Williamstown Health Board Talks Smoking at Senior Apartments

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Board of Health on Tuesday discussed how to address reports of smoking inside the senior apartments at Proprietor's Field and Highland Woods.
 
Health Inspector Ruth Russell asked the board how she should handle the complaints she has received in light of the fact that the town bylaw against smoking in multifamily housing remains in legal limbo.
 
The town does have a bylaw already on the books about smoking in workplaces, Russell noted, and it is arguable that the age-restricted housing complexes fall under that provision.
 
"I was hesitant to call it a work place," Russell said. "But there are maintenance workers in and out of there constantly, and someone pointed out that home health-care workers are coming in and out doing their job.
 
"I was wondering if I could get your opinion on whether that is the right use of this [workplace] bylaw or not."
 
The question would become moot if the Attorney General's Office signs off on a bylaw passed by May's annual town meeting banning smoking in multifamily dwellings with more than four units. Proprietor's Field and Highland Woods both would fall under the new bylaw if it is approved by the commonwealth, which has asked for more time than customarily is needed for review of town meeting actions.
 
Board of Health Chair Devan Bartels asked Russell to clarify that the complaints she was receiving came from residents and not on-site employees, and Russell said that was the case.
 
"I verbally asked a couple of employees when I was doing my pre-inspections there," Russell said. "The worker or two I talked to said they were bothered by [the smoke], but they're not bringing the complaints."
 
Bartels suggested that Russell contact the employers of workers who are inside the buildings in question on a regular basis to see if they have an issue.
 
"It is a residence, but it is their work place when they're there," said Bartels, a physician. "I'm not a lawyer, but that's my read of the situation."
 
Bartels added that the regulatory path might be through the property manager, in this case Hearthway of Pittsfield.
 
"Until the smoking ban in non-public housing goes into effect, we really can't do much," Bartels said.
 
Russell also updated the board on efforts to resolve the failed well that serves the '6 House Pub on Cold Spring Road (Route 7).
 
The restaurant has been under a boil water order since December 2023. Earlier this year, the board heard that the owner of the restaurant and motel, which has property on the east and west side of the road, had approval to dig a new well on the west side and was looking to pipe water underneath the highway to serve its motel units and restaurant on the east side.
 
"I got an update yesterday [from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection]," Russell said. "The gist is they are no longer digging one singular well across the street [from the restaurant] to serve all facilities. They are going for treatment on all three wells.
 
"If all three well treatments work and get approved, the boil water order will be lifted for the 910 Cold Spring Road property."
 
Russell said there was no indication from DEP why the plan had changed.
 
"I wonder if it's the difficulty of getting under the road," she said. "I don't know how expensive that is. I don't know if it was a financial decision or more research was done. … I hope this at least starts moving. I'd like to see some progress."
 
The good news is that the restaurant continues to operate under the boil water order.
 
"My last inspection, it looked good in there," Russell said. "I came in, and they were boiling in huge vats. All the soda machines were shut down, and they were using bottled soda. It's good to see the consistency. It's got to be difficult and expensive."
 
Russell told the board that the '6 House Pub is receiving more frequent inspections in addition to the twice yearly visits required by state law.
 
In other business on Tuesday, the Board of Health received an update from Wendy McWeeny and Marzio Gusmaroli about planning for a townwide health needs assessment. McWeeny shared the outcome of a meeting with Williams College's chair of public health and coordinator of experiential education about working with college students this spring to see what data already exists and develop a survey for residents about public health needs.
 
The project could be continued over the summer and into the fall as data is collected, analyzed and used to formulate a strategic plan, McWeeny said.

Tags: board of health,   drinking water,   smoking regulations,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Moving Superintendent Evaluation to Fall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass.—The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee this month discussed moving its evaluation of the superintendent from the spring to the fall starting in 2027.
 
Chair Julia Bowen brought the idea to the table as part of her proposed calendar for the committee's work during the 2026-27 academic year, saying that a move to the autumn will allow the committee to factor data from the preceding year into its evaluation.
 
"To the extent that [Superintendent Joseph Bergeron's] goals are tied to school performance and, specifically, MCAS [scores], we don't get that or other end of school year summative information until the fall," Bowen said. "Many schools I've worked with and know of actually moved their school leader evaluation to the fall so they can take advantage of all the data that's actually available, rather than doing it in the June time frame.
 
"The other point on that is, as it is, we otherwise vote for Joe's goals in September/October and evaluate him in May, and that's not a year. If we can do it fall to fall, we actually get a full year of work from when we agree on the goals."
 
The committee's most experienced member, Carolyn Greene, raised a concern about breaking with the practice of completing the evaluation process in May and June.
 
"It feels natural to evaluate a superintendent at the close of a school year, not the beginning of a school year," Greene said. "We're still in it in May and June. We're still in it in terms of our mindsets. Sometimes we don't meet in July. We come back in August and do a ‘retreat.' We're now meant to hit the ground running with an evaluation in September based on the work of the previous school year. And the reason is we don't get all the data from the previous school year until September.
 
"The rhythm is off for me. But it could just be that I'm so used to the previous rhythm. I don't want to oppose it. I just do have some reservations about it."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories