image description
The Planning Board on Monday discusses development of a zoning map that will prohibit commercial solar arrays in some areas.

BRPC to Help Lanesborough Develop Solar Overlay District

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town is seeking help from the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission to creating a zoning overlay to restrict areas for solar fields.

Consulting Planner Andrew Groff told the Planning Board on Monday that a state District Local Technical Assistance grant was received after it was applied for in February. With this program, BRPC staff provides technical assistance to communities at no cost on eligible projects.

BRPC will conduct a mapping analysis of the risk of solar developments on certain parcels and with the information from the study, the board will develop a solar overlay district that puts acceptable limits on solar panel fields.

The planners would like to prohibit solar fields from places where they will have a negative impact on the landscape.

"We have a planner from Berkshire Regional Planning, Cara Farrell, is going to be helping us with this concept of an overlay district for these big large-scale solar developments like we've seen along Route 7 the past couple of years," Groff explained.

"We are working on this concept of an overlay based on mapping that identifies our development pressure and scenic and sensitive landscapes that the town wants to protect, so it will accomplish two things: It will direct the development appropriately and also, perhaps make it slightly easier to permit, give everybody a clear path forward."

The town currently has four solar field developments that are allowed through special permit as long as development standards in the zoning have been met.

This has been a major concern to the board in the last couple of years because of development pressure from large solar concerns.


The overlay district is not a new proposal, as it was being discussed in 2020 when a public hearing for three large solar arrays with permits extended in 2019 was on the agenda.

The board also discussed the taxation of the solar fields. The town's major ones are taxed with payments in lieu of taxes, or PILOTs. These payments are requested by the town from a nonprofit organization that owns tax-exempt property.

Groff reported that the Legislature is trying to make solar arrays clearly taxable. During the 2019-2020 legislative session, there were two related proposals introduced by state Sen. Michael Rodrigues of Westport and state Rep. Jeffrey Roy of Franklin.

In December 2020, State Auditor Suzanne Bump conducted a study that makes recommendations for equitably treating developers and producers of solar power while allowing for the taxation of their facilities for our resource-stressed municipalities.

The board also speculated whether there is a consequence in the PILOT agreement if the taxes aren’t paid or not.

In other news, the panel approved a survey plan for Pillar LLC at 550 North Main St. The parcel has a large-scale solar farm with a currently abandoned single-family house in front of the solar field and the developer wants to cut the building lot off, renovate the house, and sell it.


Tags: solar,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories