image description

Dalton Water Board Approves Participation in EMS Regionalization Study

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Board of Water Commissioners agreed at its recent meeting to participate in a  Central Berkshire and Hill Towns Emergency Medical Services regionalization study.
 
The study would provide information and be a "very helpful guide" to the future of EMS services and would not commit the district to any future changes, resident Dr. Thomas Irwin said during several meetings. 
 
Irwin explained that there is a push statewide to support regionalization of EMS services because having separate full-blown EMS services in each town is not financially viable. 
 
The study will be sponsored by the town of Hinsdale, as the state does not recognize the Dalton Fire District for grant purposes.
 
With this approval, the University of Massachusetts' Collins Center will apply for the state grant, and if awarded, the center will coordinate the study.  If approved for the grant, the study would likely start during fiscal year 2026, Irwin said in a follow-up. 
 
The study would include the bordering towns of Savoy, Dalton, Hinsdale and Peru. 
 
Windsor was also asked if it wanted to participate in the study but opted out because it was already involved in a separate study with Amherst College. 
 
Windsor didn't want to "confuse the picture by being involved in two studies at the same time," Irwin had told the board previously. 
 
Although Windsor is not part of the study, its call data and dispatch data are available through Dalton's dispatch.
 
The Hampshire County town of Middlefield was also going to be included, but its fire chief decided not to sign the letter of participation despite heavily relying on bordering towns for its EMS services, resident Don Davis explained. 
 
Irwin could not attend the meeting so Davis stepped in to present the study to the board again. 
 
Middlefield does not have an ambulance service and relies on Dalton and Hinsdale to help meet that need. 
 
Dalton Fire Department made six calls to Middlefield last year, which is a large chunk of its total calls.
 
Background: 
 
Irwin presented the study to the board during its meeting in October, but the item was not on the agenda, so a decision could not be made then.  
 
The board delayed the decision again at the end of October until they could receive input from its chair, James Driscoll, who was out of town and could not attend the meeting.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

SJC Dismisses Pittsfield Cell Tower Suit

Staff reportsiBerkshires
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Supreme Judicial Court has affirmed a lower court's order to dismiss a lawsuit over the cell tower on South Street. 
 
The court's opinion, released Thursday, found that the city had no authority to pre-empt federal legislation, specifically the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.
 
The finding comes four years after the Board of Health issued — and then rescinded — an order for Verizon to cease the tower's operations. 
 
Six residents in the Shacktown neighborhood have been fighting Verizon over the construction of the tower and the purported health issues they've suffered from the radio frequencies emanating from it. They first sought a ruling against the Zoning Board of Appeals over the notification process, which was dismissed. 
 
They sought relief through the Board of Health, which discussed the problem for nearly a year before issuing a cease and desist to Verizon in 2022 if it did not respond to a show-cause hearing about the effects of RF radiation within seven days. Verizon, operating as Pittsfield Cellular Telephone, asked for a declaratory judgment from the U.S. District Court in Springfield against the city. 
 
The Health Board, citing fears of litigation, withdrew the order and the residents, in turn, sued the city for failing to protect them. 
 
The case was first heard in Superior Court on July 28, 2022, which dismissed the suit based on pre-emption of federal laws. The plaintiffs appealed and the Supreme Judicial Court, on its own initiative, transferred the case from the Appeals Court.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories