Dalton Board of Health Works to Modify its Demolition Guidelines Checklist

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Board of Health will collaborate with the building department to modify the demolition guidelines checklist. 
 
The current checklist does not clearly outline the board's responsibilities when approving a demolition or the items the board is responsible for, Health Agent Agnes Witkowski said. 
 
The building inspector suggested that the board adopt the checklist, which came from another town.
 
Previous board members approved adopting it in 2022 but since then people have been directed to go to the Board of Health regarding demolitions. This checklist is separate from the building department's demolition program. 
 
"My understanding is it is the building inspectors responsible to sign off on the permit. I know some Board of Health's would get a copy of the road report and asbestos report and give that to the building inspector but it seems like this is becoming more of a board of health's responsibility," Witkowski said. 
 
According to attorney Nicole Costanzo, state building codes require "jurisdictional cooperation" from a number of departments to provide assistance for the building inspector. The building inspector is responsible for ensuring all laws and ordinances are complied with. 
 
The building inspector does have a program that allows these various departments to go in and sign off on the demolition indicating they do not have any concerns or issues. This program also has a box so the department can include conditions or comments, Costanzo said. 
 
The Board of Health's checklist starts as an informational document to inform residents of the steps they need to take for demolition approval. 
 
"My understanding at one point was an information sheet to make sure that these things are being done but now it's becoming part of the Board of Health's responsibility to be collecting this, answering questions, guiding [the resident,] inspecting the building, and for all these things to be done," Witkowski said. 
 
"Versus this being a checklist that should be guiding people and then that information should be uploaded into the building inspectors [program] and if the building inspector has any questions then he would converse with the Board of Health."
 
The second page then requires the health agent to sign off on the document indicating they have completed an inspection and received certain disposal information from the resident. 
 
The Board of Health's document also has a building department checklist that appears to require the inspectional official, in this case Witkowski, to review and sign off on. 
 
"Our intent was to use this as an informational sheet to people for education so that they would have something right up front to know," Witkowski said. 
 
"Now it's becoming that I'm the one that's having to follow up on and being responsible for this and signing off on this, which before this information would be just uploaded into the building permit system."
 
Witkowski is now getting questions regarding demolitions that should be going to the building inspector. 
 
Based on how it is currently written the health agent would be required to sign this document before signing off on the building inspectors program. 
 
"I think that's the first thing that the board needs to determine what your what your guidelines in your checklist actually require and what the intent of that was, to give your inspectional agents some idea of what they're required to do when they receive a request from someone who's applied for a demolition permit," Costanzo said. 
 
"... looking at this, in my opinion I'm not aware of any regulation that requires a local Board of Health to certify compliance with asbestos regulations…with that exception, that the building code does require jurisdictional cooperation from the Board Of Health when the building inspector is seeking guidance from them with respect to issuance of any permits."
 
If an owner wants to tear down to remodel their home, the demolition permit should just go through the building department and if they have any questions the Board of Health could review the application, board member Edward Gero said. 
 
In cases where the demolition was court ordered due to situations overseen by the Health Department, whether it is rodents or public health issues, the Board of Health should then be required to review the application, he said. 

Tags: board of health,   demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Community Meeting Addresses Prejudice in Pittsfield Schools

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

Johanna Lenski, a special education surrogate parent and advocate, says there's a 'deeply troubling' professional culture at Herberg that lets discriminatory actions and language slip by.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Around 60 community members gathered at Conte Community School on Monday night to discuss issues with prejudice in the district. 

The event was hosted by the Pittsfield Public Schools in partnership with the Berkshire NAACP and the Westside Legends. It began with breaking bread in the school's cafeteria, and caregivers then expressed fears about children's safety due to bullying, a lack of support for children who need it the most, and teachers using discriminatory and racist language. 

"One thing I've learned is that as we try to improve, things look really bad because we're being open about ways that we're trying to improve, and I think it's really important that we acknowledge that," interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips said, reflecting on her work in several other districts before coming to PPS last summer.  

"It is very easy to stay at the surface and try to look really good, and it may look like others are better than us, when they're really just doing a better job of just kind of maintaining the status quo and sweeping things under the carpet."

Brett Random, the executive director of Berkshire County Head Start, wrote on her personal Facebook page that her daughter reported her math teacher, "used extremely offensive language including both a racial slur (n-word) and a homophobic slur (f-word) and then reportedly tried to push other students to repeat those words later in the day when students were questioning her on her behavior."

The school department confirmed that an eighth-grade teacher at the middle school was placed on leave.  

The Berkshire Eagle, which first reported on the incident, identified the teacher as Rebecca Nitsche, and the teacher told the paper over the phone, "All I can tell you is it's not how it appears." Nitsche told the paper she repeated the words a student used while reporting the incident to another teacher because officials needed to know it happened. 

Johanna Lenski, speaking as a special education surrogate parent and parent advocate, on Monday said there is a "deeply troubling" professional culture at Herberg that has allowed discriminatory, racist, non-inclusive, and ableist treatment of students.

She said a Black transgender student was called a "piss poor, punk, puke of a kid," and repeatedly and intentionally misgendered by one of the school's teachers, and then wrongfully accused of physically assaulting that teacher, which resulted in a 10-day suspension. 

Another Herberg student with disabilities said the same staff member disclosed to an entire classroom that they lived in a group home and were in state Department of Children and Families' custody. When the teacher was asked to come to an individualized education program meeting for that student, Lenski said he "spent approximately 20 minutes attacking this child's character and portraying her as a problem, rather than a student in need of services and protection and support."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories