Cheshire Prepares Fiscal 2026 Budget

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
CHESHIRE, Mass. — The Select Board and Finance Committee held a joint meeting last week to discuss the projected budget for fiscal year 2026, which is forecast to increase by about 4.5 percent. 
 
At the time of last week's meeting, the projected operating budget was $7,940,146. However, this will fluctuate during the budgeting process, said Jennifer Morse, town administrator, this week.
 
The driving forces for these increase include hikes in insurance, the school budget, and salaries. 
 
At the time of the joint meeting, active insurance was expecting an increase of $36,136 or 13.6 percent, which would total $301,872. 
 
Cheshire's appropriation for the school budget is $2,996,643, a 3.623 percent increase or $104,773. More information here
 
The board discussed the school budget, with one member expressing their disappointment and feeling that the School Committee didn't do the detailed diligence they were hoping for.
 
The board member said the committee was asked questions that town officials had asked them previously, but they could not be answered. 
 
"So, I'm not sure how they're going about their review. They've already signed off on it," the board member said. 
 
The committee has been more transparent in the fact that Superintendent Aaron Dean has communicated with the board chairs about what the expected budget increases are and what hurdles they have to overcome, including the cost of health insurance and out-of-district special education tuitions. 
 
"If they level funded everything with just those two increases, it was looking like a 10 percent increase. So, they did do work to reduce," the board member said, adding that he still would have liked for the committee to do a "deep dive" line by line to understand what every budget item is. 
 
The McCann Technical School assessment is $586,213, up $38,783, or about 7 percent, over this year. 
 
The other cause for the increase in the town's operating budget is salaries for several positions.
 
The town had done a salary survey, which demonstrated the need to increase salaries for some departments to make it equal to other towns, Morse said. 
 
During the joint meeting, the board and committee discussed ways to reduce costs, including adjusting budgets that no longer align with existing responsibilities.
 
It was highlighted how the Board of Health has the largest stipends but is not doing as much anymore. 
 
"I vividly remember an argument being made to double the electrical inspector because of all the solar projects, and we don't have solar projects that frequently anymore," one member said. 
 
The Board of Health still has other responsibilities, including inspection and enforcement for food, housing inspections, septic and Title 5, and tobacco establishments. It meets once a month.
 
It was raised whether the town should increase its legal budget because this year, the town is getting close to its budgeted amount.
 
The legal account has about $3,000 left, Morse said. 
 
The one case that is in litigation and is "sucking up a lot of the money" should be winding down, she said. 
 
One member asked if there is money set aside for court fees for condemned homes, which there is not. However, this could be re-examined once the need arises, Morse said. 
 
A board member said the town is anticipating this to come up next year and should consider adding funds now to prepare.

Tags: cheshire_budget,   fiscal 2026,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.

The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.

Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.

These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.

This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.

For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.

I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.

Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories