image description
The former CYC building on Melville Street is headed for demolition. The property, owned by the Boys and Girls Club, will be transformed into a playground.

Pittsfield Commission OKs Former CYC Demolition

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Against wishes for preservation, the former Catholic Youth Center is set to be demolished.

The Historical Commission begrudgingly withdrew a one-year demolition delay on the Melville Street property, recognizing that the owners were unwilling to save or sell it.

"Very tough vote," Chair John Dickson said during the Monday meeting.

The Boys and Girls Club of the Berkshires plans to demolish the CYC to make way for an expanded playground for its child-care program. The nonprofit purchased the abutting property in 2015 and it has reportedly been out of use since at least 2012.

While the building could be structurally saved, club officials say it would be a multimillion-dollar endeavor and they are not willing to put housing in the space because they feel it would pose a risk to children in their programs.  

CEO Joseph McGovern said the board has decided not to put housing next to the front door of the club.

"I wouldn't call the neighborhood unsafe. It definitely has challenges. It's been a challenge making sure that our kids are safe. The number one thing that we do for kids here is make sure that they are safe," he said.

"The neighborhood is mostly, if not all, low-income housing and we've had a tremendous amount of, influx of homeless individuals in the neighborhood behind the railroad tracks, where our playground currently is so we have had some challenges."

Carol Nichols, the only commissioner who upheld her vote to delay demolition, said she saw a NIMBY (not in my back yard) element to this stance. She recognized that affordable housing is a "crying need" in Pittsfield.

Michael Hoffman, a Boys and Girls Club board member, had said housing could result in a person sitting on the front steps with a beer and a cigarette near where 4-year-olds walk by.  

"I understand there is a NIMBY component here, but again, I don't think it's necessarily going to be a disaster if it was housing," Nichols said.

"I don't think the challenge would be so great that the children would be put at such serious risk but I know those are your concerns."


Commissioner Matthew Herzberg said the demolition delay was likely to result in a yearlong staring contest before the building was taken down. He is disheartened by this, "a little resentful of the kind of position going forward," and joined the board in not fully agreeing with the position on housing.

On the other hand, he said delaying it would do no favors.

"Given a list of bad choices, I'd rather let the kids have their playground. I am concerned about the nature of the Boys and Girls Club, what it's going to look like, how it's going to feel on the block once the CYC comes down," he said.

"I think, frankly, it's going to be pretty ugly but OK, to me, there's just no benefit that I can see. I mean, we have an applicant who says 'We're done. We're not going to do anything.' Feels like a bit of a shakedown. Like there is no benefit, from my perspective, in dragging this out."

Hoffman said they began looking into the building's future use in 2017 and "spent a lot of time trying to find ways to enhance our ownership of the CYC and continue with what we had."

"I understand exactly what you're saying but don't think we're not wanting to consider options," he said. "We've been considering for four or five years and we had a plan in 2017 that worked. It just doesn't work anymore."

Both of the club's representatives shared sentiments about the former CYC and said this wasn't a light decision. If the demo delay goes in, demolition would be pushed to October 2025 and the building would be demolished in spring 2026.

"We truly appreciate what the dilemma is here and I don't think either way any of us wanted to be in this situation and any of us want to move forward in a way that we don't feel comfortable," McGovern said.

"We've tried to follow the process that you guys have laid out for us and we put our heart and soul into that process and we also understand that you have a job to do so whatever direction it goes in, it's going to go in. We're going to continue to try to work with you as much as we possibly can within the realm of what we feel is safe for our kids."

In August, the panel issued a one-year demolition delay and hoped that the owners would come back with another plan. The more than 75-year-old building is on the commission's list of endangered properties.

In the meantime, commissioners had a tour of the building where they saw it needed a significant amount of work.

"It's a beautiful facade and you all have done a good job maintaining that facade so that it is attractive and it fits well with the rest of your building," Dickson acknowledged.


Tags: boys and girls club,   demolition,   historic buildings,   historical commission,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories