Dalton Board Uncertain on How to Budget for Clean Air Efforts

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — As concerns about Berkshire Concrete's operations persist, Select Board members agree funding is needed, but are uncertain on how it should be allocated.
 
During its meeting on Monday, Select Board member Antonio "Tony" Pagliarulo requested that the town include in the budget funds for technical air-monitoring and potentially legal costs for the Clean Air Committee budget. 
 
In June, the board approved the establishment of a Clean Air Ad Hoc Committee, charged with reviewing the special permit and ensuring compliance. 
 
The committee consists of one Select Board member, a Board of Health representative, a Planning Board member, a Conservation Commissioner, and two citizen members: one from the Dalton Clean Air Coalition and another at-large citizen.
 
For over a year, residents attended numerous meetings urging action to stop sand from leaving parcel No. 105-16, owned by Berkshire Concrete, a subsidiary of Petricca Industries.
 
Since then, the Zoning Board ordered the company to fully remediate the unauthorized dig site on parcel No. 105-16, the Board of Health fined it $5,000, and the Planning Board denied its special permit
 
Board members seemed to agree that budgeting funds for clean air monitoring be set aside in the Clean Air Committee budget but not how legal fees should be budgeted. 
 
There is a lot of unknown surrounding the situation, so it is uncertain how much should be allocated, Town Manager Eric Anderson said, recommending the request be made to the Finance Committee. 
 
The town needs funds of about $20,000 to cover the cost of air monitoring for the upcoming year, Pagliarulo said. 
 
It is unclear if Berkshire Concrete has paid the fine or appealed the decision, but they had 14 days of receiving the notice, issued on March 2, to request a public hearing. 
 
If an appeal has not been requested and the fine was not paid, future violations may result in fines of up to $10,000 per infraction. We reached out to the Board of Health to confirm if the fine had been paid but have not heard back by the time of publication. 
 
It is unknown if the town will have to take Berkshire Concrete to court over the fine or if Berkshire Concrete plans to appeal the Planning Board's decision, he said. 
 
In January, the Clean Air Committee was awarded a grant for five PurpleAir monitors and Berkshire Regional Planning Commission also provided the town with five additional monitors, giving flexibility to move the monitors. 
 
Placement locations mentioned include Town Hall, Wahconah Regional High School, Craneville Elementary School, the Senior Center, and the housing across from Pinegrove Park.
 
During last year's annual town meeting, voters authorized $45,000 from free cash to fund professional and technical work, including the possibility of a lawyer and an engineering company, to ensure the compliance of Berkshire Concrete Corporation's special permit and town orders.
 
For transparency, some board members recommended that the funds for legal fees and technical air monitoring services be allocated in the Clean Air Committee budget; others argued that the legal fees be placed in the legal line-item of the budget. 
 
Another option is having a warrant article requesting a sum of money using free cash like the town did last year, Anderson said. 

Tags: air quality,   board of health,   dust, debris,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Company Fined for Asbestos Violations

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has issued a $17,400 penalty to Pittsfield-based Barile Environmental Inc. for asbestos violations that occurred during abatement services at an office building located at 23 Lewis Ave. in Great Barrington.  
 
MassDEP discovered the violations during inspections of the office building in October 2025. Barile failed to follow appropriate asbestos work practices and controls during its asbestos abatement activities at the building site. MassDEP inspections of the facility revealed that Barile personnel were removing asbestos-containing siding in violation of state asbestos regulations.  
 
"MassDEP enforces asbestos regulations so that management of asbestos-containing materials is completed safely," said Michael Gorski, director of MassDEP’s Western Regional Office in Springfield. "This consent order requires payment of a substantial penalty and could have been avoided if the proper work practices were followed." 
 
Following MassDEP's order, Barile has completed the required cleanup actions and must pay $14,000 of the $17,400 penalty to resolve the violations. The balance of the penalty is suspended pending compliance with the remaining administrative terms of the order.  
 
Property owners or contractors with questions about asbestos-containing materials, notification requirements, proper removal, handling, packaging, storage, and disposal procedures, or MassDEP asbestos regulations are encouraged to contact the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office for assistance.  
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories