image description
The Historical Commission issued a one-year demolition delay for the former Catholic Youth Center on Melville Street. The Boys and Girls Club wants to demolish it for playground space.

Pittsfield Historical Panel Delays CYC Demolition

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Historical Commission wants to see a better effort to preserve the former Catholic Youth Center rather than a plan to level it.

On Monday, the panel issued a one-year demolition delay for the more than 75-year-old Melville Street property. The Boys and Girls Club of the Berkshires would like to demolish the CYC to make way for an expanded playground for its child-care program.

The CYC is on the commission's list of endangered properties. The club feels that it is not historic but commissioners disagree.

"I would argue that this building does, in fact, play a significant role in kind of the urban fabric of this part of downtown and the streetscape along Melville Street," Commissioner Matthew Herzberg said, adding that he recognizes the dilemma but a playground is "not a good trade."

The nonprofit purchased the abutting property in 2015 and it has reportedly been out of use since at least 2012.

"We would like to demolish the bounds of the building at this point in time because it's surplus to us," Vice President Thomas Hamel said.

"The land is most valuable to us and it would allow us to expand our child-care programs by creating a better layout of a playground. The cost to rehab this building is in excess of what our budget is and as the application shows, we believe that we would have to spend over $2 million to bring this small building to code. That would be very detrimental to our programs because it would require us to take from our program income to do this capital improvement."

He explained that the club acquired the property after the Notre Dame Church and the CYC closed its operations "in order to protect our property on Melville Street."

"We knew that it was a deteriorated building," he said. "We acquired it relatively inexpensive and we acquired it from the Springfield diocese. We agreed when we acquired it that it would not be used for any purposes inconsistent with the diocese teachings and that, in fact, is in our deed."

The boiler is "shot" and there is no heat, Hamel added. The club has demolished the rear portion of the building that had housed a basketball court because it had "deteriorated beyond a point of being usable."

"We don't see it as a historical historic building though we recognize it is over 75 years old and we respect the process of having to come before you to discuss it, dialogue it, and obtain any public input," he said, reporting no "communications from anybody in the public telling us the historic value of this building, only their historic memories."


Years ago, there was dialogue with developer David Carver about transforming it into housing but it would have required the club to substantially transfer a lot of the parking to satisfy zoning requirements and the club said, "Thank you but no thank you."

"Even the thought of David Carver coming in and making it housing, that seemed to be at one point a possibility and maybe it didn't work for you because of parking but it worked for him," Commissioner Ann-Marie Harris pointed out.

The panel also wanted a more in-depth historical analysis than what was provided, such as a Form B.  

"I feel like with the write-up that you had done, that it didn't give that justice. It went up to 1959 and it just kind of dropped," Harris said.

Commissioner Jeffry Bradway said the panel needs a lot more documentation on this property with information about its architecture, historical significance, and impact on the community.  Photographs, maps, and newspaper articles were also encouraged.

"I think this is a significant building in itself and its relationship to the neighborhood," he said.

Commissioner Carol Nichols would like the owners to explore additional options for use that salvage the building, saying, "It's beautiful, the front is gorgeous, the facade is beautiful. It does have historic significance, and I think it is a major piece of architecture in that area."

"I don't know how well you publicize it, about the building being torn down, just memories, but I wonder just how public the announcement was about the possible demolition of the building," she said.

Herzberg was hesitant about making the club put more work into its proposal because his opinion wouldn't change.

"I think it would be irresponsible of us to allow this building to be taken down without the demolition delay so for me to make a request that they jump through all these hoops and then just say, 'Well, no, I still want the demolition delay.' I'm not sure that's fair to the applicant," he said.

With the demolition delay process, the applicant holds a public meeting within 60 days and after the meeting, the one-year delay begins.


Tags: historic buildings,   historical commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories