Letter: MCLA Homeless Shelter Should Have Had Public Input

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I question MCLA's President Birge's commitment to education and to our North Berkshire community.

"… the historic public purpose of American higher education is to respond to the needs and demands of society." President Jamie Birge, WAMC 5/10/2023

The problem of the poor and unhoused is a symptom of a decline in democratic values and income inequality. A simple change in the earned income tax credit was able to cut child poverty by about 46 percent in just a few months.

Massachusetts needs more than 200,000 new homes in order to start addressing the housing crisis. What is stopping Massachusetts from building these homes? Powerful interests who do not have a modicum of decency prevent democratic actions to address our problems. Democracy means participation and engagement. It requires leaders to inspire open and respectful dialogue to address the needs of the people.

In 2014, North Adams Regional Hospital was closed with three days notice with no public hearing. Shortly after the hospital closing, the state closed our North Adams welfare office and our North Adams employment office with no public hearing.



In order to respond to our community's needs and demands, President Birge should have held public meetings and panel discussions on the proposed emergency shelter and its effects on the future of the college and our community. The college could have educated the community about the crisis and provided a forum for an informed and respectful discussion.

Instead President Birge chose to keep his own counsel and avoided an encounter with the public. He acted as if it was his decision alone and failed to include the community input.

Our society is suffering from people who act like autocrats and reject the democratic process of inclusion. There is still time for the college to provide the leadership in an open and inclusive educational forum that addresses the needs of the poor and unsheltered.

Richard Dassatti
North Adams, Mass. 


Tags: homeless,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Worked With Both, Voting One

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The question of experience comes up during elections. At nearly 80, John Barrett III unquestionably has more years with nearly half a century as a career politician, but longevity does not guarantee stronger leadership or better outcomes, especially if we are looking forward to 10 years. Andrew Fitch who has worked non-political jobs across a wider range of roles in half that time, can bring broader skills, fresh perspectives, and a more adaptable approach to public service.

Election results show that years served do not define effectiveness or one would have the people's support. The majority, 60 percent, voted against Barrett in this same state primary nine years ago. Longevity matters, but so do community connection, collaboration, and the ability to evolve with changing needs. Serving as a state representative is very different from being a mayor. A representative is one of 160 members, not a singular executive authority, and the role requires coalition building, negotiation, and networking which has never been one of Barrett's finest attributes.

Long-standing community priorities require consistent advocacy, such as completing the North Adams bike path connection to Adams and Williamstown. Former state Rep. Gail Cariddi championed this project, and Barrett said he would finish her work when he first ran, yet North Adams is no further along. In contrast, Fitch on the City Council is respectful but persistent, pushing issues until answers, progress, and resolutions emerge.

We need someone who works well with others, not someone who relies on intimidation or positional authority. A heavy-handed style doesn't work in a large legislative body, with members averaging 30 years younger than Barrett. Small wins may look like progress, but the state distributes billions of which some reaches us no matter who holds the seat. The real question is whether we could secure more funding for roads, infrastructure, public safety, and economic development, or is the status quo of what we received the past 10 years acceptable to you?

Having served alongside both candidates on the council, I've seen how their styles shape outcomes. While one on council struggled to gain support for anything because their authoritarian approach created conflict, the other has consistently moved ideas forward through collaboration and shared credit.

That contrast may explain why Fitch consecutively lands first for City Council elections, and Barrett — despite his years as mayor before losing two elections — finished sixth. For me, the choice is straightforward: Andrew Fitch for State Representative.

Keith Bona
North Adams, Mass. 

Keith Bona is a North Adams city councilor.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories