Dalton Officials Sign Off on Bardin Land Sale

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — After navigating regulations that complicated the town's attempts to sell the Bardin property, the town is nearly rid of it. 
 
During last week's Select Board meeting, members signed the property's deed to Thomas and Esther Balardini for $150,000.  
 
This is the only offer for the property the state Department of Agricultural Resources received. 
 
The 148 acres of land, which consist of three parcels, came into the town's possession in 2016 in a taking for delinquent taxes. The town first placed a lien against the property in 2009.
 
Town meeting voted in 2022 in favor of selling the land rather than leasing it. The Select Board first announced the availability of the land during its meeting on June 27 of the same year.
 
The mandates set by an Agricultural Preservation Restriction were placed on all four parcels of the farm by its previous owner, James Edgar Bardin, for $260,000 in 1991. This APR impeded the town's previous attempts to sell the property. 
 
The Bardin estate still owns the fourth parcel in Windsor. The agreement also gives MDAR the right of first refusal if the land is to be sold.
 
The preservation program was the first of its kind in the nation when it was enacted in 1977 to
encourage farmers to maintain their land for agricultural use by paying them the difference between the fair market value and the fair market agricultural land value.
 
In exchange for this payment, there is a "permanent deed restriction which prevents any use of the property that will have a negative impact on its agricultural use," according to MDAR's guide.
 
"Since its enactment, nearly 1,000 farms totaling more than 73,000 acres have been protected, allowing farm owners to access the equity in their land while still maintaining ownership of it," Mai said previously. 
 
According to the agreement, the APR cannot be subdivided and can only be sold when unified. 
 
However, the APR became subdivided when the town took possession of three lots in Dalton, separating them from the four acres in Windsor. 
 
This issue was apparently not brought up in land court when the town took the land.
 
Although the parcels have not been unified, Mai clarified that the property sale is subject to the town's procurement process and the state's Right of First Refusal. 
 
"Neither the tax taking or the town's sale impacts the terms and provisions of the APR on the title to either the Dalton or the Windsor parcels," Mai said. 
 
"MDAR has informed current and future landowners that it would like to see the parcels held in common ownership." 
 
The buyers plan to operate a farm on the parcels in Dalton, which meet the APR's requirements. 
 
The state enacted its right of first refusal last November after the town attempted to sell the property to Charlotte Lind Crane for $150,000.
 
She had intended to build a residence on the property, which is against the APR, with the possibility of having a personal vegetable garden. 
 
Once enacted, town officials had the option to withdraw the purchase-and-sale agreement, request an extension for the buyer to submit a business plan to MDAR, or let MDAR exercise its rights. 
 
The board decided to let MDAR exercise its right to purchase the property for the proffered $150,000. 
 
Withdrawing the purchase-and-sale agreement offer would have required the board to start all over in the selling of the property. 
 
Board members chose not to ask for an extension for the buyer to submit a business plan since they believed the buyer had no intention to create a reasonable farm plan, which is required under the APR.

Tags: agricultural restriction,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Hopes for Continued Talks on Mall Sale

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is optimistic that talks for the Berkshire Mall sale will continue. 
 
Chair Deborah Maynard and Vice Chair Juli Baker were to meet with mall owner JMJ Holdings, the Baker Hill Road District, and proposed buyer Cypress Equities on Tuesday to discuss next steps. As of Wednesday, iBerkshires had received a "we are optimistic" from Maynard on the talks. The Berkshire Eagle reported a response from a Cypress representative saying talks will continue.  
 
Baker had updated the Select Board on Monday about the status of the sale and the efforts being undertaken by the renamed Baker Hill Business District.
 
Cypress Equities pulled out of a purchase-and sale-agreement with mall owner JMJ last week for the following reasons. 
  • Not enough water service/pressure to the property to support redevelopment without constructing costly water tanks.
  • The current septic system and former treatment facility is not acceptable for a project of the scale and magnitude proposed.
  • There is existing asbestos and bad soil from the treatment system that needs to be remediated off site.
  • And the current structure and tax assessment of the Baker Hill Road District.
Baker has been working with what is now being called the Baker Hill Business District and said she and the district members are happy that Cypress has decided to leave the door open to more discussions and that they have been working hard to try and address the company's needs.
 
Last month, the town had asked state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III to support the state Department of Transportation taking over the Connector Road, funding for a mall connection to Pittsfield's wastewater treatment plant and a connection to the town's water main.
 
Baker said an amendment has been drafted to cap the district's taxes to not grow more than 2.5 percent a year. She noted that, historically, taxes have not grown by more than one percent per year, so it won't be difficult to meet that cap.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories