EPA Extends Deadline for Evaluating PCB Reduction Proposals at GE/Housatonic Site

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the extension of the deadline to evaluate proposals received for the Reducing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Concentrations and/or Toxicity in Soil and Sediment at the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site Challenge due to the number of proposals submitted.
 
A total of 98 solutions were received from 40 countries, including the United States, Brazil, Canada, Columbia, Jamaica, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Russia, Czechia, Switzerland, Egypt, Israel, Greece, Spain, Morocco, Romania, Bulgaria, Nigeria, Algeria, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Oman, Kenya, South Africa, Rwanda, India, China, Bangladesh, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Australia, and Japan.
 
The judging panel, which does not include the EPA Site Case Team, is moving 48 solutions forward. Solution quality was determined by Wazoku, a national contractor who implements Challenges for the Federal Government. Due to the number of responses from contributors and to provide adequate review time by the judging panel, the Challenge judging period is being extended to Feb. 10, 2025.
 
The EPA launched the Reducing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Concentrations and/or Toxicity in Soil and Sediment at the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site Challenge in September 2024. In the 2020 Settlement Agreement EPA agreed to "facilitate opportunities for research and testing of innovative treatment and other technologies and approaches for reducing PCB toxicity and/or concentrations in excavated soil and/or sediment before, during, or after disposal in a landfill."
 
An inexpensive and efficient method for reducing PCB concentrations and/or toxicity in soil and sediment could greatly benefit cleanups of all PCB contaminated sites.
 
The Challenge was posted for approximately 60 days and initially involved a 30-day evaluation period, originally ending on December 12, 2024.
 
The entries are evaluated by a panel of judges comprised of both federal representatives, academia, and private community member(s). The best solutions in this Prize Challenge could win an award of $30,000 for meeting all solution requirements.
 
The initial phase, Phase 1, of this Challenge is the ideation phase. If Phase 1 of the Challenge successfully identifies a vendor (or vendors) who have proposed promising and practical solutions, then those vendors would be selected as winners of Phase 1 of the Challenge. EPA may then proceed to Phase 2, the proof-of-concept phase. The proof-of-concept Phase would likely include a pilot or bench scale testing of the technology. 
 
Although funded by EPA Region 1, the EPA Case Team for the GE-Pittsfield/Housatonic River Site will not participate in the Challenge process or the judging of submitted entries.
 
EPA supports the use and implementation of applicable technologies to reduce PCB concentrations and toxicity. If both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Challenge successfully identify a cost-effective solution that will make a real difference in the cleanup, EPA Region 1 commits to considering the applicability of the solution to the cleanup potentially through the Final Permit's adaptive management provisions or other Permit/Consent Decree provisions.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Healey Gives Municipalities Say on Data Centers, Pittsfield Eyes Moratorium

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— Last week, Governor Maura Healey signed an executive order that gives municipalities the power to say 'no' to data centers. 

Pittsfield is drafting a moratorium that bans the facilities until more research can be done.  Holyoke became the first in Massachusetts to ban new data centers in July. 

Healey, during a press conference at the State House on Tuesday, Sept. 8, announced that if a data center proposal doesn't have local approval, state permitting agencies will not advance it.  

"Unless a community says yes to a data center, we are saying no," she said. "We're giving communities a voice and laying out the rules for what needs to happen in Massachusetts. I'm also making sure these data centers use clean energy, and that we protect people from higher energy costs – including by returning money directly back to ratepayers."

The city's Community Development Board has agreed to go forward with a data center moratorium.  City Planner Kevin Rayner told the board in July that he has been working with the city solicitor on a proposed document, which said Pittsfield could allow a data center if it is proven self-sufficient with its own power source. 

Rayner is skeptical of the facilities' power and water usage, as well as heat generation. 

"In my opinion, the smart way to go is just to put a wall, moratorium, up and think about it," he said during the board's meeting on July 7. "We can always take the wall down."

Board member Gary Levante agreed. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories