Lanesborough Planner Pays Penalty for Conflict-of-Interest Violation

Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Lanesborough Economic Development Committee Chair and Planning Board member Barbara Davis-Hassan paid a $30,000 penalty for violating the state's conflict of interest law.
 
The State Ethics Commission has issued a final decision and order allowing a joint motion to dismiss and approving a disposition agreement in which Davis-Hassan admits to violating the conflict of interest law by participating as a Planning Board member in a proposal to rezone the Berkshire Mall while she privately had an exclusive marketing agreement to sell the property, by representing the mall's owner in local tax and infrastructure matters, and by participating as a Planning Board member in a proposal to rezone a second property while privately serving as its listing agent.
 
The commission accepted Davis-Hassan's payment of a $30,000 civil penalty and dismissed the adjudicatory proceeding against her.
 
Davis-Hassan, who owns and operates Barb Hassan Realty, had an exclusive marketing agreement to lease space in or sell the Berkshire Mall when she participated as a Planning Board member in a proposal to rezone the mall property to facilitate redevelopment. After Lanesborough town meeting approved the rezoning, the mall sold in July 2022 for $8 million and Davis-Hassan received a $240,000 commission on the sale.
 
Through these actions as a Planning Board member, Davis-Hassan violated the conflict of interest law's prohibition against public employees participating officially in matters in which they or their business have a financial interest. In addition to her actions concerning the mall property, Davis-Hassan also violated this prohibition in 2020, when she participated as a Planning Board member in discussing a proposal to rezone a Williamstown Road property for which she was the listing agent. That property later sold for $250,000, and Davis-Hassan received a $25,000 commission on the sale.
 
The conflict of interest law also prohibits municipal employees from acting as agent for anyone other than the municipality in connection with matters in which the municipality is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. Davis-Hassan violated this prohibition by representing Berkshire Mall owner Durga Property Holdings Inc. in Lanesborough-related matters in 2019 and 2020. 
 
During this time, Davis-Hassan appeared on Durga's behalf before the Baker Hill Road District (BHRD), an entity that assesses and collects taxes on properties within the district for road maintenance and municipal services. 
 
In at least one of her appearances, Davis-Hassan asked questions intended to demonstrate that the BHRD should be dissolved. She later, on behalf of Durga, sent draft proposals to the Lanesborough town manager to dissolve the BHRD, and communicated with the town manager and a member of the Legislature on behalf of Durga regarding the dissolution of the BHRD. Davis-Hassan also applied to the Lanesborough Board of Assessors for a tax abatement on Durga's behalf, appeared for Durga before the Board of Assessors regarding the tax abatement application, and, on behalf of Durga, emailed the Lanesborough Board of Selectmen regarding an application for a grant to address water and sewer concerns at the mall.
 

 


Tags: conflict of interest,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough 2025 Year in Review: What's Going On With the Berkshire Mall?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass.— The town's biggest headline in 2025 was the Berkshire Mall. 

There wasn't much news about the shuttered property since owners, JMJ Holdings, announced that they were pivoting from cannabis cultivation to senior living in 2023.  The Select Board ordered them to pay unsettled taxes in late 2024, and lawsuits transpired. 

JMJ and the Baker Hill Road District remain in a standoff over unpaid taxes for the Route 7/8 Connector Road.  JMJ argues that they are being under-represented and over-taxed by the independent municipal district and want it dissolved, while the BHRD wants to take the mall back. 

The Berkshire Mall closed more than five years ago and has sat vacant since.

Its current owners are planning an assisted living, mixed-use build, and secured Integritus Healthcare as a partner.  First, the decrepit mall must be taken down. 

In May, JMJ reported that the project was entering the design process for a nine-figure overhaul of the property into 420 to 450 units of senior housing, and it was confirmed that town taxes were paid, totaling $293,380. 

The holdings company filed a lawsuit against the BHRD, which had filed a December 2024 lawsuit seeking $545,000 for taxes due in May 2024.  JMJ said the property is charged six times more taxes than other Lanesborough businesses. 

In August, JMJ announced that it is partnering with a local health-care company, Integritus Healthcare, to bolster its plans for hundreds of senior housing units.

View Full Story

More Lanesborough Stories