Letter: Delay Vote on New Williamstown Fire Station

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor,

There is no question that the Williamstown Fire District needs a new modern facility to replace its antiquated 73-year-old Water Street station. While a new fire station is long overdue, the proposed $25 million building is challenging to justify.

In response to concerns about the size and cost of the project, the district recently released a "Comparison of Size of Proposed Williamstown Fire Station to Other Fire Stations" study on its official website and Facebook page. However, the comparison study overlooks several details and, when thoroughly examined, provides the best evidence why the Feb. 28 vote should be postponed so a re-evaluation can occur, and a new design can be presented for consideration.

In summary, a breakdown of the comparison study reveals the following:

• Every community listed has a population greater than Williamstown, excluding Wellfleet (Armonk, N.Y., is a hamlet of North Castle, population 11,765.)

• Every community is a full-time agency, or a full-time department complemented by call or volunteer firefighters, excluding both Armonk and Putnam Valley.

• Every fire department provides ambulance service to their community, excluding Newton (7,500 fire calls for service) and Putnam Valley, N.Y., (472 fire calls for service), both fire service-only agencies.


• Every fire department listed receives more calls for service compared to Williamstown (less than 300 a year) and, in almost every instance, by several thousand.

• Williamstown has seven pieces of equipment. All the communities listed that only have a single fire station (as proposed in Williamstown), has more equipment, sometimes doubling Williamstown (e.g., Foxborough 14, Plainville 13, Wellfleet 10)

• The new Plainville Fire Department was constructed as a combined municipal complex that accommodates the new police department and town hall. The construction cost for the police, fire, and town hall was $34 million.

The district provided regional data on new fire departments but curiously bypassed a local project. On Dec. 8, 2022, voters in Lenox unanimously approved a $20 million public safety complex to house their police, fire, and ambulance. The Lenox FD is a full-time department complemented by reserve/volunteer firefighters and responded to 1,873 calls for service in 2021. It is fiscally irresponsible to ask the Williamstown voters to approve a $25 million stand-alone fire station without studying how Lenox can build a public safety complex for $5 million less.

Williamstown requires a new fire station; however, the project must be realistic to our community and not jeopardize current government services and future projects.

Scott E. McGowan
Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

 


Tags: fire station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

AG Clears Williamstown Select Board in Open Meeting Complaint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office on Wednesday cleared the Select Board in an Open Meeting Law complaint filed by iBerkshires.com while simultaneously confirming the supposition at the heart of the complaint.
 
The AGO found that the board did technically violate the OML when it moved to executive session on May 11, a misstep the board previously acknowledged in its response to the complaint.
 
The meeting in question was held behind closed doors to discuss the town's response to a proposal from Williams College to acquire the former town garage site at 59 Water St.
 
At the time of the May 11 meeting, the board had held no public discussion, let alone a vote, on whether to enter into negotiations with Williams, the lone respondent to a request for proposals issued by the town for the 1.27-acre parcel.
 
The board cited an exception to the Open Meeting Law that states executive sessions are appropriate if, "holding the discussion in open session may have a detrimental effect on the Board's negotiating position."
 
iBerkshires.com maintained in its complaint that the executive session was premature given the fact that the board on May 11 had no one to negotiate with as it had not agreed — publicly — to negotiate with the college.
 
The news organization cited the fact that the town's RFP clearly indicated a multi-step process in which the board first would decide whether to engage with any of the respondents (assuming multiple bids were made) and then enter into negotiation with one of the respondents.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories