Williamstown Housing Trust Discussing Marketing Plan for Subdivision

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The board of the town's Affordable Housing Trust hopes to resolve in January an issue with the non-profit looking to build four single-family homes on a Summer Street parcel owned by the trust.
 
At their Dec. 17 meeting, the trustees revisited the question of how Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanities will market the homes, which will be built over a period of four years if the local chapter of Habitat for Humanity wins approval from the town.
 
The final regulatory hurdle for Habitat is Development Plan Review for the proposed subdivision by the Planning Board, which is scheduled to address the issue in a public hearing at its Jan. 14 meeting.
 
In August, representatives of NBHFH told the board that the trustees' desire to have homes built on Summer Street count in the commonwealth's Subsidized Housing Inventory was a problem given the Habitat model of picking an initial occupant before a home is built and determining a price at the end of the process.
 
The commonwealth, meanwhile, requires prices to be determined before homes are marketed to prospective buyers.
 
Last week, a working group of the seven-member Affordable Housing Trust board met with representatives from Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity to try to resolve what the non-profit leaders have described as a "mismatch" between the Habitat and state procedures.
 
Trustee Tom Sheldon told his colleagues at the Dec. 17 meeting that he arranged the meeting for Friday, Dec. 19, between a few members of the Trust board and members of the NBHFH board.
 
"There are two pretty clear viewpoints," Sheldon said. "One, the protocols are such that Habitat would have some real difficulties [following the state's rule for the SHI].
 
"[Former AHT board member] Andy Hogeland shared an email that indicated a more affirmative view of getting these houses listed on the state inventory. The purpose of the meeting on Friday is to hear from Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity — [President] Keith Davis and [Board Secretary] Laura Gura — why this is problematic."
 
Following Wednesday's meeting of the trust board, Sheldon clarified to iBerkshires.com that the email from Hogeland went to three members of the current board.
 
At the meeting, telecast on the town's community access television station, Willinet, the board agreed that Sheldon and Ruth Harrison would represent the town panel in the meeting.
 
Cheryl Shanks, who wouldn't be attending the Friday meeting, had a request for those who would.
 
"I hope from the meeting, it will be possible to get a sense of … where it is that Habitat can be flexible when it comes to the way they advertise for people or get people to do the sweat equity, the timing of all that," Shanks said. "Where are their negotiation points? I have not sense that there are any from them, but I don't know that there aren't."
 
In other business at the Affordable Housing Trust's December meeting, the trustees discussed putting together an application for Community Preservation Act funds for the fiscal year 2026 cycle. 
 
The Community Preservation Committee, which vets applications and makes recommendations to the annual town meeting for approval, has set a Jan. 22 deadline for FY26 applications.

Tags: affordable housing trust,   habitat for humanity,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Takes Another Look at FY27 Budget

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock School Committee on Tuesday decided to bring a fiscal year 2027 budget to Thursday's public hearing that maintains level services while seeking double-digit percentage increases in the assessments to each of the district's member towns.
 
The committee knew those increases were coming from a draft budget it saw at its March 3 meeting, but the numbers changed over the last couple of weeks — driving up the anticipated assessment to Williamstown and leading to a slight reduction for the budget hit to Lanesborough.
 
The draft budget in front of the committee on Tuesday includes a 13.61 percent increase in the district's assessment to Williamstown and a 10.99 percent hike for Lanesborough.
 
In real dollars, those assessment increases translate to $2,018,000 and $751,000, respectively versus the FY26 assessment to pay for the current school year.
 
Williamstown's assessment is up 0.9 percent from March 3 to March 14 while Lanesborough's is down 0.8 percent, in part because, per the regional agreement, each town pays the operating cost of its elementary school (and splits the cost of the middle-high school based on enrollment). Some of the increased cost in the last two weeks impacts Williamstown Elementary more than Lanesborough Elementary.
 
Tuesday's draft is likely to be relatively unchanged when the School Committee holds its annual public hearing on the budget on Thursday, the same night the committee likely will vote on the final FY27 budget — and resulting assessments — it will send to each member town's annual town meeting in the spring.
 
Superintendent Joseph Bergeron told the committee that the administration and the elected body's Finance subcommittee had been making modest progress on mitigating the assessment increases to both member towns before the district received two gut punches.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories