Dalton Select Board Turns Down Citizens' Energy Credit Offer

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board voted last week to decline a proposal from Citizens Enterprises Corp. for a solar alternative on-bill credit agreement under the Solar Massachusetts Renewable Target program.
 
Citizens Energy, a non-profit energy company, is planning a 13-acre solar farm off Bridle Road. 
 
The town already has sufficient net metering credits for its current electricity supply through Rockwood and would not be able to absorb the credits offered by Citizens, Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson’s preliminary report said.
 
The net metering and on-bill crediting are largely the same in that they allow for excess energy generation from one account to be credited on another account, although there are differences in how the credits are calculated and reported. The state has phased out net metering for new large solar projects.
 
The Rockwood agreement is for 10 years at a 17.5 percent discount. 
 
The Citizens agreement offered a 20-year 215,000 kilowatt per year contract with a 15 percent fixed discount that could accumulate $48,000 a year of credit on the town's Eversouce bill. 
 
The contract value is $215,000 in year one. Right now, Eversource's basic service rate, also referred to as the "alternative on bill credit rate," is 22.5 cents. 
 
Citizens would have to "dedicate half of the production to 'anchor' customers, such as municipalities, and half to low-income residents, as defined by Eversource's R-2 and R-4 ratepayer designations," Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson's preliminary report stated. 
 
Although Citizens typically tries to find customers in neighboring communities, there isn't a limit as to where it can bring low-energy cost savings.
 
According to the preliminary report, Pittsfield currently has 4,300 R-2 households and North Adams has about 1,400 so citizens should be able to find local customers but they are not required by the state to limit their low-income distribution to local households.
 
"We will certainly try to work with the Town boards and agencies to find local customers, and give them priority when signing up, but we will not be in a position to limit our outreach efforts as filling the array efficiently with LMI customers is typically a difficult and time consuming process," Citizens said in a statement. 
 
During the meeting on June 12, the board expressed that it wanted to ensure that the benefits from the solar energy project would help Western Mass residents and not go to the east side of the state if not enough residents applied. 
 
"The SMART program has recently shifted and allows for credits on Eversource to cross load zones …So Eversource eastern Massachusetts residents, low-income residents would take advantage of this project as well," Byrne said at that meeting. 
 
Prior to starting construction, Citizens Energy will still be paying outstanding back taxes and has been in discussion with the town tax assessor and treasurer. It would also negotiate a payment in lieu of taxes with the town or through the assessed value of a personal property.
 
Citizens have worked with KP Law in the past and are familiar with their approach. The town has already begun the process of reviewing the PILOT's form. 

Tags: solar array,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield: Should Park Square Be an Historic District?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The committee drafting a proposed local historic district around Park Square wants to generate interest and participation in the process. 

Members launched the charge during meetings in August and September. A survey and public hearing are planned to gather feedback early on. 

City Planner Kevin Rayner explained they are not just doing this out of a love for historic buildings, but for the timeless sense of place you get when you step into Park Square, which was laid out over 200 years ago and hosted the first-ever agricultural fair in 1810. 

"I think that the main thing that we need to kind of park on is that this is the heart of our community, and it really sets the stage for the sense of place in Pittsfield, and any change to that should have some review and some consensus from folks who have a passion for protecting the history and that character of Pittsfield," he said to the new Local Historic District Study Committee last week. 

"And there's that private property versus historic resource thing, but I’d say that a lot of these buildings on the square belong to the soul of Pittsfield here, and deserve to be protected, and I don't think that the layer of regulation that we're throwing down here is going to be unreasonable or a real boundary." 

In March, the City Council voted to amend the City Code, Chapter 2, to establish the study committee.

Pittsfield has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings. The central area was laid out a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761.

A district can be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings; the committee has authority to say a building in the district cannot be demolished. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories