Letter: Rate Filing by Berkshire Gas Company

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

This is a testimonial letter submitted to the Public Utilities Commission:

Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities
Re: D.P.U. 25-170 – Rate Filing by The Berkshire Gas Company

To the Commissioners:

I write in unequivocal opposition to the rate increase proposed in D.P.U. 25-170 and, specifically, to challenge the excessive and unjustified return on equity (ROE) and capital structure assumptions embedded in this filing.

At its core, this case is not simply about infrastructure or cost recovery. It is about how much profit Berkshire Gas expects Massachusetts ratepayers to guarantee corporate interests regardless of economic conditions.

The requested ROE asks working families, seniors on fixed incomes, and small businesses to underwrite private shareholder returns that are insulated from the very market risks everyone else must bear.

That is not equitable, and it is not consistent with the Department's duty to ensure rates are just and reasonable.

A regulated monopoly is not entitled to premium-market returns without premium-market risk. Utilities operate with guaranteed customer bases, cost recovery mechanisms, and regulatory protections that dramatically reduce exposure compared to competitive enterprises. When risk is reduced, allowed return must follow. Anything else is a windfall at the public's expense.

If the proposed ROE exceeds what is necessary to attract capital under current economic conditions, then it is excessive. If the proposed capital structure overweights equity relative to debt in a way that inflates earnings, then it shifts avoidable cost onto customers.

Ratepayers should not finance a balance sheet designed to maximize shareholder yield rather than minimize consumer impact.


The Department must rigorously test:

  • Whether the proposed ROE reflects actual capital market conditions or simply industry wish-list benchmarks;
  • Whether the equity ratio is artificially high compared to comparable utilities;
  • Whether risk factors cited by the company are already mitigated by regulatory mechanisms;
  • Whether downward adjustments are warranted to reflect the company's low-risk, regulated status.

Every tenth of a percentage point in ROE translates directly into millions of dollars extracted from captive customers. This is not theoretical. It is real money coming out of household budgets in communities that are already stretched to the brink.

The responsibility of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities is not to preserve earnings targets. It is to protect the public from overreach. Approving an inflated ROE or an imbalanced capital structure would effectively compel residents to subsidize shareholder returns beyond what is reasonably required.

That would be a failure of regulatory discipline.

I urge the Department to substantially reduce any requested ROE to reflect true risk, require a capital structure that prioritizes affordability, and reject any element of this filing that places investor return ahead of consumer protection.

Before a single additional dollar is extracted from residents, the Department must also demand clear and compelling evidence that Berkshire Gas has:

  • Exhausted all internal cost controls;
  • Eliminated inefficiencies and unnecessary spending;
  • Scrutinized executive compensation and significantly reduced administrative overhead;
  • Minimized the financial impact on customers to the greatest extent possible.

If this increase is granted without aggressive examination and meaningful reductions, it will send a clear message that affordability is secondary to corporate earnings. That message would be deeply damaging to the public trust.

I demand that you reject this proposal in its current form and require substantial justification, transparency, and revision before any increase is even considered. The public deserves protection — not platitudes.

Ratepayers are not a blank check. They are the people you are charged with defending.

Respectfully,

Ashley Shade
City Council President
City of North Adams, Mass.

 

 


Tags: berkshire gas,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

McCann Tech Deems Social Media Threat 'Not Credible' After Police Investigation

Staff Reports

NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — McCann Technical School officials confirmed Thursday that a threatening social media post directed at the school was found to be a illagitaemt following an investigation by the North Adams Police Department (NAPD).

School administrators notified families that the NAPD determined the social media account responsible for the post was not legitimate and there is no credible threat to the campus.

"The post did contain threatening content to McCann Tech, but after investigation by NAPD it was found that the threat was NOT credible and that the social media account was NOT legitimate," the school stated in a message to the community.

While authorities have concluded that students and staff are not in any danger, McCann officials have requested an increased police presence at the school Thursday morning. The school emphasized that this measure is being taken out of an "extreme abundance of caution" to help students and families feel comfortable starting the day.

The NAPD is asking anyone with information regarding the origin of the post to contact the department directly.

Following the internal notification from McCann, North Adams Public Schools (NAPS) issued an "all-call" to its own district families Thursday morning.

"North Adams Public Schools will continue to operate using its standard safety procedures," the NAPS statement read, echoing the police department's conclusion that there is no active threat to local students.

McCann is part of the Northern Berkshire Regional Vocational Technical School District, not NAPS.

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories