Problematic Pittsfield Intersection Gets Flashing Stop Signs

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. —  Flashing stop signs were added to the problematic Onota Street intersection as a cost-effective way to reduce crashes. 

The three-way stop is where Onota and Linden Streets intersect, and those traveling west on Linden Street are on an incline. The intersection is well-traveled and has two active businesses on it. 

"We've all wanted it for a long time. It's good news," Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said at last week's City Council meeting. 

Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales told councilors that the upgraded signs were installed. They are similar to standard stop signs but have flashing lights and a solar panel. 

"I agree that improvements are needed at this intersection and have already begun the procurement process to upgrade the three existing stop signs with flashing LED stop signs," he wrote in a communication to the council on Aug. 12. 

"This measure directly addresses the concerns raised and represents a timely and cost-effective step toward enhancing safety at this intersection." 

In June, Lampiasi requested that the signs be "immediately" upgraded to flashing LED stop signs on all approaches. She was glad to see they were installed and feels it will improve travel for the community. 

"The residents who live there are excited. People who pass through the area are going to have a better commute," she said. 

A couple of years ago, former councilor Karen Kalinowsky petitioned to install a blinking red light or other traffic light configuration at the intersection, but it was tabled because the city already had plans to address the area. 


There was some reconfiguration of the stop bar and curbs to improve visibility. 

Lampiasi's request follows an accident at the intersection on June 7. The Berkshire Eagle reported that a person was transported to Berkshire Medical Center after a two-car collision at the intersection between a truck and a sedan. 

She explained that this underscores "long-standing issues with driver non-compliance and limited visibility" and that residents are directly affected by inaction. 

"The current signage does not adequately capture drivers' attention - creating unsafe conditions for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists," Lampiasi wrote. 

"Those who live in this neighborhood and commute through it daily have repeatedly raised concerns about safety at this intersection while patiently waiting department lead intervention." 

The council also approved the use of an upgraded voting machine in time for the upcoming municipal election. It is an Image Cast Precinct Tabulator 2 System that is 70 percent faster. 

Clerk Michele Benjamin assured voters that they won"t see a difference at the polls, explaining, "It's basically the same."  They have multi-factor identification, an audit trail, and a 3-5 second scan time. 

"I think it's long overdue," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"We want our ballot system to be safe, secure, and in this case, I think the newer technology is going to make everybody's experience better." 


Tags: traffic signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Schools Consider Enhanced Bus Surveillance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The Pittsfield Public Schools are considering a couple of companies for enhanced bus safety surveillance after a spring pilot. 

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Bonnie Howland reported that they have met with BusPatrol and Gatekeeper Systems, which offer automated stop-arm enforcement and video surveillance.

It is illegal for drivers to pass a school bus when the red warning lights are flashing, and the stop-sign arm is extended.  This protects children exiting and entering the school bus. 

A stop-arm camera pilot program was conducted in May. 

"We currently have a four-camera system on the interior of the bus, so Gatekeeper is sort of better as far as functionality. It's a little more of an upfront investment," Howland told the School Committee last week. 

"BusPatrol works where you basically have an installation of the cameras, and then as tickets are issued to people, you sort of regain your investment, so it's two different sort of cost profiles."

Gatekeeper would cost about $100,000 to purchase, while BusPatrol has no upfront cost and a monthly charge. 

PPS is interested in putting cameras in all of its buses, about 30.  Howland said that Gatekeeper has a little more robust system that fits into our current system, and Mayor Peter Marchetti reported that the company with no upfront cost helps secure a grant for implementation: $1,200 per camera and $250 a month per bus. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories