image description
Illustration of a proposed $7.3 million public safety building being proposed by the Select Board.

Lanesborough Advancing Combined Police/EMS Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Town officials will again propose a combined police and EMS facility to voters. This time, for a couple of million dollars more.

On Monday, the Select Board voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build. The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

"We can't go to a town meeting and give them two options," said Selectman Timothy Sorrell, the town's former police chief.

"We have to decide, I'm ready tonight to make a motion on what I think is the best decision."

Members agreed that this option has stood the test of time and makes the most sense. Selectwoman Deborah Maynard noted it was a tough decision to make as a person on a fixed income, "but it's something that we need."

"I ran for Select Board in 2020 because I couldn't believe this town made our Police Department work in such a decrepit building for years," Chair Michael Murphy said.

"That bothered me enough that I finally chose to run."

The 7,222 square-foot combined police and EMS build would cost about $7,365,868. A 4,814-square-foot police station with a separate two or three-bay EMS facility would be $6,509,900, but the Select Board was advised that it might not be worth the money.

"The Lanesborough ambulance clearly needs a place that meets their needs. The Police Department, while temporarily situated in a rented facility, clearly needs a place that meets their needs. The committee's work clearly shows that residents support a combined police and ambulance, public safety facility," Public Safety Building Committee member Lisa Dachinger said.



She understands that funding a major project like this raises concerns about its impact on property taxes, recognizing that "no one at this moment can say with any certainty exactly what this project will cost and what the actual out-of-pocket expenses to our taxpayers will be when it is finished."

Dachinger strongly believes that if residents are offered the opportunity to vote on a Proposition 2.5 debt exclusion, the town will have a "yes" or "no" answer on funding the project.  

"If the vote is 'yes,' it will allow the town to continue to move forward and get a better handle on how much it might cost," she said.

"…If the vote is 'no,' that will be the end of it. I urge you not to kick the can down the road, but instead to empower our residents now to have a say in ensuring our town's public safety department needs are met in a fiscally responsible way by employing a Proposition 2.5 debt exclusion for a public safety complex facility."

Similarly, committee Chair Mark Siegars feels the joint facility is "probably the best." Also the chair of the Council on Aging, he reported that many of the town's seniors have higher incomes, and they should not be used as an excuse not to do the right thing.

"This idea that we're impacting fixed income people and seniors, Lanesborough has never qualified for any public assistance because our standard of living, average household income in Lanesborough, is pretty high for Berkshire County," he said.

Legal counsel will be consulted about pushing the Proposition 2.5 debt exclusion vote to a special town meeting. A "yes" vote would allow the question to be put on the town's ballot.

"Good luck to us all,"  Murphy said.


Tags: police station,   public safety buildings,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Nearly 5% Budget Increase Proposed For Pittsfield

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city's operating budget and water/sewer rates are on Tuesday's City Council meeting agenda.

Mayor Peter Marchetti has submitted an order to raise and appropriate $226,246,942 for the fiscal year 2026 budget, a nearly 4.8 percent increase from the previous year. It includes $86,450,361 for the school department, $11,202,345 for the department of public services, and $15,468,750 for the Pittsfield police.

Marchetti has also asked that $2 million in free cash be applied to offset the FY26 tax rate.

While these items are on the agenda for Tuesday, they are typically referred to the Committee of the Whole, and departments are deliberated on a case-by-case basis.

The city has proposed a 7 percent water rate increase and a 6 percent sewer rate increase based on a 4.40 percent Consumer Price Index Factor. The water rate is based on a 2.60 percent Operational Stability Factor, and the sewer rate on a 1.60 percent OSF.

This would raise the typical two-bathroom house's bill about $70 annually, from $1,097 per year to $1,168 per year. For the average metered four-member household, it will raise less than $50 from about $734 to $781 per year.

"The rate changes proposed support the budget for the Water and Sewer Enterprise Funds and fund increases in salaries and expenses for Utilities system operations, debt service for capital projects, and the build-up of Retained Earnings," Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales wrote.

Last year, Marchetti proposed a formula-based approach for water/sewer rates that aims to fairly adjust rates yearly using the Consumer Price Index Factor (CPIF) and the Operational Stability Factor (OSF).

The CPIF is a way to adjust for inflation or deflation and is calculated by comparing the year-over-year change in February of the CPI index for water and sewer, the administration says, and the OSF aims at ensuring enough funding for future capital upgrades, maintenance, and unexpected challenges with a ten percent cap. The council voted to change that to an 8 percent cap, as motioned by Councilor at Large Earl Persip III.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories