Lanesborough Police Station Committee Considering Temporary Site

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Police Station Committee is strongly considering a property at 545 South Main St. a site for a temporary police station, as plans for the new station are being discussed.

Members of the committee have already conducted a visit to the site and will be doing another this week. The committee said, if chosen and approved, the site would not need significant work to become a temporary station.

Board Chair Kristen Tool said getting the Police Department out of the current building is a priority. She argued the committee must find a temporary station, regardless of what the town decides with the new and current ones.

"The first priority is getting everybody out of that garbage building and into the temporary place as soon as possible," she said. "And then we'll be able to really look at the [8 Prospect St.] site and see what we can figure out for it."

Police Chief Robert Derksen said he is in the process of getting an alarm and camera system figured out for a temporary location. He said moving the internet to a new building will be handled by the state, which provides police departments a secure router with access to the criminal database.

"There's no fee associated with that. The state provides a tech that will move the equipment, but there shouldn't be any cost to the town," he said.


Tool said she has reached out to Williams College about possibly getting donated furniture for the temporary location.

"We'll be able to get desks and things and not have to move the old desks from the old building," she said. "I'm talking with someone at Williams this week to see what we can figure out from there."

The board also discussed potential questions for Brian Humes of Jacunski & Humes Architects, who will be meeting with the committee on Thursday via Zoom. The committee discussed several issues with the 8 Prospect St. site that the committee will have to consider and ask Humes about, such as its size and parking.

Tool said it is ultimately the community's decision at town meeting whether the new station is at 8 Prospect or not. She said she hopes Humes can clear up any questions the board may have on Thursday.

"I think it is important, on top of our own personal opinions, to consider what community members are saying and what Brian Humes is saying; he is a professional, and John Goerlach," she said. "They've already said that there's going to be challenges on the site. Because of the size of it, because of the hill. There are already challenges now in the smaller building."

Tool said she has asked Humes previously how difficult it would be to put one of the previously proposed designs at a different location, and he told her it would be simple.

"He said that it's just so easy, it's so easy to do that. So that works is already done. So we wouldn't have to be designing a whole new building. We can use one of the two that are already proposed," she said.


Tags: police station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Mall Owners Press for Road District Dissolution

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Berkshire Mall owner JMJ RE Holdings says without a dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District, the potential sale and redevelopment with the mall would fall through.
 
The Select Board last week authorized two of its members to work on a compromise between the JMJ and the road district. The two entities have been at loggerheads over assessments to the district — and the district's purpose.
 
Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings, recently responded to iBerkshires' coverage of the meeting, during which the board discussed mediation but took no comments from the public or the mall owners. 
 
Grogan said JMJ has been under purchase contract with real estate developer Cypress Equities since May and has an intention to close in the fall.
 
"We are contractually obligated to deliver the property with the BHRD dissolved. If that does not happen, the mall will not get redeveloped. If the BHRD is not dissolved, the transaction with Cypress cannot close," said Grogan over email. "That is not a position JMJ adopted as leverage. It is the express term of a fully executed purchase and sale agreement. Should the town proceed in a manner that departs from the existing settlement framework, JMJ will evaluate all available claims to protect its contractual rights."
 
The town had initially agreed to seek the dissolution of the district through the Legislature based on JMJ paying $1.1 million to resolve all tax disputes. But that article was pulled from the annual town meeting when town officials said the mall's owners failed to make payment by the deadline. 
 
The road district was established 40 years ago to maintain the Connector Road between Routes 7 and 8 and assess the mall for fire and police protection. The mall closed in 2019 and its various owners since then have sought to redevelop the property. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories