image description

Dalton Public Safety Advisory Committee Down to 3

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Public Safety Advisory Committee is down to three members. 
 
The five-member committee was established last June to examine all the options for a new police station or combined public safety facility, with the goal to have a recommendation to the Select Board by this December. 
 
The committee was established after Police Chief Deanna Strout demonstrated to the board the dire condition of the facility that is unable to meet state requirements. The condition of the facility has been worsening as the town explores its options. 
 
During a recent Select Board meeting, the deadline was pushed to April, following recent confusion on next steps. 
 
Craig Wilbur, former co-chair, put in his letter of resignation from the committee effective Dec. 31 and Anthony "Tony" Pagliarulo stepped down after being elected to the Select Board. 
 
During the last meeting, Wilbur stepped down from his role as co-chair following a heated discussion on next steps.
 
"As you know, during last evening's meeting the committee voted to extend its charge for an additional four months. While I fully respect and support the important work that lies ahead, I regret that due to other professional and personal commitments, I am unable to continue serving during this extended period," Wilbur said in his letter. 
 
"If the committee was to remain committed to a holistic report issued this month, I would absolutely help to see this through, however after last evening's meeting, I do not believe that is possible." 
 
The committee decided to have its consultant Brian Humes of Jacunski Humes Architects LLC of Berlin, Conn., conduct a feasibility assessment of the existing space in the basement of Town Hall. 
 
The report on the current facility will detail the requirements for bringing it up to code, identify what may be lost in a renovation compared to a new build, and outline necessary additions during renovation.
 
 
"It has been an honor to contribute to the committee's efforts and to work alongside such dedicated members in advancing public safety for our community. However, I do wish to note my concern that the committee's lack of interest in pursuing options beyond the construction of a new building is, in my view, somewhat myopic," Wilbur said in his resignation.
 
"This narrow focus does not fully offer the town the range of alternatives it deserves to consider in addressing public safety needs.
 
"I am grateful for the opportunity to have participated in these discussions and initiatives, and I remain confident that the Committee will continue to make meaningful progress in the months ahead." 
 
During previous meetings, Strout strongly questioned why the committee is considering exploring other options aside from a new facility, because there isn't enough space at the current facility to provide what the department "legally needs." 
 
Humes had toured the facility and created a space needs assessment which is not in alignment with the basement's existing conditions. 
 
Despite these concerns from the chief, the committee did vote in favor of having Humes do a report on the current facility in addition to the renderings of both a one-story and a two-story. 
 
Some members believed that having Humes do all three evaluations will provide voters the information they need to make an informed decision. 
 
During a Select Board meeting in November, the Select Board also approved crafting a request for proposals for a public safety facility site, to solicit potential private property sites for the proposed police station. 
 
The committee looked at several properties during this process, with four being ranked for the proposed police facility. 
 
Because of the high costs associated with purchasing the land and the discord surrounding the use of Senior Center land it might be advantageous to open the search up again, Pagliarulo said during a previous committee meeting. 

Tags: police station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories