are notified, so the wording makes me a little uncomfortable."

White said the more appropriate thing to have the attorney general investigate is whether or not the address of the cell tower is deceptive.

Following suit with other letters from the council, it will be written by President Peter Marchetti with the information from the passed petition and sent to Healey's office.

City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta said he can't speak for what will happen after the letter is sent, but that it is likely it will get suspended because the issue before the Appeals Court is the abutter notifications, and if the zoning ordinances and state law were followed.

"My assumption is that the [Attorney General's] office would wait until the Appeals Court weighs in before that," he added.


Tags: attorney general,   cell tower,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $82M Budget, $1.5M Cuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school budget is less grim than the original proposal but still requires more than $1.5 million in cuts.

On Thursday, the School Committee approved an $82.8 million spending plan for fiscal year 2025, including a city appropriation of $80.4 million and $2.4 million in Chapter 70 funds.

The cuts made to balance the budget include about 50 staff reductions — some due to the sunsetting of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds.

"The final version does not answer all needs. It will be unacceptable to some or to many but I must say that tonight's final proposal is very different than where we started when we believed we would have a $3,600,000 reduction. I want to assure everyone that every effort has been made to minimize the impact on both students, families, and staff members while also ensuring that our district has the necessary resources to progress forward," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"Nevertheless, there are incredibly passionate, dedicated staff members who will not be with us next year. This pains me as I've been a part of this organization for now 30 years so I want to assure everyone that our team, this has weighed very heavily in our hearts, this entire process. This is not a group of people that is looking at a spreadsheet saying ‘Well that can go and this can go’ and take that lightly."

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke and other officials worked with the state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education to rectify an error in the Chapter 70 funding formula, recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, and added an additional $2.4 million to the FY25 budget.

Curtis commented that when he first saw the governor’s FY25 budget, he was "rather stunned."

"The extraordinary circumstances we face this budget season by the conclusion of the substantial ESSER federal grant and a significant reduction in Chapter 70 allotment caused challenges for this team and our school principals and our educators and our staff that have been nothing short of all-consuming," he said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories