MDAR Exercised Right of First Refusal for Dalton Bardin Property

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The town is close to being relieved of its responsibility of the so-called Bardin property. 
 
During the Select Board meeting last week it was announced that the state Department of Agricultural Resources has enacted its right of first refusal. The MDAR has rights to the property through a 30-year-old Agricultural Preservation Restriction.
 
The town owns about 148 acres of the non-working farm within Dalton; another four acres is across the border in Windsor.
 
The board signed the purchase-and-sale agreement during a meeting in September with Charlotte Lind Crane for the amount of $150,000. The state DAR had 60 days to buy the property or waive its rights.
 
Once enacted, town officials could withdraw the purchase-and-sale agreement, request an extension for the buyer to submit a business plan to MDAR, or let MDAR exercise its rights. 
 
The board decided to let MDAR exercise its right to purchase the property for the proffered $150,000. 
 
Withdrawing purchase-and-sale agreement offer would have required the board to start all over in the selling of the property. 
 
Board members chose not to ask for an extension for the buyer to submit a business plan since they believe the buyer has no intention to create a reasonable farm plan, which is required under the APR.
 
"It's my understanding. I haven't spoken with the buyer. I haven't spoken with buyer's counsel ... I don't get the sense that there's going to be a sufficient business plan submitted," Town Counsel Katharine Klein said.
 
The buyer was required to submit a business plan as part of the sale agreement. In MDAR's opinion, the document the buyer submitted is not satisfactory, partially because it's not complete, she said.
 
The document does not show how the buyer intends to farm the property and after speaking with the MDAR's council Cory Fox, the buyer and her attorney indicated there were no plans to farm the property in any extensive way, Klein said.
 
Rather, the buyer planned on building a residence on the property, which is against the APR, with the possibility of having a personal vegetable garden, she said.
 
"So I would lean towards letting MDAR take care of it; get our money and get out," Selectman Marc Strout said. 
 
Selectman Dan Esco said it would be OK to push for an extension in good faith, however, "at the same time, based on what I've heard, it doesn't sound promising in terms of the business proposal and meeting MDAR's requirements based on the use that was communicated by the attorney here. ...
 
"So, I'd be inclined to support letting them exercise their right of first refusal and just proceed with the sale to MDAR."
 
MDAR will buy the land from the town and then put it out to bid so that it can be sold to someone who intends on using it for agricultural use, Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
"[MDAR] said that they would buy [the land.] That they would exercise their right and, what they say is, if they don't exercise that right, that they lose it," Klein said.
 
"And therefore the town could sell it to whoever they want to with no farm plan in place, although the property would still be subject to the APR. So, it sounds like they intend to purchase it." 
 
Background: 
 
The 148 acres of land made up of three parcels came into the town's possession in 2016 in a taking for delinquent taxes. The town had first placed a lien against the property in 2009.
 
However, there's a fourth parcel still owned by the Bardin estate in Windsor and an APR that covers all four contiguous pieces of the farm that would seem to prevent Dalton from selling its portion.
 
This issue was apparently not brought up in land court when the town took the land.
 
MDAR paid the late James Edgar Bardin $260,000 in 1991 to place an APR on his farm. The agreement also gives the state the right of first refusal if the land is to be sold. A waiver from MDAR would be required for a sale to any other entity.

Tags: agricultural restriction,   land sales,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Hopes for Continued Talks on Mall Sale

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is optimistic that talks for the Berkshire Mall sale will continue. 
 
Chair Deborah Maynard and Vice Chair Juli Baker were to meet with mall owner JMJ Holdings, the Baker Hill Road District, and proposed buyer Cypress Equities on Tuesday to discuss next steps. As of Wednesday, iBerkshires had received a "we are optimistic" from Maynard on the talks. The Berkshire Eagle reported a response from a Cypress representative saying talks will continue.  
 
Baker had updated the Select Board on Monday about the status of the sale and the efforts being undertaken by the renamed Baker Hill Business District.
 
Cypress Equities pulled out of a purchase-and sale-agreement with mall owner JMJ last week for the following reasons. 
  • Not enough water service/pressure to the property to support redevelopment without constructing costly water tanks.
  • The current septic system and former treatment facility is not acceptable for a project of the scale and magnitude proposed.
  • There is existing asbestos and bad soil from the treatment system that needs to be remediated off site.
  • And the current structure and tax assessment of the Baker Hill Road District.
Baker has been working with what is now being called the Baker Hill Business District and said she and the district members are happy that Cypress has decided to leave the door open to more discussions and that they have been working hard to try and address the company's needs.
 
Last month, the town had asked state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III to support the state Department of Transportation taking over the Connector Road, funding for a mall connection to Pittsfield's wastewater treatment plant and a connection to the town's water main.
 
Baker said an amendment has been drafted to cap the district's taxes to not grow more than 2.5 percent a year. She noted that, historically, taxes have not grown by more than one percent per year, so it won't be difficult to meet that cap.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories