image description
The public session at the Senior Center was attended by Fire Chief Thomas Sammons and Commissioner of Public Works Ricardo Morales, seen above helping attendees with phone questionaire.

Pittsfield Talks Hazard Mitigation

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city's updated Hazard Mitigation Plan is headed towards final review.

On Monday, community members and public officials mulled disaster preparedness at the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center.  Pittsfield's 2019 plan is due for an update so the city stays eligible for grant funding and, of course, prepared.

"Mitigation planning is the foundation for establishing where the city would like to direct its risk reduction efforts, how it would like to build community resilience through the whole breadth of natural hazard events that it is at risk to. It brings people together and organizations to develop strategies, to build ideas for projects, to do things through, say, plans or regulations, outreach activities, and so on," said Darrin Punchard of Jamie Caplan Consulting.

"These hazard mitigation plans, 25 years ago, became a requirement for cities and towns across the United States in order to be eligible for certain grant programs."

Pittsfield recently partnered with Berkshire Medical Center for a nearly $2 million Hazard Mitigation Grant toward backup generators at the hospital.  

"These are key grant funding programs that have come through the federal government, but in order to access and be eligible for that type of funding, you have to prepare these plans and update them every five years," Punchard explained.

"So that's the purpose of this plan document is really to build community resilience, but also, very importantly, maintain grant funding eligibility for the city."

The Hazard Mitigation Plan, last updated in 2019, focuses the city's limited resources on areas of greatest risk, helps build partnerships with organizations outside of the city, and increases public awareness. Punchard added that the plan can also align with other city objectives, but "saving lives and money, that's the main focus, of course, of hazard mitigation."

Also in 2019, the city went through a Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness, or MVP, process that heavily focused on risks posed by climate change.


Pittsfield began working with the firm (which facilitated the existing plan) last fall, and Monday's public hearing was the second. In a few weeks, a draft plan will be posted for public input before a final plan goes to the state and Federal Emergency Management Agency for approval.

The plan's six goals relate to saving lives and property, high hazard potential dams, local plans and regulations, building and infrastructure projects, natural and cultural resources, and education.  The risk assessment process and the hazard mitigation strategy are the meat and bones of the document.

Flooding from precipitation, severe winter storms, wildfires, and temperatures were identified as the city's highest risk hazards, while earthquakes and landslides are the lowest risk. This was mirrored in responses from attendees, who expressed concern about winter storms, flooding, and power outages.

"There's nothing we can really do to stop them from occurring or limit their intensity as a natural event but what we can do is limit the risk, its impacts on our community assets, on people, on our built in environment, our infrastructure and critical facilities, our natural environment, and the economy," Punchard said.

Risk is the potential for damage, losses, or other impacts created by the interaction of natural hazards such as hurricanes, earthquakes, and wildfires with community assets. The plan looks at 11 natural hazard categories and identifies critical facilities such as fire and police stations, utility lifelines, and schools that serve as emergency shelters.

"There's a whole chapter dedicated to risk assessment, so you'll find a profile for each of those 11 natural hazards identified in the plan, what potential impacts are, and again, how they were all prioritized against one another," Punchard explained.

"There's a capability assessment. This is an aspect of the plan I was heavily involved in, which was really looking at the city's existing plans and regulations, and looking across departments of all those great things that the city is already doing to help mitigate risk, and where there are opportunities to do perhaps more and build those capabilities and resources at the city level."

The presentation included information about individual preparedness and emergency planning "because it's not all up to the chief and emergency management and first responders, of course, to help us must be more reliant," he added.

"There's a lot we can do at the individual, home level, neighborhood level, as well as citywide."


Tags: hazard mitigation,   mvp,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories