Problematic Pittsfield Intersection Gets Flashing Stop Signs

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. —  Flashing stop signs were added to the problematic Onota Street intersection as a cost-effective way to reduce crashes. 

The three-way stop is where Onota and Linden Streets intersect, and those traveling west on Linden Street are on an incline. The intersection is well-traveled and has two active businesses on it. 

"We've all wanted it for a long time. It's good news," Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said at last week's City Council meeting. 

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales told councilors that the upgraded signs were installed. They are similar to standard stop signs but have flashing lights and a solar panel. 

"I agree that improvements are needed at this intersection and have already begun the procurement process to upgrade the three existing stop signs with flashing LED stop signs," he wrote in a communication to the council on Aug. 12. 

"This measure directly addresses the concerns raised and represents a timely and cost-effective step toward enhancing safety at this intersection." 

In June, Lampiasi requested that the signs be "immediately" upgraded to flashing LED stop signs on all approaches. She was glad to see they were installed and feels it will improve travel for the community. 

"The residents who live there are excited. People who pass through the area are going to have a better commute," she said. 

A couple of years ago, former councilor Karen Kalinowsky petitioned to install a blinking red light or other traffic light configuration at the intersection, but it was tabled because the city already had plans to address the area. 


There was some reconfiguration of the stop bar and curbs to improve visibility. 

Lampiasi's request follows an accident at the intersection on June 7. The Berkshire Eagle reported that a person was transported to Berkshire Medical Center after a two-car collision at the intersection between a truck and a sedan. 

She explained that this underscores "long-standing issues with driver non-compliance and limited visibility" and that residents are directly affected by inaction. 

"The current signage does not adequately capture drivers' attention - creating unsafe conditions for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists," Lampiasi wrote. 

"Those who live in this neighborhood and commute through it daily have repeatedly raised concerns about safety at this intersection while patiently waiting department lead intervention." 

The council also approved the use of an upgraded voting machine in time for the upcoming municipal election. It is an Image Cast Precinct Tabulator 2 System that is 70 percent faster. 

Clerk Michele Benjamin assured voters that they won"t see a difference at the polls, explaining, "It's basically the same."  They have multi-factor identification, an audit trail, and a 3-5 second scan time. 

"I think it's long overdue," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"We want our ballot system to be safe, secure, and in this case, I think the newer technology is going to make everybody's experience better." 


Tags: traffic signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Counter Sues Berkshire Concrete

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — The dispute between Berkshire Concrete and the town has taken another turn as the town pursues a countersuit against the excavation company.
 
On April 13, Berkshire Concrete Corp., a subsidiary of Petricca Industries, launched legal action against the town, seeking damages, the overturning of the Planning Board's denial of its special permit, and additional proposed orders of a court. 
 
The town has responded with a countersuit of its own, seeking a preliminary injunction requiring Berkshire Concrete to fully restore Lot 105-16 and a permanent injunction mandating an effective dust mitigation plan. 
 
The suit also requests that Berkshire Concrete pay all fines assessed against them, along with the town’s legal costs and attorney's fees, and other relief deemed by the court. 
 
The claim explains the timeline of events dating back to 2024 when Berkshire Concrete started mining without town approval on parcel 105-16, clearing trees and vegetation that abuttors claimed acted as a natural barrier. 
 
The removal of this vegetation resulted in the creation of a corridor for wind to carry dust from the lot and onto residential properties in the abutting neighborhood, the suit claims. 
 
Almost a year ago, both the Select Board and Planning Board expressed that they wanted parcel No. 105-16 fully mitigated to abide by the town's bylaws.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories