EPA Extends Deadline for Evaluating PCB Reduction Proposals at GE/Housatonic Site

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the extension of the deadline to evaluate proposals received for the Reducing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Concentrations and/or Toxicity in Soil and Sediment at the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site Challenge due to the number of proposals submitted.
 
A total of 98 solutions were received from 40 countries, including the United States, Brazil, Canada, Columbia, Jamaica, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Russia, Czechia, Switzerland, Egypt, Israel, Greece, Spain, Morocco, Romania, Bulgaria, Nigeria, Algeria, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Oman, Kenya, South Africa, Rwanda, India, China, Bangladesh, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Australia, and Japan.
 
The judging panel, which does not include the EPA Site Case Team, is moving 48 solutions forward. Solution quality was determined by Wazoku, a national contractor who implements Challenges for the Federal Government. Due to the number of responses from contributors and to provide adequate review time by the judging panel, the Challenge judging period is being extended to Feb. 10, 2025.
 
The EPA launched the Reducing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Concentrations and/or Toxicity in Soil and Sediment at the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site Challenge in September 2024. In the 2020 Settlement Agreement EPA agreed to "facilitate opportunities for research and testing of innovative treatment and other technologies and approaches for reducing PCB toxicity and/or concentrations in excavated soil and/or sediment before, during, or after disposal in a landfill."
 
An inexpensive and efficient method for reducing PCB concentrations and/or toxicity in soil and sediment could greatly benefit cleanups of all PCB contaminated sites.
 
The Challenge was posted for approximately 60 days and initially involved a 30-day evaluation period, originally ending on December 12, 2024.
 
The entries are evaluated by a panel of judges comprised of both federal representatives, academia, and private community member(s). The best solutions in this Prize Challenge could win an award of $30,000 for meeting all solution requirements.
 
The initial phase, Phase 1, of this Challenge is the ideation phase. If Phase 1 of the Challenge successfully identifies a vendor (or vendors) who have proposed promising and practical solutions, then those vendors would be selected as winners of Phase 1 of the Challenge. EPA may then proceed to Phase 2, the proof-of-concept phase. The proof-of-concept Phase would likely include a pilot or bench scale testing of the technology. 
 
Although funded by EPA Region 1, the EPA Case Team for the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site will not participate in the Challenge process or the judging of submitted entries.
 
EPA supports the use and implementation of applicable technologies to reduce PCB concentrations and toxicity. If both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Challenge successfully identify a cost-effective solution that will make a real difference in the cleanup, EPA Region 1 commits to considering the applicability of the solution to the cleanup potentially through the Final Permit's adaptive management provisions or other Permit/Consent Decree provisions.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Families Frustrated Over Unreleased PHS Report, Herberg Slur Incident

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Parents are expressing their frustration with hate speech, bullying, and staff misconduct, which they said happens in Pittsfield schools. 

Community members and some elected officials have consistently advocated for the release of the redacted Pittsfield High School investigation report, and a teacher being placed on leave for allegedly repeating racist and homophobic slurs sparked a community conversation about how Pittsfield Public Schools can address injustices. 

The district's human resources director detailed the investigation processes during last week's School Committee meeting.

"People are angry. They feel like when they spoke up about Morningside School, it was closed anyway. They feel like they speak up about the PHS report, and that's just kind of getting shoved under the rug," resident Brenda Coddington said during public comment.

"I mean, when do people who actually voted for all of you, by the way, when does their voice and opinion count and matter? Because you can sit up here all day long and say that it does, but your actions, or rather lack of action, speak volumes."

Last month, School Committee member Ciara Batory demanded a date for the 2025 report's release to the public.

Three administrators and two teachers, past and present, were investigated by Bulkley Richardson and Gelinas LLP for a range of allegations that surfaced or re-surfaced at the end of 2024 after Pittsfield High's former dean of students was arrested and charged by the U.S. Attorney's Office for allegedly conspiring to traffic large quantities of cocaine in Western Massachusetts.

Executive summaries were released that concluded the claims of inappropriate conduct between teachers and students were "unsupported." Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody countered one of the unsupported determinations, writing on Facebook last week that she knows one person can conclude with confidence and a court case that pictures of the staff member's genitalia was sent to minors. 

"During this investigation, we sought to determine the validity of allegations about PHS Administrator #2 sharing a photograph of female genitalia with PHS students on her Snapchat account," the final executive summary reads. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories